KevinG
01-11-2008, 10:48 AM
For the past fifteen years, Internet service providers have acted - to use an old cliche - as wide-open information super-highways, letting data flow uninterrupted and unimpeded between users and the Internet. But ISPs may be about to embrace a new metaphor: traffic cop. At a small panel discussion about digital piracy here at NBC’s booth on the Consumer Electronics Show floor, representatives from NBC, Microsoft, several digital filtering companies and telecom giant AT&T said the time was right to start filtering for copyrighted content at the network level. Such filtering for pirated material already occurs on sites like YouTube and Microsoft’s Soapbox, and on some university networks. Network-level filtering means your Internet service provider – Comcast, AT&T, EarthLink, or whoever you send that monthly check to – could soon start sniffing your digital packets, looking for material that infringes on someone’s copyright. “What we are already doing to address piracy hasn’t been working. There’s no secret there,” said James Cicconi, senior vice president, external & legal affairs for AT&T. Mr. Cicconi said that AT&T has been talking to technology companies, and members of the MPAA and RIAA, for the last six months about implementing digital fingerprinting techniques on the network level. “We are very interested in a technology based solution and we think a network-based solution is the optimal way to approach this,” he said. “We recognize we are not there yet but there are a lot of promising technologies. But we are having an open discussion with a number of content companies, including NBC Universal, to try to explore various technologies that are out there.” Internet civil rights organizations oppose network-level filtering, arguing that it amounts to Big Brother monitoring of free speech, and that such filtering could block the use of material that may fall under fair-use legal provisions — uses like parody, which enrich our culture.
Full Story on The NY Times Tech Blog (http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/att-and-other-isps-may-be-getting-ready-to-filter/index.html)
Copyright infringement is bad.
However, this crap is not going to work.
Just look at email spam.
My junk box and filtered folders fill up with hundreds of spam emails every day, and I still get a handful slipping through.
At the same time LOTS of legitimate emails DO NOT get through because some isp 'thinks' it is spam when it is not.
Legit stuff gets caught in the trap, hindering business, while crap still gets through, putting a dent in productivity.
The same thing is going to happen here.
Full Story on The NY Times Tech Blog (http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/08/att-and-other-isps-may-be-getting-ready-to-filter/index.html)
Copyright infringement is bad.
However, this crap is not going to work.
Just look at email spam.
My junk box and filtered folders fill up with hundreds of spam emails every day, and I still get a handful slipping through.
At the same time LOTS of legitimate emails DO NOT get through because some isp 'thinks' it is spam when it is not.
Legit stuff gets caught in the trap, hindering business, while crap still gets through, putting a dent in productivity.
The same thing is going to happen here.