sarettah
03-09-2005, 08:43 AM
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=21620
Utah senate orders internet porn switched off
Think of the children
By Nick Farrell: Monday 07 March 2005, 07:02
THE UTAH SENATE has approved legislation that will force ISPs to ban certain web sites that are defined as 'harmful to children'.
Basically that includes any site that fits into a Utah senator's definition of pornography, which we understand is quite wide.
To make matters worse, the law will force search engines and even email providers not to display porn or face prosecution.
The law is being considered by the newly elected Republican governor Jon Huntsman. If it is approved, chances are it will be immediately challenged under the US constitution.
Apparently the US founding fathers had a problem with people imposing the same strict censorship of the interweb as enjoyed by China.
Supporters of the Utah bill, such as advocacy group Citizens Against Pornography, have called for this type of censorship to "give parents more control of their home Internet connections". Surely 'more control' doesn't mean more state control.
Installing web filters at home and packing their children off to bible class would be more useful than banning the Interweb for the rest of the universe.
Understandably the law is not universally loved by the good people of Utah. According to the Daily Herald editorial column, which slams the law for being against the first amendment, here, "creating a registry of Utah-based adult sites will not stop anybody from accessing online sex any more than standing chest deep in the Colorado River will stop its rush toward the Gulf of California. It's a pointless exercise, however well meaning." And there's more, here.
.................................................. ..
Utah senate orders internet porn switched off
Think of the children
By Nick Farrell: Monday 07 March 2005, 07:02
THE UTAH SENATE has approved legislation that will force ISPs to ban certain web sites that are defined as 'harmful to children'.
Basically that includes any site that fits into a Utah senator's definition of pornography, which we understand is quite wide.
To make matters worse, the law will force search engines and even email providers not to display porn or face prosecution.
The law is being considered by the newly elected Republican governor Jon Huntsman. If it is approved, chances are it will be immediately challenged under the US constitution.
Apparently the US founding fathers had a problem with people imposing the same strict censorship of the interweb as enjoyed by China.
Supporters of the Utah bill, such as advocacy group Citizens Against Pornography, have called for this type of censorship to "give parents more control of their home Internet connections". Surely 'more control' doesn't mean more state control.
Installing web filters at home and packing their children off to bible class would be more useful than banning the Interweb for the rest of the universe.
Understandably the law is not universally loved by the good people of Utah. According to the Daily Herald editorial column, which slams the law for being against the first amendment, here, "creating a registry of Utah-based adult sites will not stop anybody from accessing online sex any more than standing chest deep in the Colorado River will stop its rush toward the Gulf of California. It's a pointless exercise, however well meaning." And there's more, here.
.................................................. ..