Quote:
|
Johnson: Yes, I think that's a fair statement. Certainly for some people it's a critical condition. The uninsured in our country, we know that they have a 15 to 18 percent mortality rate increase compared to those that are insured. We know that 18,000 of the uninsured die each year in this country for lack of insurance.
|
I know, I know, what I am about to say is more expected from Labret's mouth than mine,
but...I'll say it anyway.
Let's go back and study the mother Nature.
Mother Nature ALWAYS trys to regulate the world's population in the interests of...Mother Nature.
Bubonic Plague was taking millions to reduce world populaon,
plague was conqured, to be raplaced by tubercoulesis, viral infections taking millions in mass epedemics.
When this was conquered, the AIDS/cancer/heart desisses came to replace an old "Mother Nature's" self controling world population mechanism.
As far as Mother Nature is concerned:
I, my wife, you Peaches, PD, and everubody else who procreated, raised new generation of procreators, are absolutelly useless and serve no purpose,
thus getting rid of us is quite high on Mother Nature's priority list.
Like it or not, but this is Nature's way to get rid of it's unproductive elements.
Socirty works in a very much similar fashion,
and when society TRYS to implement the laws or develops against the mother Nature,
Mother Nature backfires with the vengence.
What if this higher mortality rate is the way of the society to FOLLOW the laws of the Mother Nature and get rid of it's outmost unproductive part?
Self Regulated genetic cleansing?
I am patiently await the retorts.....