Carrie is napping at the moment, and I can't "really" speak for her, but I think I know where she is coming from.
To put it simply, displaying child birth as something "pornographic" is wrong. Even if you can see all the "important" parts, promoting it as "pornographic" takes it out of context. Listing "adult" webmaster sites with it puts it in a "tainted" light, so to speak. There isn't anything wrong with home birth videos, it is just being used in an off color way.
In most cases, if the video is viewed by anyone other than the couple/mom, it is the close fiends and family, and it is being shared as a very special moment in their lives. Some people may be a little bit further on the "free spirit" side and post it on the net, but it is still so that they can share something very special to them with whom ever may care to see it.
I too wouldn't think that any of these couples would have licensed their video/pics for someone else to use for profit. It is possible, but unlikely.
|