Oprano Adult Industry Forums

Oprano Adult Industry Forums (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/index.php)
-   Legacy Archived Main Board (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   Scary Article (http://www.oprano.com/msgboard/showthread.php?t=27938)

Mutt 11-14-2002 03:24 PM

somebody posted this at GFY. Read it, it's not Debka, make of it what you want but i think these fuckers are very capable of this. 9/11 was an 'opening act'.


Front Page

THE ROVING EYE
Apocalypse Now, or Alottanukes Soon
By Pepe Escobar

At a time when a tape handed over to the Qatar-based Al-Jazeera television station has received widespread expose for its purported comments by Osama bin Laden in praise of recent terror events around the world, another al-Qaeda message released to the same station has received little coverage.

Al-Jazeera was granted an interview with one Mohammed al-Usuquf, allegedly al-Qaeda's number three. Al-Usuquf is said to be a doctor in physics and to hold a masters degree in international economics. A copy of the interview was sent to the prestigious Arab-language daily Al Quds Al Arabi, edited in London, but it was not printed.

Asia Times Online has obtained a copy of the interview, and reproduces excerpts here, with the caveat that the identity of the man has not yet been confirmed, nor has his membership within al-Qaeda.

Al-Usuquf says that al-Qaeda's Kuwaiti spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, and bin Laden himself, suggested that he grant the interview. Bin Laden, he says, is "alive and healthy, along with his commanders Mohammed Atef, Khalid Shaik Mohammed and Mullah Omar".

Al-Usuquf starts by criticizing Washington's disrespect of the Kyoto Protocol on climatic change, the International Criminal Court and the Palestinian cause, as well as the "financial greed" engendering speculative gains over Third World countries. He also criticizes the manner in which America wastes wealth, like US$80 billion a year on gambling. "They [have] lost the notion of spirituality and only live in sin."

For this reason, America must be destroyed, and al-Usuquf insists that "aircraft carriers, nuclear submarines and spy satellites will be worthless in the next war".

Al-Qaeda, according to him, has 5,000 first rank operatives and around 20,000 all over the world. Of all the prisoners in the US, only "20 or 30" are al-Qaeda, and all of them "second-rank". Confirming Asia Times Online information, he swears that there are no first-rank prisoners in Guantanamo in Cuba. Al-Usuquf says, "We have more than 500 first-rank and 800 second-rank [operatives] inside the US." "First rank" are considered ones that have lived in the US for more than 10 years, most of them married with children. "They have an idea about the plans, and they are just waiting for a call." "Second-rank" operatives arrived in the past five years and "have no idea about the plans". They are all willing to die.

Al-Usuquf insists that September 11 "was just the beginning. It was a way to call the world's attention to what's going to happen." He then details a plan to destroy the US by "attacking the heart of what they consider the most important thing in the world: money".

"The American economy is an economy of false appearances," says al-Usuquf. "There's no real economic weight. American GNP is something around $10 trillion, but only 1 percent comes from agriculture, and only 24 percent from industry. So 75 percent of its GNP comes from services, and most of it is financial speculation. For someone who understands economics, and apparently America's Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill does not, or cannot, the US as a whole behaves like an immense dot.com, and dollars are its stocks. The value of stocks from a given company is directly proportional to its profitability. When a company only provides services, but does not produce goods, the value of its stocks depends on its credibility. What I'm saying is if US credibility is affected, its stocks - the US dollar - will fall at tremendous speed, and the whole American economy will collapse."

Al-Usuquf is absolutely positive, "because, in a smaller scale, this is exactly what big financial conglomerates do with Third World countries to collect profits in one month that no Swiss bank would guarantee in four to five years". Al-Usuquf says that al-Qaeda could do the same by "provoking a deficit of $50 to 70 trillion, the equivalent to five to seven years of the GNP of the US". How? By "destroying America's seven largest cities and some other measures". The means? "Atomic bombs." Al-Usuquf's most startling revelation is that the bombs "won't be launched, they are already there". "Seven nuclear heads have already been positioned on American soil, before September 11, and they are ready to be detonated. Before September 11, American security was a fiasco, and even later, if we needed, we could position the bombs there. They arrived through seaports, as normal cargo. A nuclear head is not bigger than a fridge, so it can easily be camouflaged as one. Thousands of containers arrive at a seaport every day, and even with very efficient security, it's impossible to check and examine each one of them."

Al-Usuquf says that the bombs were bought on the black market: five from the former USSR and two from Pakistan. The five Russian heads "are from T-3 missiles, also known as RD-107, and their power is around 100 kilotons each, that is five times the Hiroshima bomb. The Pakistani ones are less powerful, something around 10 kilotons each."

Each of the Russian bombs would have cost around $200 million. Al-Qaeda was able to raise the money "because we have many sponsors. Many countries sponsor us, and also some very rich people." And not all of these are Arab countries. "Some European countries as well are also interested in the fall of the US." As to the "rich people", they are "people who are also tired of seeing the US bleeding the rest of the world."

And Iraq's Saddam Hussein, says Al-Usuquf, is not one of these people, "but just a collaborator, represented by Abdul Tawab Hawaish, his vice prime minister and responsible for Iraq's arms program".

Al-Usuquf says that the bombs cannot be detected by US authorities. "Even if they are old, they were modernized and are very well hidden. Even if they were located, they have autodetonation mechanisms in case something or someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic pulse is not capable of deactivating them." The bombs allegedly cannot be detected because "they are enveloped in thick layers of lead". They could be detonated "by various methods - cellphone call, radio frequency, seismic shock or by their regressive clock".

Al-Usuquf details the whole plan. "First, one head would be detonated, which would cause the deaths of 800,000 to 1 million people and a chaos never seen before. During this chaos, two or three planes, which are now disassembled inside barns near empty roads in the US countryside, would take off in suicide missions to pulverize another two or three big American cities with chemicals. Once the disease was identified, all seaports and airports would be quarantined. Land borders would also be closed. No plane, boat or car would enter or leave the US. This would be total chaos." The first target would be the city "that would offer the best conditions, for example bright sky and winds of eight or more miles an hour blowing towards the center of the country, so radioactive dust can contaminate the largest possible area".

This attack would not knock out the US, recognizes al-Usuquf, "But the process would be initiated. As with the World Trade Center, it would be just a question of time for the whole economic structure to be turned to dust. If the objectives are reached with one bomb and diseases, probably we will save the lives of other people, but it's risky, and probably six more bombs will be detonated, one a week, and more attacks with chemical weapons will be launched." According to estimates made by al-Usuquf "and Ayman al-Zawahiri", al-Qaeda's number 2, about 15 million people would die, victims of the bombs and the radiation. Among those contaminated by diseases, "25 percent will die, a figure around more than 5 million, plus many others due to the chaos and disorder".

Al-Usuquf does not fear an American military response. "Even if five or 10 cities are chosen at random to be destroyed, it will still be a small price to pay. The problem is that the economic despair will be so great that even if it saves [money] by not using weapons, American liquidity will be near zero, and the US will make more money selling a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier to Turkey or Italy for $5 billion, because they will urgently need to recapitalize. But it will be too late. Moreover, what will remain of an American soldier's morale to fight knowing that his whole family died and his country ceased to exist? To fight for what?"

The world economy would not collapse, says al-Usuquf, although "in the beginning, it will be very difficult. But without the US the world will soon rise in a more just and fraternal manner. Nothing can stop the plan."

And whatever America does, "it's too late". When will the attack begin? "I can't tell."

(©2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)

-= JR =- 11-14-2002 04:17 PM

this must be more Bush/Republican/Homeland Security scare tactics.

the main thing of course as we all know, is that our privacy is protected while 15 million people get nuked or sprayed with various diseases and the country falls apart.
:unsure:

wig 11-14-2002 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mutt@Nov 14 2002, 03:32 PM
What I'm saying is if US credibility is affected, its stocks - the US dollar - will fall at tremendous speed, and the whole American economy will collapse."

At the beginning of the year I stated that my work suggested a MAJOR dollar debacle, that would begin in March and stretch into at least March of 2003. I have also been a proponent of Gold, as I expect a MAJOR bull market in precious metals.

I am not a fundamentalist and all my work is from the study of historical price action and cycles.

It will be interesting to see what happens.

Winetalk.com 11-14-2002 04:56 PM

bullshit article...100% bullshit

TheEnforcer 11-14-2002 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 14 2002, 05:04 PM
bullshit article...100% bullshit
It does sound a little far fetched doesn't it.

Though, if true, it's scary as shit to contemplate.

:(

Winetalk.com 11-14-2002 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by TheEnforcer+Nov 14 2002, 05:07 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (TheEnforcer @ Nov 14 2002, 05:07 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano@Nov 14 2002, 05:04 PM
bullshit article...100% bullshit
It does sound a little far fetched doesn't it.

Though, if true, it's scary as shit to contemplate.

:([/b][/quote]
TE,
one thing I learned in life -
No Advance Warnings
and if the article was genuine,
it would have been violation of this simple rule of engagement.

TheEnforcer 11-14-2002 05:25 PM

Good point.

Monk 11-14-2002 05:32 PM

Here is a mothly chart of a good gold mining stock. Notice the massive volume on the recent rise in gold and the subsequent drop off in volume as it pulls back / consolidates.

It looks to me from the daily charts like gold could break out in the next week or so OR it may pull back one more time and break out in early 2003.

maclyyay[pb34!b8!c10!b4!b50!d20,2][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9!Lh14,3!Lc20!Lg]&pref=G]http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?...!Lg]&pref=G

wig 11-14-2002 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Monk@Nov 14 2002, 05:40 PM
It looks to me from the daily charts like gold could break out in the next week or so OR it may pull back one more time and break out in early 2003.


Hey Monk.

I hope that latter is correct. I have some cycles this month, but my preferred scenario still has metals going down into January. I am short silver, so I may be talking my position. <_<

Wherever the next low unfolds, I believe it will be a MAJOR low that leads to a surprising rally.


In regards to the article, if they had those weapons here, would they not have used them already? Why wait? Why take the risk of pulling off hijackings when you could just "flip the switch" on several nuclear devices? Obviously BS.

The one thing that is accurate in that article is the premise that the US is a house of financial cards that is very vulnerable. Whether the "catalyst" is another attack, war, a major bankruptcy or just the WAY MARKETS FUCKING WORK.... well, that's in the eye of the beholder and usually only in retrospect. :D

gigi 11-14-2002 06:13 PM

Quote:

It does sound a little far fetched doesn't it.
If there's one thing I learned after 9/11 it's that nothing is as 'far fetched' as I thought.....I'm sure none of us would have believed a story such as what was played out on that day. :(

BUT, I think Serge is very right....the element of surprise is completely negated by this article...

Bama 11-14-2002 06:45 PM

This article has a couple of flaws in it - most in this 1 paragraph.
Where he says:

Even if they were located, they have autodetonation mechanisms in case something or someone gets close. Even an electromagnetic pulse is not capable of deactivating them." The bombs allegedly cannot be detected because "they are enveloped in thick layers of lead". They could be detonated "by various methods - cellphone call, radio frequency, seismic shock or by their regressive clock". Had he said mercury/barometric switches, I'd have given him a tiny amount more of "knowing what I'm talking about" credibility. There is a HUGE difference between a bomb blowing up and a nuclear device detonating.

If the bomb are encased in lead to prevent detection - then that goes both ways. The bomb won't be able to detect motion (by someone being "too close") to it and certainly cellphones and radio frequencies aren't going to be able to get through either to remotely detontate them. There's a reason x-ray technicians wear lead vests.

Secondly, if the bombs are already in place prior to Sept. 11 and very well hidden and they are intended to be denotated in major cities - seems logical enough until you reread the paragraph above. They supposedly have motion detectors attached to them in case anyone "gets close". Getting past the encased in lead argument I posed above, name 1 place in NY or LA where you can stand for 14 months and not have 1 person get within 3 feet of you? Hell, I can't take a piss in the woods and not have someone see me do it.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:48 PM..

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Evil Empire Inc. 2006-2022