PDA

View Full Version : Anybody have a problem with this?

sarettah
03-29-2009, 01:26 PM
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=896527
Toby
03-29-2009, 01:49 PM
I wouldn't touch content like that even with someone elses 10 foot pole.

Deliberately making the model look "too young" tells me you're targeting pedos as a customer base.
softball
03-29-2009, 02:43 PM
This topic seems to recirculate every few months......forever. I don't personally like it, but some "esteemed" members of this community past have been promoting similar stuff.... like this.... http://www.littlebree.com/81395999/index.html for a long time. Its kind of a non starter because it won't go away.

If you click this link be prepared for a bunch of exit pop ups etc. But it is an example of what some "respected" business men are promoting.
gonzo
03-29-2009, 02:54 PM
Wow... not my thing.
sarettah
03-29-2009, 06:59 PM
Hmmm. seems I mighthave gotten Joe (amacontent) a little riled...lol
Toby
03-29-2009, 07:08 PM
Yup, definitely iritating a raw nerve.
gonzo
03-29-2009, 09:28 PM
Hmmm. seems I mighthave gotten Joe (amacontent) a little riled...lol

You mean rubberless Joe?

The one that took advantage of the very last pickem here with a prize of super bowl tickets that he never had and tried to get out of with after Evil Chris won them?
Hell Puppy
03-29-2009, 10:38 PM
same issue as non-nude sites.

as toby said, building this content only caters to pedos. dont want 'em anywhere near my sites. there are things i'm aware of that monitor their movement after they grab certain pictures that i do not wish to have logging my urls.
sarettah
03-29-2009, 10:58 PM
You mean rubberless Joe?

The one that took advantage of the very last pickem here with a prize of super bowl tickets that he never had and tried to get out of with after Evil Chris won them?


I had forgotten all about that. Had to go back and search to remember when that all happened. It was January 2005.
sarettah
03-29-2009, 10:59 PM
same issue as non-nude sites.

as toby said, building this content only caters to pedos. dont want 'em anywhere near my sites. there are things i'm aware of that monitor their movement after they grab certain pictures that i do not wish to have logging my urls.


No no no HP. You must be a porn hater. Don't you realize it's all make believe and that makes it A-OK?

Or at least that's what AMA-Joe says.

:yowsa:
softball
03-29-2009, 11:34 PM
No no no HP. You must be a porn hater. Don't you realize it's all make believe and that makes it A-OK?

Or at least that's what AMA-Joe says.

:yowsa:

How do you feel about literature and under age fantasies? Like say....Nabokov?
sarettah
03-29-2009, 11:44 PM
How do you feel about literature and under age fantasies? Like say....Nabokov?

I have not actually read Nabokov but do know the reference, but there is a difference between "art" and "porn" (imho).

There is literature and there is porn just as there are films and there is porn.

And sometimes, yes, the lines get quite close to each other.

In this particular case I don't think so.

Although Joe-AMA did try to compare his "Daddy's Girl" with Wes Craven's "Last House on the Left" I would bet his script consists more of "Oh yeah, give it to me daddy" then of anything with any artistic merit.
sarettah
03-30-2009, 12:09 AM
How do you feel about literature and under age fantasies? Like say....Nabokov?

lol. I answered you above but then realized thgat I got sidetracked.

I really could not care about with the content Joe-ama put in the thread.

Is it legal, probably. Would I go near it, no way.

My issue is with people doing content like that and pretending that it is not for the pedo market.

If you are gonna go after that market as least be honest about it.

The effects on the industry that that sort of content has is another matter.
MRock
03-30-2009, 12:35 AM
Simply put, it's creepy ... I guess times are hard and it makes people push the boundries in the pursuit of sign-ups. When I was with AN, we had an amateur site of a young looking girl that I thought would not make any money ... plain, young looking, flat chested etc. She was making 10k a month in sign-ups as soon as we launched ... that was my first eye-open to the size of that market. Not my cup of tea, definately.
gonzo
03-30-2009, 02:29 PM
I had forgotten all about that. Had to go back and search to remember when that all happened. It was January 2005.

Says a lot about integrity when you have a guy that constantly takes shortcuts.

And we had to raise a lot of hell before he finally came off of the cash for Evil Chris. I always felt like he never had any intention of giving out the prize to begin with.
tony404
03-31-2009, 02:31 PM
it makes us an easy target.