View Single Post
Old 10-29-2008   #27
RawAlex
Members
$100 for every ImLive sign-up
 
RawAlex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,036
Default Re: Devinn Lane Files Suit Against Vivid, Digital Playground, Others

Quote:
Originally Posted by LizAEBN View Post
I think this still goes back to nominative vs. fair use though - the studios have the right, based on a typical release, to use her name for promotional purposes. This does not preclude her right to use her trademarked name in a proprietary versus marginal way.

There's a marked difference in saying "Buy movies featuring StarName here" and "This is StarName's Site."

It begs the question - is a domain name an absolute indication of "the is star names site"?

Further, if you have a pornstar fan site, (say pornstarnamexxx.com) and you run a webmaster affiliate program, pornstarnamecash.com, and clearly state that this is NOT the official pornstar site just a fan site / cash program) at what point have you limited that star's rights to her name? After all, she signed away in the model releases the use of her name, image, likeness, etc for pretty much all purposes.

I can understand going after squatters, but somewhere along the line it conflicts with the rights she has granted to others (which may include the rights to transfer or re-grant those rights to others). It's not as easy as the lawyer types would like us to think.
__________________
Let's go to the edge of disaster Push the pedal and go a little faster Let's slam into a wall at ramming speed Let's go to the edge of a mountain Jump off and lets start countin' Hit the ground and tell me if it bleeds
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote