View Single Post
Old 01-23-2003   #22
Almighty Colin
Members
Want to see your own Advertising Here!
 
Almighty Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,059
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by *KK*@Jan 23 2003, 05:53 AM
Given the fact that we could have finished Iraq off years ago and didn't get the job done, it makes me wonder if we'll do it this time, should we end up going that route.

A decade ago, the coalition had one goal and one goal only. Liberate Kuwait. Now it is well known that many thought Saddam would get ousted from power as a result and that he didn't. The goal however was NEVER to remove Saddam from power ourselves. If he happened to die in a bunker somewhere, BONUS! But the "job" as it was clearly defined at the time was done. I have to say Gulf War I was a 100% success. Objective defined. Objective completed. One may not have agreed with the objective but it was clearly defined and everyone understood what it was. The coalition didn't have a mandate to march on Baghdad and look for Saddam.

Assumably the objective this time will be a regime change. Oust Saddam from power. Not "Kill or capture Saddam" but remove him from power. I think that would be the exit strategy.



Last edited by Colin at Jan 23 2003, 06:53 AM
__________________
Almighty Content. Your one stop for live content.

Secret Friends, LATINA Secret Friends , My Cam Friends
Almighty Colin is offline   Reply With Quote