Red / depraveddollars

[Nickatilynx]

So I've been wandering round other peoples affiliate programs , as one does :)

and I have to ask...


http://www.depraveddollars.com

So I look at it , it seems amateur porn and lots of interracial content I have never seen before.

Even the design of the sites one could say they are "different".

Now I know those sorta "homemade" designed site can do pretty well , hell I had one and it did.
So I check out :

http://www.playfullhousewives.com/

On the first page there is a link to:
cumdump and fetishvideos

click the enter button..
link to
fetichvideos
pick-a-interracial

Then click for the tour..

Then at least 15 links off to other sites and toplists and stuff.

Am I being dense here? Remember I am Old ;-))

But with all those traffic leaks , who would send traffic to it?

[DrGuile]

In a per-signup program, its arguable that this is ok.



In a partnership, it just doesnt make much sense....




(and would keep me away, not that I mean much traffic-wise)

[Red]

those are things I have been discussing with my partner. The link to cum dump is another one of our sites and the affiliates cookies carry through for them. Same for any of the banners that go to our other sites.

The auto ranks are something we're working on. The sites have been up for a few years and sales coming from the autoranks have been bringing in a lot of money. I've been told as the affiliate sales increase, the auto ranks will be dropped and/or replaced with our own autorank pages which we feature our sites and cookies will carry through.

We do have a separate landing page for the affiliates that eliminates the consoles, so we have been working on the leaks and will continue to do so.

As far as the "homegrown look" The sites will be going through a face lift. In fact Playfull is the first on the list. We'll still keep an amateur look, because it's been working for years, but we are going to fix them up a little.

[Nickatilynx]

Originally posted by Red@Feb 11 2005, 06:50 PM
those are things I have been discussing with my partner. The link to cum dump is another one of our sites and the affiliates cookies carry through for them. Same for any of the banners that go to our other sites.

The auto ranks are something we're working on. The sites have been up for a few years and sales coming from the autoranks have been bringing in a lot of money. I've been told as the affiliate sales increase, the auto ranks will be dropped and/or replaced with our own autorank pages which we feature our sites and cookies will carry through.

We do have a separate landing page for the affiliates that eliminates the consoles, so we have been working on the leaks and will continue to do so.

As far as the "homegrown look" The sites will be going through a face lift. In fact Playfull is the first on the list. We'll still keep an amateur look, because it's been working for years, but we are going to fix them up a little.
:okthumb:

My questions are answered.

Damn! :)

[Red]

Originally posted by Nickatilynx+Feb 11 2005, 06:59 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Nickatilynx @ Feb 11 2005, 06:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Red@Feb 11 2005, 06:50 PM
those are things I have been discussing with my partner. The link to cum dump is another one of our sites and the affiliates cookies carry through for them. Same for any of the banners that go to our other sites.

The auto ranks are something we're working on. The sites have been up for a few years and sales coming from the autoranks have been bringing in a lot of money. I've been told as the affiliate sales increase, the auto ranks will be dropped and/or replaced with our own autorank pages which we feature our sites and cookies will carry through.

We do have a separate landing page for the affiliates that eliminates the consoles, so we have been working on the leaks and will continue to do so.

As far as the "homegrown look" The sites will be going through a face lift. In fact Playfull is the first on the list. We'll still keep an amateur look, because it's been working for years, but we are going to fix them up a little.
:okthumb:

My questions are answered.

Damn! :) [/b][/quote]
Hot damn, I made it through a grilling by Nick. :)

For a minute there, I thought I was going to have to drop you from the orgy invite list.

[Sabby]

Why dont ya just spin your toplist traffic through a seperate doorway / tour and keep your tour for affiliates leak free.

Feeding toplists with affiliate traffic isnt nice to your affiliates. I would definately not send any traffic to this.


Sabby:)

[Nickatilynx]

Originally posted by Sabby@Feb 11 2005, 07:49 PM
Why dont ya just spin your toplist traffic through a seperate doorway / tour and keep your tour for affiliates leak free.

Feeding toplists with affiliate traffic isnt nice to your affiliates. I would definately not send any traffic to this.


Sabby:)
:inlove:

[Red]

Originally posted by Sabby@Feb 11 2005, 07:49 PM
Why dont ya just spin your toplist traffic through a seperate doorway / tour and keep your tour for affiliates leak free.

Feeding toplists with affiliate traffic isnt nice to your affiliates. I would definately not send any traffic to this.


Sabby:)
I'm working on that Sabby. We got rid of the consoles for the affiliate entry, next step is the toplists.

[Nickatilynx]

Originally posted by Red+Feb 11 2005, 07:53 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Red @ Feb 11 2005, 07:53 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Sabby@Feb 11 2005, 07:49 PM
Why dont ya just spin your toplist traffic through a seperate doorway / tour and keep your tour for affiliates leak free.

Feeding toplists with affiliate traffic isnt nice to your affiliates. I would definately not send any traffic to this.


Sabby:)
I'm working on that Sabby. We got rid of the consoles for the affiliate entry, next step is the toplists. [/b][/quote]
Seriously and I'm not trying to piss...BUT...

holy fuck if you can get 52 affiliates to send you traffic....

basically to feed yr toplists I shudder at how dumb those affiliates are...

[TheEnforcer]

Originally posted by Nickatilynx+Feb 11 2005, 10:59 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Nickatilynx @ Feb 11 2005, 10:59 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by Red@Feb 11 2005, 07:53 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Sabby@Feb 11 2005, 07:49 PM
Why dont ya just spin your toplist traffic through a seperate doorway / tour and keep your tour for affiliates leak free.

Feeding toplists with affiliate traffic isnt nice to your affiliates. I would definately not send any traffic to this.


Sabby:)
I'm working on that Sabby. We got rid of the consoles for the affiliate entry, next step is the toplists.
Seriously and I'm not trying to piss...BUT...

holy fuck if you can get 52 affiliates to send you traffic....

basically to feed yr toplists I shudder at how dumb those affiliates are... [/b][/quote]
Good ole PT Barnum said it best...... :)

Would make it awfully tempting to keep it that way! :agrin: Can't rape the willing as they say and those are there links are there for all to see so no one can complain about it. If you don't check it yourself you have no cause to complain later on cause she's obviously not trying to hide it!

[Nickatilynx]

However....

The GOOD thing is....

1.) You are Oprano family..
2.) these sites obviously convert decent.
3.)The sites will only get better , as you are aware of the highlighted faults and all your answers are very professional and very aware.
4.) You've found 52 people to send traffic effectively to yr toplist....lol ...and people think I'm sharp??? ;-)))

You impress me :)

The sites , at the moment,......well never mind. :)

But seriously I really don't think any Opranauts would send traffic until they are fixed up , Opranauts tend not to send traffic to a toplist link list ;-)))

[Mike AI]

If they would seal leaks in tour, I bet they would get much more traffic.

[Sabby]

Originally posted by DrGuile@Feb 11 2005, 12:03 PM
In a per-signup program, its arguable that this is ok.



In a partnership, it just doesnt make much sense....




(and would keep me away, not that I mean much traffic-wise)
Per-signup... no.

If you pay per click it wouldnt matter though.


Sabby:)

[pushpills]

Originally posted by Sabby+Feb 12 2005, 01:28 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Sabby @ Feb 12 2005, 01:28 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-DrGuile@Feb 11 2005, 12:03 PM
In a per-signup program, its arguable that this is ok.



In a partnership, it just doesnt make much sense....




(and would keep me away, not that I mean much traffic-wise)
Per-signup... no.

If you pay per click it wouldnt matter though.


Sabby:) [/b][/quote]
well i think he's saying that with per signup they are gonna send the traffic around thru exits and stuff...yea i still wouldnt like it but with per signup "its arguable that this is ok."


i wouldnt send my revshare traffic to that, I can tell you that for sure.

[Sabby]

Originally posted by pushpills+Feb 12 2005, 03:07 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (pushpills @ Feb 12 2005, 03:07 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by Sabby@Feb 12 2005, 01:28 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-DrGuile@Feb 11 2005, 12:03 PM
In a per-signup program, its arguable that this is ok.



In a partnership, it just doesnt make much sense....




(and would keep me away, not that I mean much traffic-wise)
Per-signup... no.

If you pay per click it wouldnt matter though.


Sabby:)
well i think he's saying that with per signup they are gonna send the traffic around thru exits and stuff...yea i still wouldnt like it but with per signup "its arguable that this is ok."


i wouldnt send my revshare traffic to that, I can tell you that for sure. [/b][/quote]
But they dont just have exits though...

They have actual outlinks to toplists and shit scattered throughout their entire tours.


Sabby:)

[Red]

Like I said guys, It is being worked on. The sites have been up for years, the affiliate program is only 2 1/2 weeks old. I'm going to make sure this subject is addressed with my partner and I'll keep you informed as to the changes.

[Winetalk.com]

from what I understood in a brief reading,
tour needs plugs and Nick needs a butt plug,
am I correct?

[Red]

Originally posted by Winetalk.com@Feb 12 2005, 05:49 AM
from what I understood in a brief reading,
tour needs plugs and Nick needs a butt plug,
am I correct?
Serge,

Have I told you today that I love you?

[Trev]

Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Feb 11 2005, 05:49 PM
So I've been wandering round other peoples affiliate programs , as one does :)

and I have to ask...


http://www.depraveddollars.com

So I look at it , it seems amateur porn and lots of interracial content I have never seen before.

Even the design of the sites one could say they are "different".

Now I know those sorta "homemade" designed site can do pretty well , hell I had one and it did.
So I check out :

http://www.playfullhousewives.com/

On the first page there is a link to:
cumdump and fetishvideos

click the enter button..
link to
fetichvideos
pick-a-interracial

Then click for the tour..

Then at least 15 links off to other sites and toplists and stuff.

Am I being dense here? Remember I am Old ;-))

But with all those traffic leaks , who would send traffic to it?
Has it changed since this?


I see traffic being sent offsite but is the credit going to the webmasters?

[MorganGrayson]

Originally posted by Winetalk.com@Feb 12 2005, 05:49 AM
from what I understood in a brief reading,
tour needs plugs and Nick needs a butt plug,
am I correct?
Hello, Serge!!!! :bwave: :bdance: :bjump:

Red...please don't drop Nickatilynx from the orgy invite list. I have an extremely impressive strap-on still in the box for the occasion! :P