PDA

View Full Version : Former Penthouse Editor Quit Because of Marc Bell's "Meddling"


gonzo
03-20-2008, 08:43 AM
[Forbes.com]- Playboy is something of a flop as a public company. What would make Penthouse any different?

Former Penthouse editor Mark Healy recalls a heated conversation last spring with his then boss, Penthouse Media Group Chief Executive Marc Bell, [pictured] who was angry about a magazine item that tweaked a celebrity.

"What's this damned Howard Stern story doing in here?!" fumed Bell. Healy considered the piece innocuous. Bell thought it was inflammatory enough to anger Stern, who frequently hosts Penthouse Pets on his radio show. Healy later quit because of Bell's meddling.

Bell, 40, has given Penthouse, for decades one of the most explicit men's magazines, a "softer focus," as he puts it. The cover shot is more conservative than most images in Sports Illustrated's swimsuit issue. Bell has spent $8 million on the redo after buying Penthouse and related properties out of bankruptcy for $52 million four years ago. The gussying up is mainly for Wall Street. Bell hopes Penthouse Media Group will raise $250 million in stock in an initial offering, perhaps in the summer.

There's a lot of airbrushing under way. Penthouse is the tame front for a racy collection of 27 social-networking Web sites that Bell and Daniel Staton, company chairman, bought late last year for $500 million in cash and stock. The sites, previously owned by a Palo Alto, Calif. company that carried the plain-brown-wrapper name Various, turned Penthouse Media Group into the world's largest adult entertainment company.

The biggest site by far is the very X-rated AdultFriendFinder. With 22 million active members, the site is a Match.com for people who want to find bedmates. There's nothing subtle here, especially in the photography members send in. Special-interest groups include folks who like orgies in central New York state and some people interested in Buffalo sex, apparently a reference to the city, not the animal. There are listings from around the world. Kazakhstan has 2,644 swingers.

Fees from 1.2 million paying members of this site, who shell out an average $25 a month for full access, brought in $285 million last year, or 85% of the total from all the social networking sites Penthouse Media Group acquired. Last month AdultFriendFinder got 8 million unique visitors, who lingered an average 16 minutes on the site, says Nielsen Online. Playboy.com attracted only 1.3 million unique visitors, who dropped by for just more than 5 minutes.

Penthouse Media Group's recently acquired sites, which also include Passion.com and BigChurch.com, a site for Christians who want prayer mates, have a total of 45 million active members. Bell plans to use the money from a stock offering to make more acquisitions and to pay off part of the company's $400 million in debt. With Staton, he owns 60% of Penthouse Media Group.

Penthouse, the magazine, with only 12 pages of ads in the 150-page March issue, will never be a powerhouse alone. But will Penthouse Media Group, as a public entity, excite investors? Playboy Enterprises (nyse: PLA - news - people ) is struggling. At $8 its stock, adjusted for all capital changes, is trading for less than half its price when it went public 37 years ago.

But Bell is full of ideas for brand extensions of the sort that never worked too well for Playboy. He plans to sell X-rated mobile applications for cell phones that will allow users, who pay up to $10 a month, to watch videoclips of Penthouse Pets. The company has a line of 20 Penthouse-branded accessories (like a French maid's outfit) that will be sold through the magazine, as well as Penthouse.com and a few boutiques.

Visitors to Penthouse's Web site, which is more salacious than the magazine, can pay $20 a month to watch streaming videos with titles that include Cheek Freaks 4. Bell recently signed a deal with New Frontier Media (nasdaq: NOOF - news - people ) to make Penthouse Video On Demand available on tv in 59 million homes.

Bell plans to let Penthouse magazine, its Web outlets and other ventures market one another. Penthouse Pets make guest appearances in nine Penthouse Executive Clubs, which bring in $4 million in licensing fees a year. Ads in Penthouse magazine tout AdultFriendFinder.

Members of that site will soon be able to subscribe to an online version of the magazine, which will be delivered as a pdf file, for $1 a month. All the cross-fertilization is exciting to some. "This is fabulous for business," says Edward Norwick, restaurant manager of the Penthouse Executive Club in Manhattan, as scantily clad women gyrate on a stage nearby.

Things certainly look more promising than they did when Bell and Staton bought the magazine in 2004. Penthouse made Bob Guccione, who created the magazine in 1965, a rich man for a while. Around 1990, when the magazine's circulation peaked at 5 million, Guccione lived in a 27-room midtown Manhattan mansion that was filled with valuable art and pretty women. When called upon for business meetings, Guccione often arrived with his shirt unbuttoned to the waist and, occasionally, wearing a necklace adorned with a miniature replica of his genitals, plated in gold.

But Guccione, 77, lost millions of dollars in ventures that included a casino. As more men started turning to the Web for porn in the late 1990s, Guccione made the magazine raunchier, alienating advertisers and readers.

By 2003 Guccione's Penthouse was losing $6 million a year and its circulation was only 320,000. Unable to keep up payments to his lender, Guccione abandoned his Manhattan lair--later bought by Wall Street financier Philip Falcone for $49 million--and lost his magazine. He now lives in Englewood Cliffs, N.J., in a house once owned by his late first wife. "We are fixing problems from the past," says Bell. "These are things Guccione should have done 20 years ago."

Bell never expected to find himself in the sex business. But don't call it "porn," a four-letter word to him. "We can't be seen as guys sitting around with gold pinky rings," he snaps.

Bell clearly gets his kicks from more mainstream pursuits. Previously he built Web-hosting giant Globix in the late 1990s. When the tech bubble burst, Bell watched Globix, which once had a bigger market cap than Apple (nasdaq: AAPL - news - people ), sink into bankruptcy.

By luck or smarts, he had sold a third of his stake in the company for $130 million before the crash. Since then Bell and Staton have raised some $1 billion to buy stakes in 450 companies. They also dabble in real estate and the theater. They co-produced with others the Tony Award-winning Broadway hits Hairspray and The Producers.

At Penthouse Media Group there are more business publications than girlie magazines in Bell's office, where six computer screens track the performance of the companies in which Bell and Staton own stakes. Next to each listing is a colored bar showing each stock's up-to-the-minute price. Soon, Bell hopes, Penthouse Media Group will have a place on the screen and its bar will glow green. "Sex," he says, smiling, "is recession-proof."

WebBilling.com
03-20-2008, 09:14 AM
Yep, owners 'meddling with your work' can really be annoying :lmao1:

will76
03-20-2008, 01:06 PM
[Forbes.com]-

The biggest site by far is the very X-rated AdultFriendFinder. With 22 million active members.......

Fees from 1.2 million paying members of this site,


LOL i love how they say 22 million active members but only 1.2 million were paying members. I would think the 1.2 million who paid is probably a more accurate number of the "real" people who use the site. I wonder how many of those 22 million active are fake profiles and people spamming. but 22 million does sound sexy.


Here is my thoughts on this, first posted here right now.

AFF / Cams bought all the ads they could, they offered payouts that they were losing money on, they did everything they could to run up their traffic and and affiliate sales to try to sell the company. It worked, they landed Penthouse to buy it. A couple days later they reduce payouts from $130 a signup to $55. It didn't take rocket science to see what they were doing.

Penthouse. Another company with a history of failures (ibill ring a bell). They want to go public, they see that as their big pay day to take the company public but who wants to buy stock in a paper magazine company when that is becoming obsolete, so they need more of a web presence so they can give confidence to potential stock buyers that they are growing in the right direction and to beef up their profit / income / assets etc.

So Penthouse buys Various for the sole purpose of giving them enough legitimacy to take the company public.

Anyone notice that Various sold for only $500 million but included stock as well. For a company that claims it grossed 285 million last year with very low overhead, 500 million isn't a lot of money. I bet Penthouse "sold" Various on the idea that they would be going public and they would bank millions off of their stock.

Here is the problems I see:
1. what if the company doesn't go public, Various is going to feel fucked I am sure.
2. what if AFF/Cams legal issues catch up to them and start to sink penthouse and take them down with them.
3. In the situation above I wouldn't be surprised if you see Penthouse try to get out of the deal some kind of way.
4. In My Opinion both companies have been trying to puff up themselves to find a sucker to buy into it so they can make a huge payday. Various did this to land Penthouse, and Penthouse bought various to try to go public.

Penthouse has a terrible history of failures from what I have read, not a good track record. I will be surprised if this turns out the way Various or Penthouse expected.

Ofcourse this is all my opinion and we will see by the end of the year how all of this turns out.

gonzo
03-20-2008, 02:24 PM
LOL i love how they say 22 million active members but only 1.2 million were paying members. I would think the 1.2 million who paid is probably a more accurate number of the "real" people who use the site. I wonder how many of those 22 million active are fake profiles and people spamming. but 22 million does sound sexy.


Here is my thoughts on this, first posted here right now.

AFF / Cams bought all the ads they could, they offered payouts that they were losing money on, they did everything they could to run up their traffic and and affiliate sales to try to sell the company. It worked, they landed Penthouse to buy it. A couple days later they reduce payouts from $130 a signup to $55. It didn't take rocket science to see what they were doing.

Penthouse. Another company with a history of failures (ibill ring a bell). They want to go public, they see that as their big pay day to take the company public but who wants to buy stock in a paper magazine company when that is becoming obsolete, so they need more of a web presence so they can give confidence to potential stock buyers that they are growing in the right direction and to beef up their profit / income / assets etc.

So Penthouse buys Various for the sole purpose of giving them enough legitimacy to take the company public.

Anyone notice that Various sold for only $500 million but included stock as well. For a company that claims it grossed 285 million last year with very low overhead, 500 million isn't a lot of money. I bet Penthouse "sold" Various on the idea that they would be going public and they would bank millions off of their stock.

Here is the problems I see:
1. what if the company doesn't go public, Various is going to feel fucked I am sure.
2. what if AFF/Cams legal issues catch up to them and start to sink penthouse and take them down with them.
3. In the situation above I wouldn't be surprised if you see Penthouse try to get out of the deal some kind of way.
4. In My Opinion both companies have been trying to puff up themselves to find a sucker to buy into it so they can make a huge payday. Various did this to land Penthouse, and Penthouse bought various to try to go public.

Penthouse has a terrible history of failures from what I have read, not a good track record. I will be surprised if this turns out the way Various or Penthouse expected.

Ofcourse this is all my opinion and we will see by the end of the year how all of this turns out.

This theory has a ring to it. Like you said well know before the end of the year.

We are all still waiting on Sean from Streamray to get back from lunch.

EmporerEJ
03-20-2008, 05:05 PM
Told 'em...I'm still for sale.

22.6 million.

bluemoney
03-20-2008, 05:27 PM
Give Penthouse back to Bob Goocheee Goochee

RawAlex
03-20-2008, 06:03 PM
This theory has a ring to it. Like you said well know before the end of the year.

We are all still waiting on Sean from Streamray to get back from lunch.


It's been a very long lunch.

I am feeling that, in whole or in part, that the deal to take over the AFF properties was a move to get the whole package taken public. In my mind, a large part of the deal pays off if and when penthouse goes public again, bringing in a large amount of money to pay off debts (part of the purchase) and the vesting or value of shares that may have been granted to the Various partners.

Pure speculation, but I have a feeling that a large part of the purchase price was "financed" by the original owners, and if Penthouse is unable to go public in a certain amount of time, i suspect you will see the whole deal unravel pretty quickly.