View Single Post
Old 11-13-2003   #50
sexeducation
Members
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 156
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.
Carrie ...
you are a LIAR and you know it.

You are "attacking the financial health" of my company and should be banned.

There has NEVER been pictures of video of children engaged in sexual acts on SexEducation.com.

You should be banned.
__________________
<A HREF="http://www.FightThisPatent.com" target="_blank" >FightThisPatent.com</A> & <A HREF="http://www.IMPAI.org" target="_blank">IMPAI.org</A>
Why would you want to tell Acacia who your customers are - every month - month after month?
sexeducation is offline   Reply With Quote