2257 live from san diego

[gonzo]

Clyde dewitt
"This law was created to harass this industry.'
"This is about Bush and God"

Jd odenburger
"The day of reckoning is at hand"
"There will be no certain answe as a result of the injunction"
"Ther will be greater confusion than today"

[Trev]

I'd hate to be an American!

[Inabon]

welcome to 1990's for the rest of the non usa people.

[gonzo]

Originally posted by Trev@Jun 15 2005, 06:25 PM
I'd hate to be an American!
JD odenbuger says your not exempt either.

[Dravyk]

Ask them if we can sue content providers who won't give up-to-date 2257 info to a purchaser. And what about the responsibility of a content provider who no longer sells? (Afterall they still are required to keep their copies of all records for 10 years.)

Seriously. Would like to hear one of the lawyers give us our full options.

(Btw, no this hasn't happened to me. Just want to be ready when it does.)

[Lee]

Originally posted by gonzo+Jun 15 2005, 04:38 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gonzo @ Jun 15 2005, 04:38 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 15 2005, 06:25 PM
I'd hate to be an American!
JD odenbuger says your not exempt either. [/b][/quote]
JD Hamburger wants Trev as a client to? Now there is a shock-horror, surprise :o

I guess adult attorneys will take cash from pretty much anyone :yowsa:

[Paul Markham]

Originally posted by Dravyk@Jun 15 2005, 05:01 PM
Ask them if we can sue content providers who won't give up-to-date 2257 info to a purchaser. And what about the responsibility of a content provider who no longer sells? (Afterall they still are required to keep their copies of all records for 10 years.)

Seriously. Would like to hear one of the lawyers give us our full options.

(Btw, no this hasn't happened to me. Just want to be ready when it does.)
It's actually against the law now for a content producer to not give the documents out. However it's not against the law for the producer to stop a sponsor from giving out documents.

But anyone who bought content without 2257 documentation will get little sympathy from me. Sorry to harsh but the buying motives of some with content, they deserve to have to delete it.

So many were buying on price from anyone who was offering a deal, they forced the prices down to a level where it became unprofitable, they bought from people who frankly were not the most straight of people. All this to drive down the prices of the one product we sell PORN.

Now these buyers are moaning because the guy has not got 2257 compliant paperwork, gone out of business or simply can't be found.

And even now I'm being told XZY in Russia will do it cheaper, so why won't I drop my price? Go buy from him and see what it get's you.

2257 is the shit hitting the fan, some are standing in front of it naked and some are standing their in a raincoat with an umbrella. That protection was paid for.

[Dravyk]

Originally posted by Paul Markham@Jun 16 2005, 12:14 AM
But anyone who bought content without 2257 documentation will get little sympathy from me.
For what it's worth, Paul, I'm talking about people who bought content that was compliant to the old rules, but is lacking under the new rules.

That is a huge difference from what you are saying, which is people having bought content previously that had no 2257 work attached.

[Lee]

http://www.bunnypancake.com

[gonzo]

Paul is a lawyer now.

[Trev]

Originally posted by gonzo+Jun 16 2005, 01:38 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (gonzo @ Jun 16 2005, 01:38 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 15 2005, 06:25 PM
I'd hate to be an American!
JD odenbuger says your not exempt either. [/b][/quote]
JD can suck my nads... I know where I stand legally :)

[Lee]

Originally posted by Trev+Jun 16 2005, 12:10 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Trev @ Jun 16 2005, 12:10 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 16 2005, 01:38 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 15 2005, 06:25 PM
I'd hate to be an American!
JD odenbuger says your not exempt either.
JD can suck my nads... I know where I stand legally :) [/b][/quote]
But so does Mr Hamburger... Alledgedy ;)

[Trev]

Originally posted by Lee+Jun 16 2005, 02:30 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lee @ Jun 16 2005, 02:30 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 15 2005, 04:38 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 15 2005, 06:25 PM
I'd hate to be an American!
JD odenbuger says your not exempt either.
JD Hamburger wants Trev as a client to? Now there is a shock-horror, surprise :o

I guess adult attorneys will take cash from pretty much anyone :yowsa: [/b][/quote]
I'll stick to my own guys:
http://www.dickinson-dees.com/.

They actually know what the fuck they're talking about :)

[Trev]

Originally posted by Lee+Jun 16 2005, 09:11 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lee @ Jun 16 2005, 09:11 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by Trev@Jun 16 2005, 12:10 AM
Originally posted by gonzo@Jun 16 2005, 01:38 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Trev@Jun 15 2005, 06:25 PM
I'd hate to be an American!
JD odenbuger says your not exempt either.
JD can suck my nads... I know where I stand legally :)
But so does Mr Hamburger... Alledgedy ;) [/b][/quote]
:lol:

Allegedly :)

[Lee]

Same here:

http://www.cliffordchance.com

Good peoples and i actually first err.. 'met' them when they tried to sue me for squatting on a Cadburys related domain LOL

I had to bestow on them the fact that 'flake' was a word in the dictionary which kinda shut them up and earned my business in the process :lol:

[Trev]

Originally posted by Lee@Jun 16 2005, 09:16 AM
Same here:

http://www.cliffordchance.com

Good peoples and i actually first err.. 'met' them when they tried to sue me for squatting on a Cadburys related domain LOL

I had to bestow on them the fact that 'flake' was a word in the dictionary which kinda shut them up and earned my business in the process :lol:
Hahahaha :lol:

Always retain the ones that come after you because most of the time they're the ones worth having :wnw:

[Dravyk]

Eh, my lawyer's better than yours! And he can fly too!

http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/365/365710p1.html

[Lee]

Originally posted by Dravyk@Jun 16 2005, 12:44 AM
Eh, my lawyer's better than yours! And he can fly too!

http://filmforce.ign.com/articles/365/365710p1.html
Hahahaha

I thought you still used cousin Vinny? ;)

[gigi]

Originally posted by Paul Markham+Jun 15 2005, 09:14 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Paul Markham @ Jun 15 2005, 09:14 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Dravyk@Jun 15 2005, 05:01 PM
Ask them if we can sue content providers who won't give up-to-date 2257 info to a purchaser. And what about the responsibility of a content provider who no longer sells? (Afterall they still are required to keep their copies of all records for 10 years.)

Seriously. Would like to hear one of the lawyers give us our full options.

(Btw, no this hasn't happened to me. Just want to be ready when it does.)
It's actually against the law now for a content producer to not give the documents out. However it's not against the law for the producer to stop a sponsor from giving out documents.

But anyone who bought content without 2257 documentation will get little sympathy from me. Sorry to harsh but the buying motives of some with content, they deserve to have to delete it.

So many were buying on price from anyone who was offering a deal, they forced the prices down to a level where it became unprofitable, they bought from people who frankly were not the most straight of people. All this to drive down the prices of the one product we sell PORN.

Now these buyers are moaning because the guy has not got 2257 compliant paperwork, gone out of business or simply can't be found.

And even now I'm being told XZY in Russia will do it cheaper, so why won't I drop my price? Go buy from him and see what it get's you.

2257 is the shit hitting the fan, some are standing in front of it naked and some are standing their in a raincoat with an umbrella. That protection was paid for. [/b][/quote]
Paul,

I'm guessing you will be changing your 2257 info on this page then?

http://www.bargainbasementcontent.com/faq.php#2257

USC18 & 2257
You are the person displaying the images and therefore should have the documents. With every set we supply IDs and a model release, with the contact details removed.