View Single Post
Old 06-29-2004   #25
Biggy
Members
 
Biggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 768
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by cj@Jun 29 2004, 02:46 PM
4/5 is a just barely!!
Its only a matter of time now ...
how much time is the question. This decision bought us a couple of years IMHO. From what I understand, they have to list the technologies that would restrict porn-only sites. That will take research, and considering none has been dealt with yet, it may take longer than a couple of years...

The one thing I wish the judges would understand is that porn webmasters don't want kids coming to their sites, kids don't buy porn. I really feel as if porn webmasters are portrayed as shoving porn down children's throats.. If they truly understood that, then they would realize preventing children from looking at porn starts with the family, and the user, not the supply. The few porn webmasters that use disney keywords, etc. - i think 99% of most webmasters would agree they should be thrown in jail... Porn webmasters are regular people too Its the same fucking thing with drugs, the gov't goes after supply, not demand. Yet they don't realize as long as there is a demand, there will somehow be supply. Not only that, you will never solve the problem by going after the supply. At this point COPA is going to come down to the election. If Bush gets elected, they will get one form or another thru within the next term. If Kerry gets elected, it may still happen, but we'd be better off, as they may not necessarily want to waste their time with it.
__________________
Create a solid TGP presence for your site(s).
ICQ: 110850739
Biggy is offline   Reply With Quote