So now you're saying that your attorney said that you don't need 2257 for photos that show 'simulated' sex, but you were all over me on the other board for saying webmasters didn't need it for playboy type, nude photos and actually used your car analogy to 'splain to me why I was full of crap and that they needed to comply even if the photo didn't show nudity but someone somewhere could say that it aroused someone? That makes a lot of sense.
