PDA

View Full Version : I need all my weapons to protect myself from conservative terrorists


Winetalk.com
01-27-2006, 05:09 PM
First it was Pat Robertson, now it's Coulter
http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/27/coulter.stevens.ap/index.html

Have they all gone mad?

JoesHO
01-27-2006, 06:42 PM
They will finally fall.

Jace
01-27-2006, 07:07 PM
um...is this woman mad?

She drew more boos when she said the crack cocaine problem "has pretty much gone away."

why are people like that allowed to speak for everyone?

crack isn't gone away in the slightest, it is just overshadowed by the insane METH problem we have

JR
01-27-2006, 08:49 PM
They will finally fall.

has it really never occured to you that every argument has two sides? that both sides can be correct? or at least have valid arguments worth debate? your comments typically suggest that only those who think like you can possibly be correct.

Jace... people like that are allowed to say anything they want. just as you are. have you guys truly forgotten what this country is about?

Jace
01-27-2006, 08:54 PM
Jace... people like that are allowed to say anything they want. just as you are. have you guys truly forgotten what this country is about?

hell no, I never forget, and I never said they shouldn't be allowed to say shit, I just always wonder why the crazy people get all the airplay and the down to earth sane people never get aired

i guess crazy people just make for better news

Winetalk.com
01-27-2006, 11:04 PM
re: Last edited by Winetalk.com : 01-27-2006 at 10:48 PM.
JR, I haven't touch anything in your post, I am playing with the mess in the admin section per Gonzo's request and just testing some stuff.

test

PornoDoggy
01-27-2006, 11:10 PM
Where's the moral outrage?

Imagine, for just a minute, the Republican response to any known liberal/Democratic personality making the same remark about Thomas or Scalia. The hysterical histrionics would never end ...

JoesHO
01-27-2006, 11:52 PM
has it really never occured to you that every argument has two sides? that both sides can be correct? or at least have valid arguments worth debate? your comments typically suggest that only those who think like you can possibly be correct.

Jace... people like that are allowed to say anything they want. just as you are. have you guys truly forgotten what this country is about?


No that thought never occured to me , has it you ? :)

Vendzilla
01-28-2006, 10:33 AM
Won't be long now till we have civil unrest, I'm ready!

Winetalk.com
01-28-2006, 10:39 AM
reminder to myself:
don't mess with Vendzilla

JoesHO
01-28-2006, 10:42 AM
reminder to myself:
don't mess with Vendzilla


I think he has more weapons in his house than all of Iran and Iraq combined!

JR
01-28-2006, 01:15 PM
Won't be long now till we have civil unrest, I'm ready!
thats legal to own without a class 3 firearms license right? just occured to me that its not technically an automatic weapon.

CDSmith
01-28-2006, 01:19 PM
With all the focus lately on the war on terrorism, people forget that the war on conservatives is important too.

Actually, it's the war on idiots that concerns me most, of which several are known conservatives... but not all. Bandaid solution: drink more wine.

JoesHO
01-28-2006, 04:08 PM
With all the focus lately on the war on terrorism, people forget that the war on conservatives is important too.

Actually, it's the war on idiots that concerns me most, of which several are known conservatives... but not all. Bandaid solution: drink more wine.


gonzo can you translate that please ? sounds like he speaking with a southern dialect ( not exactly gonzoese, but similar )

Biggy
01-28-2006, 07:53 PM
many conservative republicans talk like this. its their insatiable quest for power, and their desire to make everybody be like them. they do a good job of convincing middle america... as they rob them blind and keep them poor to line their own pockets. the poor are too stupid to realize, blindly following the faith of "god." as the rich get richer through lower taxes. its sad really...

im still trying to figure out from the elections how a man with no military experience can come out smelling sweeter than a man who served, or why changing your mind on an issue (aka "flip flopping") is a bad idea. buy a stock or investment, make a decision to hold it no matter what, and never change your mind on it as new info surfaces - we will see how quickly you lose money.

PornoDoggy
01-28-2006, 10:24 PM
many conservative republicans talk like this. its their insatiable quest for power, and their desire to make everybody be like them. they do a good job of convincing middle america... as they rob them blind and keep them poor to line their own pockets. the poor are too stupid to realize, blindly following the faith of "god." as the rich get richer through lower taxes. its sad really...

im still trying to figure out from the elections how a man with no military experience can come out smelling sweeter than a man who served, or why changing your mind on an issue (aka "flip flopping") is a bad idea. buy a stock or investment, make a decision to hold it no matter what, and never change your mind on it as new info surfaces - we will see how quickly you lose money.
I have to take exception to the idea that GW has "no" military experience.

GW joined the Air National Guard in 1966 (+/-). After regular flight training he was assigned to a squadron with planes too obsolete to fight in either Vietnam on the the frontiers of the Cold War.

Now, remember - this is the Air National Guard of the Vietnam Era. This is not the Guard as we know it today. Positions in the guard, reserve, and U.S. Coast Guard were hard to come by, unless, of course, you had a daddy who was a Congressman from Texas favored by LBJ in spite of being from the other party. At times in Iraq 60% of the forces serving in theater have been Guard/Reserves. Something less than 10,000 Guard and Reservists IN TOTAL served in Vietnam between 1964 - 1975. Most estimates I've read suggest that close to 5,000,000 personnel rotated in and out.

[note - something less that 10,000 reservists were activated from reserve status and sent to Vietnam. There were millions of enlisted personnel and thousands of officers who signed up for the reserves (either for a shorter period of active service, or for a college education, flight school, etc. There service in Vietnam, while technically as reservists, was during the period of obligated service and should not be confused with being activated from civiliian life).

So my point is simple. GW has military experience. He learned his lessons well.

Get yourself in a nice safe place, wrap yourself in a flag, and and let somebody else go fight.

gonzo
01-29-2006, 04:06 AM
gonzo can you translate that please ? sounds like he speaking with a southern dialect ( not exactly gonzoese, but similar )

I think hes looking for the local GWAR concert.

Winetalk.com
01-29-2006, 06:18 AM
Biggy, you economic thoeries are just naive. BOTH parties get into power for the exact same reason -
to make money and Republicans and not any different than Democrats, Communists, Social Democrats, Taliban, etc,etc, etc..
Politics is about one thing and one thing only:
Redistribution of wealth!

LadyMischief
01-29-2006, 09:32 AM
I think some big black guy with a 12 inch cock needs to fuck Anne Coulter silly.. might loosen her up again, perhaps allow oxygen back into her brain again.

Vendzilla
01-29-2006, 11:33 AM
thats legal to own without a class 3 firearms license right? just occured to me that its not technically an automatic weapon. It's perfectly legal to own and fire, I have more problems with my AR-15 than the gattling gun, the ar is on the california assault ban list list, because it has a pistol grip, yet I have a M-1 carbine that shoots just as many bullets, bigger bullets and has a bayonette on it and it's not on the ban list, because it doesn't have a pistol grip? this state is weird!

Vendzilla
01-29-2006, 11:35 AM
I think he has more weapons in his house than all of Iran and Iraq combined! I haven't bought any lately, thinking of getting into "cowboy shooting"

Biggy
01-29-2006, 06:25 PM
Biggy, you economic thoeries are just naive. BOTH parties get into power for the exact same reason -
to make money and Republicans and not any different than Democrats, Communists, Social Democrats, Taliban, etc,etc, etc..
Politics is about one thing and one thing only:
Redistribution of wealth!

nothing you said isn't true, but theres varying degrees to it. when republicans are in power, the gap between rich and poor widens vs what would've happened with kerry, not that that alone is a bad thing. i'd be remiss in saying its a republican thing, right now its a republican thing. its a product of republicans controlling the executive, legislative, and now the judiciary branches of gov't. if democrats controlled all 3, the same shit would probably happen. i'd be much more comfortable right now with a democratic president, a republican legislation body, and a split judiciary branch.

it just bothers me that republicans use dirty tactics to get in power by convincing those they prey on through moral and religious values. i like it when the checks and balances actually work how they should. middle america is clueless, they blindly follow religion, and republicans have done a successful, and extremely dirty job of painting all liberals as hippies to get their way.

Biggy
01-29-2006, 06:47 PM
btw, i would vote republican if there was a good candidate, and if there was diversity in the control of power between all 3 branches. and so long as morals and religion took a backseat to much more important issues like foriegn and domestic policy.

but i bet many conservative republicans would label me as a liberal...

JoesHO
01-29-2006, 07:06 PM
btw, i would vote republican if there was a good candidate, and if there was diversity in the control of power between all 3 branches. and so long as morals and religion took a backseat to much more important issues like foriegn and domestic policy.

but i bet many conservative republicans would label me as a liberal...

I think Hagel is a good republican, and guliani is a good one, and McCain is tolerable and so is spector .

and I also think dems like
Lieberman ought to just switch sides and get out of the sheeps clothing

PornoDoggy
01-30-2006, 01:04 AM
The odd alignment of the parties is nothing new in American politics.

The Democratic majority in Congress between 1932 and the 1970s was an odd collection of very leftist Eastern and Northern liberals and some downright reactionary, blatantly racist Southerners.

Nixon began, and Reagan completed, a process of attracting certain elements from the Democratic party, with an emphasis on the South, which has helped created the Republican majority today.

I can remember Republicans in the 60s (New York Mayor John Lindsay and Illinois Senator Charles Percy, in particular) who would have no place in today's Republican Party. Many centerist and moderate Republicans have left that party as well.

I can conceive of circumstances where I could vote for McCain or Hegel. Spector is too old, and (without taking anything away from a brilliant, heroic effort in New York City on and after 9/11) I wouldn't trust Gulliani with national office.

CDSmith
01-31-2006, 12:26 AM
I think some big black guy with a 12 inch cock needs to fuck Anne Coulter silly.. might loosen her up again, perhaps allow oxygen back into her brain again.I would almost pay to see that. Coulter vs the Dogfart boys. :yowsa:

Or wait to see the vid posted on the boards.


ooyeah