U.S. District Court Rules Against TorrentSpy
 

LOS ANGELES — TorrentSpy, one of the largest sources of illegal free adult content online, has suffered a defeat in a California courtroom.

A federal court in Los Angeles ruled against TorrentSpy.com, saying that the company destroyed evidence and provided false testimony during the discovery process for their trial against the Motion Picture Association of America. In the ruling, the court terminated the entire case.

Although estimating TorrentSpy's effect on adult industry profits would prove near-impossible, many in the industry blame torrent sites and similar file-sharing technologies for millions in lost revenue every year.

But attorney Ira Rothken, who represented TorrentSpy, told XBIZ that the case hinged on privacy. In its ruling, U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper wrote that TorrentSpy had intentionally modified or deleted key file directories, concealed users' IP addresses and withheld the names of forum administrators.

"TorrentSpy is very privacy-centric," Rothken said. "They had to choose between their privacy policies and the requirements for disclosure. They wanted to err on the side of protecting their users."

The MPAA had brought suit against TorrentSpy.com for providing a safe haven for terabytes of pirated movies, TV and other media. John Malcolm, executive vice president and director of worldwide antipiracy operations for the Motion Picture Association of America, said that illegal pirating and bootlegging of Hollywood movies costs the industry $11 billion annually.

"The court finds that plaintiffs have suffered prejudice, to the extent that a rightful decision is not possible," the ruling said.

To that end, TorrentSpy isn't giving up.
"It's not like they proved their case. It's not like they proved that TorrentSpy infringed copyright," said Justin Bunnell, founder of TorrentSpy. "I think we have a lot of grounds for appeal and we'll pursue it vigorously."

Re: U.S. District Court Rules Against TorrentSpy
 

I am little confused here. TorrentSpy was found to be a bunch of lying sacks of shit, and the case gets thrown out? What was the original case, TorrentSpy suing MPAA?

I missed something somewhere sometime somehow.

Re: U.S. District Court Rules Against TorrentSpy
 

"terminated the case" is a bit misleading. What that means in terms of this suit is that TorrentSpy's case for defense was terminated thereby awarding a complete victory to MPAA.

Re: U.S. District Court Rules Against TorrentSpy
 

I decided to see what the fuss was all about and I signed up on pirate bay and on empornium and I downloaded some DVDs or tried to...

a dvd 9 will take DAYS download rates of more than 150k/s were rare

more than 200k didnt seem to exist even on a well seeded title.

then I went on usent and got the same titles on dvd 9 in a couple of hours (I have 8mb/s cable)

thats where the real threat is.

Im wondering if anyone who downloads say "Pirates" off a torrent site would have ever bought it anyway.....hardly worth the damn wait....

Now usenet...theres a whole different story there.

Re: U.S. District Court Rules Against TorrentSpy
 

Mike, the people I know that are ACTIVE movie traders set up seperate PCs and often purchase a seperate internet connection and leave the box running for weeks at a time collecting a long list of stuff. They don't look at it as "I need this now", but rather as a long term project. Some of my asian friends are particularly heavy into this, mostly to get movies from Hong Kong and Singapore that they can't get here.

2 or 3 days to download a movie isn't important to them. They will get it, sooner or later.