View Single Post
Old 10-29-2008   #26
miz_wright
Head CheeseMonger
 
miz_wright's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,069
Default Re: Devinn Lane Files Suit Against Vivid, Digital Playground, Others

Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex View Post
Michael, my answer would be "what, model released mean nothing?" Most model releases do specifically include use of name.

Go after the squatters, that's fine - but going after people who have purchased rights to her content and run a business based on it would be horrible. Stars doing that sort of move might find themselves in the cold, as it were, as programs won't want to touch them with a 10 foot pole for fear of getting sued.
I think this still goes back to nominative vs. fair use though - the studios have the right, based on a typical release, to use her name for promotional purposes. This does not preclude her right to use her trademarked name in a proprietary versus marginal way.

There's a marked difference in saying "Buy movies featuring StarName here" and "This is StarName's Site."
__________________
Sales Babe and General Nerd

Be different; get it Wright
Wright Stuff Consulting

Hit me on ICQ at 353902844 or email me at liz (at) wrightstuffconsulting (dot) com
miz_wright is offline   Reply With Quote