Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   #1 REASON to be banned from Oprano (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=31958)

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 07:49 AM

ACTIONS against Oprano, it's members and their families...

everything else basically OK

sarettah 11-11-2003 08:00 AM

Damn...

I guess I got to cancel those contracts if I want to stay then......




:rolleyes:

Monk 11-11-2003 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 07:57 AM
ACTIONS against Oprano, it's members and their families...

everything else basically OK

who are its members?

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Monk+Nov 11 2003, 08:10 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Monk @ Nov 11 2003, 08:10 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 07:57 AM
ACTIONS against Oprano, it's members and their families...

everything else basically OK

who are its members?[/b][/quote]
http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php?s...ec8&act=Members

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 08:09 AM

I just pruned members with less than 1 post and...798 members disapeared
;-))))

Next week I prune 1 time posters, week after 2 time posters, and every week +1 pruning will be done...
let's have a TIGHT family
;-)))

Forest 11-11-2003 08:20 AM

does this include peeing on your neighbors lawn while wearing an offical oprano t-shirt?

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Forest@Nov 11 2003, 08:28 AM
does this include peeing on your neighbors lawn while wearing an offical oprano t-shirt?
nope, this is what EXPECTED from Opranoids in good standing!
;-)))

Minte 11-11-2003 08:24 AM

Then it's ok to hate the Chicago Bears?

Forest 11-11-2003 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 11 2003, 08:29 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 11 2003, 08:29 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Forest@Nov 11 2003, 08:28 AM
does this include peeing on your neighbors lawn while wearing an offical oprano t-shirt?
nope, this is what EXPECTED from Opranoids in good standing!
;-)))[/b][/quote]
MikeW

Were IN!!!!!

:wnw:

LadyMischief 11-11-2003 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Minte@Nov 11 2003, 05:32 AM
Then it's ok to hate the Chicago Bears?
Good morning handsome! I think it's allowable to hate sports teams.. But not the players! No wait, I think that's covered under the player haters ball.. never mind. lol

Evil Chris 11-11-2003 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Minte@Nov 11 2003, 09:32 AM
Then it's ok to hate the Chicago Bears?
As long as you love the Colts!
Right Sharpie? B)

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Minte@Nov 11 2003, 08:32 AM
Then it's ok to hate the Chicago Bears?
and Russian Bears, twinks, etc too
;-)))

LadyMischief 11-11-2003 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Evil Chris+Nov 11 2003, 05:46 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Evil Chris @ Nov 11 2003, 05:46 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Minte@Nov 11 2003, 09:32 AM
Then it's ok to hate the Chicago Bears?
As long as you love the Colts!
Right Sharpie? B)[/b][/quote]
Good Morning Chris! How are you and Funbrunette and the little one today?

Evil Chris 11-11-2003 08:41 AM

Lady M... we're all doing well! Ryan is just now starting to crawl a little bit. It's so funny to watch. He's so wide awake all the time, taking in his surroundings.

What have you been up to?

Monk 11-11-2003 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 11 2003, 08:12 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 11 2003, 08:12 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by -Monk@Nov 11 2003, 08:10 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano
Quote:

@Nov 11 2003, 07:57 AM
ACTIONS against Oprano, it's members and their families...

everything else basically OK


who are its members?

http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php?s...ec8&act=Members[/b][/quote]
OK... so what do you consider "ACTIONS"???

Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?

You might have a hefty list of people to ban.

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Monk+Nov 11 2003, 08:53 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Monk @ Nov 11 2003, 08:53 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by -Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 08:12 AM
Quote:

Originally posted by -Monk@Nov 11 2003, 08:10 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano

Quote:

Quote:

@Nov 11 2003, 07:57 AM
ACTIONS against Oprano, it's members and their families...

everything else basically OK


who are its members?


http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php?s...ec8&act=Members

OK... so what do you consider "ACTIONS"???

Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?

You might have a hefty list of people to ban.[/b][/quote]
I concider ACTIONS as deeds decremental to FINANCIAL interests of Oprano, it's members and their families.

do you need examples?

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 08:47 AM

Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?
*******************************

of course NOT!

Post a river...there are NO ANGELS here....

LadyMischief 11-11-2003 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 05:55 AM
Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?
*******************************

of course NOT!

Post a river...there are NO ANGELS here....

There's no angels, but there's an innocent in my tummy! :P

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LadyMischief+Nov 11 2003, 09:06 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (LadyMischief @ Nov 11 2003, 09:06 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 05:55 AM
Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?
*******************************

of course NOT!

Post a river...there are NO ANGELS here....

There's no angels, but there's an innocent in my tummy! :P[/b][/quote]
LM, I heard children inside the tummy can hear...please don't read Oprano out loud!
;-)))

Carrie 11-11-2003 09:20 AM

I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.

Sharpie 11-11-2003 09:29 AM

Yes'm Chris, we have to love our colts - until recently, about the last time they had a really good year - was the stike year. Our subs were better than other subs.....hahahahaha

Mike AI 11-11-2003 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 09:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.


Carrie, I think you are stretching things a little bit here.

I personally skip the morons posts. If he does something that is detrimental he will be banned. I doubt it will take that long for him to slip up.

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 09:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.

Carrie, in this case you are in MUCH bigger troubles...

do you know who the fuck I am?????????

from:
http://www.lukeford.com/stars/male/serge_birbair.htm


Serge responds: Luke, the author of that e-mail forgot to mention that: 1) I've beed spying for chinese goverment for 17 years and still sell them plans of nuclear submarines. 2) I had homosexual relations with every presidential candidate. 3) KGB VP' is my classmate and I e-mail him daily all government secrets I learnt on the board. 4) Lee Harvey Oswald was married to my sister.

they hang you 7 times for posting on the same boards I post.....

Master Blogger 11-11-2003 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 07:07 AM
Carrie, in this case you are in MUCH bigger troubles...

do you know who the fuck I am?????????

from:
http://www.lukeford.com/stars/male/serge_birbair.htm


Serge responds: Luke, the author of that e-mail forgot to mention that: 1) I've beed spying for chinese goverment for 17 years and still sell them plans of nuclear submarines. 2) I had homosexual relations with every presidential candidate. 3) KGB VP' is my classmate and I e-mail him daily all government secrets I learnt on the board. 4) Lee Harvey Oswald was married to my sister.

they hang you 7 times for posting on the same boards I post.....

I BOW to the POWER :wnw:

cherrylula 11-11-2003 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.

There are other boards where some people post that have much worse offenders than sexed posting, only difference is they are not retarded enough to let everyone know.....ya might want to think about that for a minute...

If posting on the same board as people breaking the law makes you guilty by association we're all fucked.

:)

Fletch XXX 11-11-2003 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM
Guilt by association.
I think Mom had too much coffee this morning!

:agrin:

Carrie 11-11-2003 11:38 AM

LOL Serge - okay then, might as well handcuff me and drag me away. :awinky:

Fletch it's Pepsi and I can't get enough of it *drool drool*

I guess all I can do then is sit back and hope to hell he fucks up. :(

sarettah 11-11-2003 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 11:46 AM
I guess all I can do then is sit back and hope to hell he fucks up. :(
dere be more than one way to skin a cat........... :yowsa:

PornoDoggy 11-11-2003 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah+Nov 11 2003, 11:49 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sarettah @ Nov 11 2003, 11:49 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 11:46 AM
I guess all I can do then is sit back and hope to hell he fucks up. :(
dere be more than one way to skin a cat........... :yowsa:[/b][/quote]
:ph34r: PETA be watchin you, boy :ph34r:

Nickatilynx 11-11-2003 11:58 AM

Quote:

might as well handcuff me and drag me away
best offer he'll get today ;-)))))

Buff 11-11-2003 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 07:17 AM
I just pruned members with less than 1 post and...798 members disapeared
;-))))

Next week I prune 1 time posters, week after 2 time posters, and every week +1 pruning will be done...
let's have a TIGHT family
;-)))

Nice, eventually it will be you and sarettah

sarettah 11-11-2003 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Nov 11 2003, 11:55 AM
:ph34r: PETA be watchin you, boy :ph34r:
I'ma laready a member of PETA........

People for the Eating of Tasty Animals........ :yowsa:

sarettah 11-11-2003 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff@Nov 11 2003, 12:07 PM
Nice, eventually it will be you and sarettah
Only if I keep posting, gonna have to stay a thousand or so ahead of the ax....... :yowsa:

Gman.357 11-11-2003 12:38 PM

Just checking to see if I was banned. Checking... 1-2-3. All clear.

:rokk:

Winetalk.com 11-11-2003 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gman.357@Nov 11 2003, 12:46 PM
Just checking to see if I was banned. Checking... 1-2-3. All clear.

:rokk:

hmmm...but I was banned today from 2 russian boards...
;-)))

baddog 11-11-2003 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 06:16 AM
LM, I heard children inside the tummy can hear...please don't read Oprano out loud!
;-)))

I heard that too, so I used to read Homer's Iliad and the Odyssey to my daughter when she was in my wife, thinking this would be a good thing.

Well, she turned out to be very smart, but hates the Iliad and the Odyssey.

Go figure.

baddog 11-11-2003 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.

well, at least we now know why you decided to not become an attorney. :rolleyes:

LadyMischief 11-11-2003 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 11 2003, 06:16 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 11 2003, 06:16 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by -LadyMischief@Nov 11 2003, 09:06 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano
Quote:

@Nov 11 2003, 05:55 AM
Because sexeducation is a MEMBER.... do ACTIONS include posting negative things?
*******************************

of course NOT!

Post a river...there are NO ANGELS here....


There's no angels, but there's an innocent in my tummy! :P

LM, I heard children inside the tummy can hear...please don't read Oprano out loud!
;-)))[/b][/quote]
I promise I'll only read the posts that are non-offensive, ok? :)

Carrie 11-11-2003 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by baddog+Nov 11 2003, 01:55 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (baddog @ Nov 11 2003, 01:55 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.

well, at least we now know why you decided to not become an attorney. :rolleyes:[/b][/quote]
Yeah I knew there had to be an easier way to get everyone to hate me without having to worry about convicted felons threatening my life when they finished their sentences. :)

Squirt 11-11-2003 02:25 PM

"#1 REASON to be banned from Oprano"

for giving the real link to the Paris Hilton video?



http://www.bangedup.com/Current/ParisGetsTheBeefin.wmv



She is a real firecracker!

Gman.357 11-11-2003 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Squirt@Nov 11 2003, 11:33 AM
"#1 REASON to be banned from Oprano"

for giving the real link to the Paris Hilton video?



http://www.bangedup.com/Current/ParisGetsTheBeefin.wmv



She is a real firecracker!

She mugs for the camera too much. A guy could get blue balls that way.

<_<

Carrie 11-11-2003 02:41 PM

Poor guy spent more time stroking himself than he did screwing her.
Note to guys: never try to screw a primadonna when there's a camera around. She'll be making love to the camera, not you! :P

eatapeach 11-11-2003 02:48 PM

hey carrie, what happened to travis?

it's just doesn't feel like oprano if i don't feel some repressed gaiety when i read your posts :awinky:

eatapeach 11-11-2003 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sarettah+Nov 11 2003, 09:21 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sarettah @ Nov 11 2003, 09:21 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--PornoDoggy@Nov 11 2003, 11:55 AM
:ph34r: PETA be watchin you, boy :ph34r:
I'ma laready a member of PETA........

People for the Eating of Tasty Animals........ :yowsa:[/b][/quote]
If we aren't supposed to eat animals, why are they made of meat?

Carrie 11-11-2003 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by eatapeach@Nov 11 2003, 02:56 PM
hey carrie, what happened to travis?

it's just doesn't feel like oprano if i don't feel some repressed gaiety when i read your posts :awinky:

I got the first draft for our new site today and I liked it so much I had to celebrate a bit (the avatar is a chunk out of the tour). Fight the Patent brought up a good point - everyone will think it's my legs, lol.

It's funny. No one thinks Vick is a cartoon or Serge is a nekkid statue but I am what my avatar is... hmmm. I could do evil things with that... :groucho:

Sorry about Travis going though. It'll change again eventually and I'll have some sexy hunk back up there. Probably him!

HoneyBlond 11-13-2003 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 12 2003, 12:29 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 12 2003, 12:29 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Forest@Nov 11 2003, 08:28 AM
does this include peeing on your neighbors lawn while wearing an offical oprano t-shirt?
nope, this is what EXPECTED from Opranoids in good standing!
;-)))[/b][/quote]
Ok,

Well I might need you guys to send me a T-shirt then

:awinky:

Winetalk.com 11-13-2003 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HoneyBlond+Nov 13 2003, 08:03 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (HoneyBlond @ Nov 13 2003, 08:03 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by -Serge_Oprano@Nov 12 2003, 12:29 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--Forest
Quote:

@Nov 11 2003, 08:28 AM
does this include peeing on your neighbors lawn while wearing an offical oprano t-shirt?


nope, this is what EXPECTED from Opranoids in good standing!
;-)))

Ok,

Well I might need you guys to send me a T-shirt then

:awinky:[/b][/quote]
hhahahahahahha,
Billy is in charge, ask him!
;-)))

can you show us your tits first?
(just so he know the size?
;-0))

HoneyBlond 11-13-2003 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 14 2003, 12:05 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 14 2003, 12:05 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>
Quote:

Originally posted by -HoneyBlond@Nov 13 2003, 08:03 PM
Quote:

Originally posted by -Serge_Oprano@Nov 12 2003, 12:29 AM
<!--QuoteBegin--Forest

Quote:

Quote:

@Nov 11 2003, 08:28 AM
does this include peeing on your neighbors lawn while wearing an offical oprano t-shirt?


nope, this is what EXPECTED from Opranoids in good standing!
;-)))


Ok,

Well I might need you guys to send me a T-shirt then

:awinky:

hhahahahahahha,
Billy is in charge, ask him!
;-)))

can you show us your tits first?
(just so he know the size?
;-0))[/b][/quote]
LOL

International Peace keeping treaties require keeping my clothes on for the greater good of humanity as we know it...

However I have a new customer service manager what if I show you her's instead ?

:awinky:

Winetalk.com 11-13-2003 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by HoneyBlond@Nov 13 2003, 08:52 PM

LOL

International Peace keeping treaties require keeping my clothes on for the greater good of humanity as we know it...

However I have a new customer service manager what if I show you her's instead ?

:awinky:

as long as the tits are big
ass is big and boneprone would never fuck her,
I'm game!
;-)))

sexeducation 11-13-2003 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 11 2003, 06:28 AM
I disagree wholeheartedly. I feel that by his mere presence here, he is harming the members.
Imagine if any of us were (god forbid) taken to court. There we are showing our warning pages, our links to the IRCA, etc in order to prove that we have no wish to be associated with children in any way.
And then the District Attorney asks something like whether or not we frequently visited a message board that was also frequented by a person who admitted to putting pictures of underage children engaged in sexual acts on his website. No matter what you say, they have printouts or screencaps of you posting in a thread where SexEd posted.
There goes your character, at least, if not your defense. Conversing with an admitted pedophile. Even if you don't speak to him (which we all have), his mere posting in a thread that you've posted in constitutes being involved in a "conversation" with him. Guilt by association.

Carrie ...
you are a LIAR and you know it.

You are "attacking the financial health" of my company and should be banned.

There has NEVER been pictures of video of children engaged in sexual acts on SexEducation.com.

You should be banned.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 PM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022