Quote:
Originally posted by JR@Jun 11 2003, 05:30 AM
how do you prove that Iraq was a direct threat to the USA? a threat so grave that they had to be invaded and occupied and their leaders and family members killed.
|
Uh...prove it to whom ?
You ? Me ? Ain't ever going to happen, we will get the information the government wants us to have...nothing more.
Sadam was taken out because it was in the best interest of the US (Or what the current Administration perceived to be)
WMD - I would feel a lot better if they did find them, my belief is they never will - They went out of Iraq at the first sign that we were serious about invading. Most likely sold or given to someone that will try and use them against the US.
Looking for them in Iraq is like looking for a 3 dollar whore in a convent.
As far as Bush goes - I see a lot of people giving him credit for things that are just not his doing.
Bush is not shrewd, sly, calculating - He is a fucking dope - Take away the family fortune and this guy could not hold a job flipping burgers.
Everything he has attempted in life has been a failure - trouble is too many dumb assed Americans will continue to vote the party line. It is simply a matter of which party can get the most of their mindless puppets to the polls.
Whenever either party has too much control everyone gets fucked - Our system was set up specifically to avoid what is has become - the checks a balances were put in place so that all sides of every issue would be evaluated, and the result would be what was best for the populace.
Right now there is no balance - the Right has a rubber stamp
Democrats like to credit Clinton for the 90's economic boom, Republicans like to credit Reagen for the 80's boom - both were extremely prosperous and good for the country.
No one ever points out that they were both dealing with opposing party Houses -
Whatever party you vote for President, vote the other for Congress - when there is balance there is prosperity