Quote:
Originally posted by RawAlex@Aug 23 2004, 05:07 PM
Hammer, while i will not post the results here, it was not hard to find underage nudes and other sorts of stuff on google. It was also interesting to see who is marketing porn by naming their pictures things like "underage porn" and "preteen girls"...
sick bastards.
Alex
|
What it would come down to in a court case would be that Google is a directory that uses spiders to catalog every page on the net, as well as images and since they neither produced the content, nor knowingly posted it in an attempt to gain financially, they would not be considered secondary producers.
What we all need to remember is that the proposed changes to 2257 were penned by John Asscraft and his witch hunt gang and have nothing to do with protecting children, but everything to do with eliminating porn on the internet, and they are not just out to eliminate the extreme stuff, but all of it.