![]() |
I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
With all of the buzz of ipod porn, I have to wonder if the lawyers for Apple will be standing by to nail people registering domains with the name "ipod" in them?
I'm not sure they'd want their named associated with a site like, for example, ipodcumguzzlers, etc. They might also be leary of being associated with more extreme (and illegal) forms of porn being promoted for their devices. Like a lot of other people, I've been looking into ipod-related domains and it's always went through my mind of how nasty they might get with regards to their name being used to promote porn. |
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
I bet one could get away with just "pod" in the domain. :groucho:
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Quote:
...and no, I'm not seeking legal advice on a webmaster board, hehehe just guaging opinions on it... |
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
I imagine their attorneys are definitely on standby. It would be a violation of a registered trademark. They might even take a shot at "pod" related domains, but that one is a little iffy, perhaps. Again, not giving legal advice, just an opinion.
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Maybe use "eyepodwhatever.com" :)
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
How about "idiottechnogeekfreakwhowillbuyanythingcumsplatter .com"? :)
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Actually it is Podcasting not iPodcasting. You don't even need an iPod for it.
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Hmm, anyone got "ipawd" yet? :yowsa:
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Apple files for “iPodcast” trademark
http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000917058865/ (You know this means they will also own "podcast" if they get it) Apple sends cease and desist order to makers of “iPed” http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000070045953/ Apple Cracks Down on Google AdWords http://db.tidbits.com/getbits.acgi?tbart=08272 |
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Apple's corporate lawyers are on alert.
Apple's outside counsel are salivating. Judges are stocking up on caffine, because cases like this are some of the most monumentally boring things that come before them. Quote:
Don't think it's an automatic '"b" follows "a"' here. |
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Apple is pretty ruthless about protecting their trademarks.
http://www.ipodnn.com/news/05/10/18/...es.businesses/ |
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
I had flashbacks to losing a couple R'Us domains back in the day....don't really feel like fucking around with Apple...will just be interesting to watch
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
ipodscat.com is still available
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Quote:
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
They can keep the ipod names, I have lots of imobile ones ;)
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Quote:
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
|
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
Interesting Topic - My guess is any smart porn company will remove the "I-Pod" portion soon enough ... and make it something along the lines of 'Compatible with I-Pods'
I wouldn't think you you were to state something was comaptible with it you would have any problems. However saying "Ipod Porn" infers that Apple is actually behind it, and IMHO - legal action is just amatter of time... |
Re: I wonder if Apple laywers are standing by
There are so many people who are going to get the nod from their lawyers :okthumb:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 PM.. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022