[Carrie]

I can't believe they've got Ronald Reagan on there - or anyone who served, regardless of how "painless" (as they put it) their service was. Some of the folks listed were in the Nat'l Guard - hate to break this to them, but that *is* serving your country, even on a limited-time basis. And in a case of war, the Guard are usually the first ones in there, to make way for the full-timers.

Now imagine the people who don't know their facts and took that report as truth because it was published in the paper. Irresponsible. The least they could've done is use special coloring or put a special mark beside the folks who did serve, to show that they did put in time but were still considered "bellicose" enough for the purposes of this list.