View Single Post
Old 03-29-2004   #39
JR
Members
The global leader in pay-per-view AEBN
 
JR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: in my chair
Posts: 3,320
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by OldJeff@Mar 29 2004, 10:30 AM
Where are the facts that say we are safer, no attacks in 3 years shows nothing, like I said, there were no attacks for 5 years before 9-11
lets put it this way.

an exercise in logic.

the only way to prove we are not safer post 9/11, would be to prove that more acts have occured. or that less plot attempts were foiled post 9/11 than pre-9/11 while the total number of plot attempts remained similar (i.e. a decrease in success of foiling attempts or an increase in terrorist successes)

otherwise, its just a subjective argument. you do not really seem to be arguing about the patriot act or safety and security... you are saying all this to make it clear that you don't like Bush and supposedly feel less secure post 9/11 than pre 9/11 because of Bush policies.



Last edited by JR at Mar 29 2004, 10:42 AM
__________________
JR is offline   Reply With Quote