Quote:
Originally posted by ThrobX@May 20 2005, 02:05 PM
Here's 75.6c of the proposed regulations (I'd be incredibly surprised if they didn't go with this as-is). Please let me know how you'll handle the fact that the custodian of records must be an employee of the producer.
-----------------------------
If the producer is an organization, the statement shall also contain the name, title, and business address of the individual employed by such organization who is responsible for maintaining the records required by this part.
-----------------------------
If the custodian didn't have to be an employee, everyone would just have their attorney be their custodian of records, giving them something of an attorney-client privilege on the whole thing.
|
Why couldn't you have your lawyer employed by your corporation to be custodian?