Sorry, Sarettah, they would allow my laptop and there wasn't any wi-fi available.
As Gonzo told you earlier, we received a judgment after presenting our case to the judge. It was not an automatic default judgment because she didn't show.
She did write a letter to the court (penned by Jacqueline Barley-Marian under the penalty of perjury) that we viewed in the file yesterday morning. She attempted to poison the court with this terrible letter, and attached the press release from Kevin's conviction. The address was a mail drop in Indiana, and the signature was not hers. We had pulled a certified copy of a file from a $20K judgment she has against her with United Merchants Association. Inside the file, was a credit application filled out and signed by Barley.
We sent this credit application and the crazy FCC letter she wrote to a well-known handwriting expert, and she said preliminarily it looked like they were made by the same person, but she could be sure once she had more handwriting samples ordered by the court.
In the letter, she perjured herself by saying that she has lived in Indiana for the past two years, and is not a resident of California. The judge found that she was properly served, after we told him that one of our subpoenaed witnesses was a neighbor who had lived next to her for twenty years. The neighbor stated to us that the only person living in the apartment is Jacqueline Barley-Marian, she saw her just a couple of weeks ago when the neighbor was served, and that she still currently lives there. This neighbor even drove Jackie to her husband's funeral a couple of years ago.
The judge found that the statements made on Oprano constituted libel and qualified as publication. We also showed the posts where she mocked the entire court process and said she would continue her actions, no matter what happened in this court. We also showed the court that she is using multiple identities and has committed identity fraud.
We had forgotten to file a paper, and returned to the court 15 minutes later, where the case was reopened to add the costs to the judgment order. We were walking out, and were approached by a gentleman, that wanted more information about the details of the fraud. I think the DA is going to be very interested in this. I wonder who in Indiana helped her perpetrate this fraud on the courts.
She brought this all on herself. She begged and pleaded for an opportunity to tell her side, and we gave it to her. She didn't show and attempted to create an elaborate scenario to distract the courts, and in the process perjured herself. I think it is clear who was telling the truth here all this time.
Jackie I would call yourself a lawyer (a good one).