View Single Post
Old 11-20-2003   #9
FightThePatent
Members
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Meat@Nov 20 2003, 06:07 AM
The pror art should prob go to Spikes lawyers, the guys i am dealing with prob wont become invovled in this case other than to provide the basis to have acacia shut down.

The boys we talking to prob are looking for the real big fish later on
I send off prior art finds already to the defendants attorney...as well as 2 other attorneys in mainstream.

To have Acacia shutdown means SEC kind of stuff......... and there is some potential sniffing to do there.....

Big fish later on? There is no one big fish, it's a bunch of big fishes.

Acacia, SightSound, USA Video all going after patent infringements that are huge in scope. PanIP, SBC, E-Data, DET, the list goes on and on...lots of patent infringement, lots of patent abuse, lots of money spent on litigation. The real big fish is the Patent Office and going after patent reform.... that's the Moby Dick.


Fight the Blubber!
__________________
Learn more about Acacia and other patent abuse cases at: http://www.FightThePatent.com | find the goldmines of traffic
FightThePatent is offline   Reply With Quote