Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Search Case
 

Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Computer Search Case
Warrant based only on Web site membership

Two judges on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals who are on the liberal and conservative extremes of the court joined forces in strongly dissenting from a court ruling that mere membership in a pornographic Web site containing both legal and illegal porn is enough to authorize the FBI to search a home computer.

"The majority concludes that the [search warrant] affidavit made out probable cause by assuming that anyone who subscribes to an internet site with both legal and illegal material must collect illegal material from the site," wrote Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, a conservative appointee of President George H.W. Bush.

Full story here: http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1144228258971

Re: Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Search Case
 

Okay, so the article tells me that the majority may right on this one - but I'm using a most un-legal rule of thumb - common sense. The domain name alone suggests/implies illegal content.

It kind of depends on where they are going to go with this. If, as the Federal Prostitu, er, Prosecutor is correct and there were "...other factors, combined with membership in the site..." justifying the warrant, then I don't really see much of a problem.

On the other hand ... if some Bush Appointee with a direct pipeline to Gawdamighty (and an eye on an open Congressional seat) siezes upon one illegal image on an otherwise legal website to go on multiple fishing expeditions, then there are serious problems.

Re: Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Search Case
 

The fishing scenario is what I fear.

Re: Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Search Case
 

What he said!! :)

Good post PD. :okthumb:

Re: Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Search Case
 

Its going to scare the shit out of subcribers.

Pornodoggy is Sex Story Site yours? If so, please hit me up at icq 365555

Re: Strong Dissent in Porn-Related Search Case
 

Yeah, the more I think about, so do I.