On another note concerning the ACTUAL trial that is going on... did anyone actually even READ the press release?
This case has nothing to do with models being forced... It has to do with Bondage/BDSM practices... almost all of the scenes in question involve play piercing in a BDSM scenario.
There isn't a single scene where there actually shows hardcore sex with a bound woman... the case is based on presumption that there was penetration but at no time can you see this in the videos.
Sweets were not oblivious to what the law states, they followed it. The law states that you cannot show penetration involving a bound woman. The court is saying that they crossed that line, yet I'd like anyone to show me where that can be found in ANY of their content... I have personally seen the videos that are being questionned and it doesn't exist.
__________________
|