Quote:
Originally posted by ThrobX@May 20 2005, 02:05 PM
Here's 75.6c of the proposed regulations (I'd be incredibly surprised if they didn't go with this as-is). Please let me know how you'll handle the fact that the custodian of records must be an employee of the producer.
-----------------------------
If the producer is an organization, the statement shall also contain the name, title, and business address of the individual employed by such organization who is responsible for maintaining the records required by this part.
-----------------------------
If the custodian didn't have to be an employee, everyone would just have their attorney be their custodian of records, giving them something of an attorney-client privilege on the whole thing.
|
Well us as the company that is producing the image would be using one of our principles as the record keeper.
Coming from our servers make us the producer , and we will list our contact info and maintian the copy of records as required .
If it becomes a situation where we need to be the owners of the content , then it would be our intention to enter an agreement with the provider/user of the content.This would give us a written use license to produce the particular image on the particular site(s) that they deem it to be used for. We may need to buy this right for something like a dollar for example, and the license be limited to allow us to produce it only on a certain site as the terms of the lease/sale to us. we at that time would become the secondary producer and provide our contact details to comply