Quote:
Originally posted by RawAlex@Feb 20 2003, 02:00 PM
JR, becuase the 1% goes the other way too... I can site examples (Yemen) that show that the commander in chief has authorized asasinations... some people might call that terrorism.
You don't have 1% proof that I am a ****** or a ******.
That is the 1% that makes all the difference.
Alex
fixed a typo... I make alot of those thigns.
|
its still semantics. is someone guilty BEFORE being proven innocent? is Bush a proven terrorist?
where is 1% of anything relevent to anything?
you were defending the First Amendment and free speech.
of course you can say that it depends on who you ask. but were not really talking about the political opinions of Reindeer farmers in Northern Siberia.
I was making a rhetorical point about RawAlex and where he says one attack is ok (with no arguement about substantiating it or need to establish guilt and certainly no one is denying that point in the debate)... where an identical attack against RawAlex is not ok and is suddenly not a Constitutional issue about free speech and the First Amendment.
is your ignore button broken or what? your broken promises to ignore me are inflating faster than the National Debt.
