Quote:
Originally posted by RawAlex@Jun 18 2004, 11:59 AM
The biggest difference between the Clinton way to doing things and the Bush way of doing things is "boots on the ground"... it is way easier, way simpler, and somewhat less effective to do things the Clinton way, but you don't end up with a bunch of good kids in flag draped coffins.
Clinton was about trying to stop bad things... Bush is about overthrowing governments and making them be deomcratic, like it or not.
Alex
|
In Canada, bombing a country is not considered an act of war?
So let me get this straight. Clinton acted on "intelligence" and bombs a "WMD factory" in Sudan in retaliation for a bombing by al Qaeda. This happens in 1998 even though Osama was expelled from Sudan in 1995. After the fact, tons of evidence came out that contradicted the claim that there was a WMD plant there.
So for you, acting on intelligence is ok as long as it is just bombing and there aren't any "boots on the ground". If the US intelligence suspects there is a WMD plant in Canada, you think it is ok for the US to bomb it? This is not an act of war?