View Single Post
Old 01-27-2005   #14
nickdark
Members
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fatbaby@Jan 26 2005, 06:32 AM
Yahoo is starting to catch up, traffic wise..... the jury is still out on MSN, expecially with their jumbled results of their 'beta' SE release.... but I expect that to be sorted out, just as Yahoo!'s algo mess of a couple update's ago was...

for Mainstream type traffic, I've been most pleased with Yahoo! and MSN tho.... but as Titan said... optimizing for those, is totally different from what you need on Google.... Largley, I made the decision to tell Google to kiss my ass, and went with Yahoo! / MSN LOL
Well said!

..especially with the sandbox syndrome...lots of theories why..I go with the boosting money terms/adwords scenario!

Yahoo traffic is more productive too...aol was the best ..sniff.For a lot of adult terms aol have a nightsurf type solution called fantasyfinder which SUCKS...it can be passed by ,like nightsurf ,but most surfers will use it.. I suspect
__________________
nickdark is offline   Reply With Quote