KevinG
11-27-2007, 11:02 AM
This is dumber than dumb.
A fraudulent misrepresentation can be made to a machine
"The point of principle which thus arises is whether it is possible in law to find a person liable in deceit if the fraudulent misrepresentation alleged was made not to a human being, but to a machine," wrote judge Richard Seymour QC.
This guy is a fucking moron.
Here's the whole stupid story:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/26/lying_2_computer_still_lying/
A fraudulent misrepresentation can be made to a machine
"The point of principle which thus arises is whether it is possible in law to find a person liable in deceit if the fraudulent misrepresentation alleged was made not to a human being, but to a machine," wrote judge Richard Seymour QC.
This guy is a fucking moron.
Here's the whole stupid story:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/26/lying_2_computer_still_lying/