Quote:
Originally posted by slavdogg@Nov 13 2002, 07:14 AM
Colin, well the apposite works just as well.
ARS for example, their raw clicks are pretty much right on the money
less than 5% error from my raw #s.
|
But do you think that is better for "overall business" as Colin said?
What if they shaved off 30% of the clicks and showed better ratios as a result? How many webmasters would actually think ARS is now suddenly converting better?
ARS click counts are indeed very close to the truth, my click counts show similar results to yours. But I've seen webmasters compare their ARS ratios to Topbucks ratios, and Topbucks only counts about one third (!) of my raw clicks.
I don't know how many webmasters can be fooled that way. It might well be better overall to just shave clicks..
Greetings,
Art