PDA

View Full Version : New Purecash Non-Nude tours


Weg Cory
10-15-2004, 12:36 PM
Webmasters,

I am pleased to announce that, in our ongoing effort to bring you the highest quality marketing materials the industry has to offer, the Purecash team has added 6 new Non-Nude tours. The tours can be accessed by simply selecting tour 2 in the following sites:

Emma-grant.com
Tristan-king.com
Tara-james.com
Petite-tina.com
Sweetlilblonde.com
Totallychrissy.com

These tours are an excellent way to promote our array of high-quality single girl sites. With payouts of up to $35, you can't go wrong.

Please let us know if you have any questions and we will be happy to assist you.

Thanks and Best Regards,

Cory.

SykkBoy
10-15-2004, 01:42 PM
Do you guys have non-nude galleries to promote them with as well?
or non-nude galleries in general?

Weg Cory
10-15-2004, 01:56 PM
Not at the moment.

You need some?

Mike AI
10-15-2004, 02:17 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy@Oct 15 2004, 12:43 PM
Do you guys have non-nude galleries to promote them with as well?
or non-nude galleries in general?
They are being worked on.

Enterprising young men would make their own, or modify existing galleries to hop on the NN bandwagon. These sites are converting very well with NN traffic. It is an untapped resource.

SykkBoy
10-15-2004, 03:55 PM
Originally posted by Mike AI+Oct 15 2004, 01:18 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mike AI @ Oct 15 2004, 01:18 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy@Oct 15 2004, 12:43 PM
Do you guys have non-nude galleries to promote them with as well?
or non-nude galleries in general?
They are being worked on.

Enterprising young men would make their own, or modify existing galleries to hop on the NN bandwagon. These sites are converting very well with NN traffic. It is an untapped resource. [/b][/quote]
nice
I have a little NN project near launch, I'll make some up and see how they do

edit - I wasn't aware we could modify existing galleries :)

Mike AI
10-15-2004, 04:03 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy+Oct 15 2004, 02:56 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (SykkBoy @ Oct 15 2004, 02:56 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by Mike AI@Oct 15 2004, 01:18 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy@Oct 15 2004, 12:43 PM
Do you guys have non-nude galleries to promote them with as well?
or non-nude galleries in general?
They are being worked on.

Enterprising young men would make their own, or modify existing galleries to hop on the NN bandwagon. These sites are converting very well with NN traffic. It is an untapped resource.
nice
I have a little NN project near launch, I'll make some up and see how they do

edit - I wasn't aware we could modify existing galleries :) [/b][/quote]


Sykk, for family we work a little harder!

Let me know when you do anything in NN, it is an area we are developing as well.
Stan has some projects he is working on!

SykkBoy
10-15-2004, 04:11 PM
Originally posted by Mike AI+Oct 15 2004, 03:04 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mike AI @ Oct 15 2004, 03:04 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Originally posted by SykkBoy@Oct 15 2004, 02:56 PM
Originally posted by Mike AI@Oct 15 2004, 01:18 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy@Oct 15 2004, 12:43 PM
Do you guys have non-nude galleries to promote them with as well?
or non-nude galleries in general?
They are being worked on.

Enterprising young men would make their own, or modify existing galleries to hop on the NN bandwagon. These sites are converting very well with NN traffic. It is an untapped resource.
nice
I have a little NN project near launch, I'll make some up and see how they do

edit - I wasn't aware we could modify existing galleries :)


Sykk, for family we work a little harder!

Let me know when you do anything in NN, it is an area we are developing as well.
Stan has some projects he is working on! [/b][/quote]
I'll definitely be in touch
it's not exactly anything earth shatteringly new, just a little variation on things that have worked in the past

RawAlex
10-16-2004, 10:45 PM
Mike, isn't the term "non-nude" a nice way of pandering to the KP crowd? Keep the girl covered, don't talk about her age, use younger looking models, etc?

Pretty much every non-nude site I have ever seen submitted to my link sites is always one click away from KP or "Molly model" sites.

Just wondering?

Alex

Peaches
10-16-2004, 10:54 PM
Originally posted by RawAlex@Oct 16 2004, 10:46 PM
Mike, isn't the term "non-nude" a nice way of pandering to the KP crowd? Keep the girl covered, don't talk about her age, use younger looking models, etc?

Pretty much every non-nude site I have ever seen submitted to my link sites is always one click away from KP or "Molly model" sites.

Just wondering?

Alex
Hardly.

Ya complain about too much free porn, now you complain we're not giving enough skin ;)

RawAlex
10-16-2004, 11:50 PM
Peaches, no, not at all. I wish we could all sell porn with nothing but words and suggestion... that ain't the issue.

Mike was one of the people big all over CCBill in the day for hosting "non nude model" sites, which featured many girls under 18 in sexy poses, the legality of which is another debate.

Most of the major NN sites out there link and promote these "younger" girls. Every one I have every had submitted to me was one click away from a "molly model" site or "teen nudist" sites.

Just wondering if this is a good marketing tool or just another shimmy down the slope...

Alex

SykkBoy
10-17-2004, 12:31 AM
Alex, the NN scene is super clean now.
nearly all of the borderline KP stuff is gone (unfortunately, there are a few who still want to walk that line, but they seem to have disappeared from the scene).

I was also very critical of it in the day, but I see that it has been cleaned up and I'm seeing a lot of amazing numbers submitting non-nude galleries, sites, etc.

Opti
10-17-2004, 12:46 AM
Originally posted by Peaches+Oct 17 2004, 12:55 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Peaches @ Oct 17 2004, 12:55 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-RawAlex@Oct 16 2004, 10:46 PM
Mike, isn't the term "non-nude" a nice way of pandering to the KP crowd? Keep the girl covered, don't talk about her age, use younger looking models, etc?

Pretty much every non-nude site I have ever seen submitted to my link sites is always one click away from KP or "Molly model" sites.

Just wondering?

Alex
Hardly.

Ya complain about too much free porn, now you complain we're not giving enough skin ;) [/b][/quote]
I'm working on a softcore focus traffic project at the moment Peaches.. and didn't even consider covering the niche I think of as "non-nude", for the same reason Alex outlined.

But I'm pretty sure it's just a perception issue here... as the Purecash non-nude tours are probably closer to what I (and probably Alex) would call Softcore Tours or even R-Rated tours rather than "non-nude".

I have to admit I kind of wondered if someone there thought it might attract webmaster traffic from that borderline market Alex talks about when I saw the name myself.

cj
10-17-2004, 02:36 AM
I think the problem with it is the choice of name for the niche ...

'non nude' is something we all identify with borderline KP ...

what not call it the 'semi clothed' niche or any number of other terms which describe what it is, without making us all think of teen nudist sites?

Peaches
10-17-2004, 09:48 AM
IMO, if you call it softcore you think of nudes with no pinkage. Call it censored and you think of starred or blurred nipples and/or pinkage and/or penetration. They're called non-nude tours because, quite frankly, that's what they are. I've not ever heard the semi-clothed description for tours and galleries, but I have seen and heard hundreds of webmasters over the past few months looking for NN galleries and tours and talking about how well they convert for sites that aren't even close to KP.

We are marketing NN tours to webmasters. Webmasters who have specifically been asking for non-nude tours and galleries. Webmasters who hopefully know that Purecash doesn't involve itself in anything that even might be misconstrued as KP. :unsure:

Mike AI
10-17-2004, 11:19 AM
Originally posted by RawAlex@Oct 16 2004, 09:46 PM
Mike, isn't the term "non-nude" a nice way of pandering to the KP crowd? Keep the girl covered, don't talk about her age, use younger looking models, etc?

Pretty much every non-nude site I have ever seen submitted to my link sites is always one click away from KP or "Molly model" sites.

Just wondering?

Alex


Alex, I disagree.

The original non-nude people would put up models who were UNDER 18, and have them dress like adults in skimpy outfits. Mnay times these girls were 12-14, and processed by CCBill.

Today's non-nude marketplace is much different.

We are offering non-nude tours for webmasters to promote, the sites are still the normal sites - members areas are the same.

Some people will only send traffic to these type of sites - find out what the requirments from Hustler to get on their exit consoles. They are extremely strict.

There are also a bunch of link lists, TGPs, and other resources that only link to non-nude tours. By building these tours it alows or webmasters to target these resources for traffic.

Alex, surely you know me well enough to know my stances on critical issues like this.... At the time the under age thign as going on, I was the most vocal critic of them and CCBill or processin for them.

Mike AI
10-17-2004, 11:22 AM
CJ you make a good point about terms, but I think we should take back the term from the CP scum.

ALL models we shoot, including some we are shooting for future non-nude sites are over 18.

Sometimes it is easier recruiting models when they do not get nude. Not every chick is ready to take off their clothes for the camera. Plus we pay models less as well for doing non-nude.

If you can come up with a better term, I am all ears.

RawAlex
10-17-2004, 11:42 AM
Mike, I am sorry, but you cannot "take back" a term that has been attached to the KP marketplace for so long. Even most of the current adult webmasters who have developed NN sites do so with models that are hard to determine age on. They are not doing mature NN. They are doing teen NN, they avoid talking about age on the websites, and let it play to pedophiles preferences. Many of the sources of traffic, the NN top lists and such end up usually one click from true KP.

Want to post up some tour links so we can enjoy?

Alex

Mike AI
10-17-2004, 01:16 PM
Originally posted by RawAlex@Oct 17 2004, 10:43 AM
Mike, I am sorry, but you cannot "take back" a term that has been attached to the KP marketplace for so long. Even most of the current adult webmasters who have developed NN sites do so with models that are hard to determine age on. They are not doing mature NN. They are doing teen NN, they avoid talking about age on the websites, and let it play to pedophiles preferences. Many of the sources of traffic, the NN top lists and such end up usually one click from true KP.

Want to post up some tour links so we can enjoy?

Alex


Alex, you should know me better. There is a distinct group of NN webmasters that have NOTHING to do with KP. My stance has always been clear on these issues.


Here are the tours:

http://www.purecash.biz/nn_tours/EG/
http://www.purecash.biz/nn_tours/PT/
http://www.purecash.biz/nn_tours/SLB/
http://www.purecash.biz/nn_tours/TC/
http://www.purecash.biz/nn_tours/TJ/
http://www.purecash.biz/nn_tours/TK/

SykkBoy
10-17-2004, 01:39 PM
while we haven't gone non-nude on our tours yet, we have added non-nude galleries to our hostedgalleries and while they aren't used as much as the regular galleries, the ratios are much better

the tour for our busty site is softcore as is most fo the content inside of the site, so it does very well with NN traffic.

CJ, your Celebrity site would be HUGE in the NN scene. I bet it would be one of the top converting sites out there because your type of site fits the NN mold perfectly

Opti
10-17-2004, 02:01 PM
Originally posted by SykkBoy@Oct 18 2004, 03:40 AM
CJ, your Celebrity site would be HUGE in the NN scene. I bet it would be one of the top converting sites out there because your type of site fits the NN mold perfectly
Sykk, thats exactly what the softcore traffic project I was talking about is for. If you would be willing to share some advice or ideas about this.. I'd mucho appreciate your knowledge! 2556404 or opti at celebritybling.com




And Alex... didn't you even look at the tours before you bought this up? I dunno if I missed a dodgy one or anything.. but none I looked at made me worry at all about the content... they are perfect for my softcore traffic. I only thought the non-nude naming was funny.

Mike AI
10-17-2004, 02:06 PM
Originally posted by Opti+Oct 17 2004, 01:02 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Opti @ Oct 17 2004, 01:02 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SykkBoy@Oct 18 2004, 03:40 AM
CJ, your Celebrity site would be HUGE in the NN scene. I bet it would be one of the top converting sites out there because your type of site fits the NN mold perfectly
Sykk, thats exactly what the softcore traffic project I was talking about is for. If you would be willing to share some advice or ideas about this.. I'd mucho appreciate your knowledge! 2556404 or opti at celebritybling.com




And Alex... didn't you even look at the tours before you bought this up? I dunno if I missed a dodgy one or anything.. but none I looked at made me worry at all about the content... they are perfect for my softcore traffic. I only thought the non-nude naming was funny. [/b][/quote]


Well lets come up with a new name to describe these tours accurately....

So far only CJ came up with a suggestion.

How about this.

We have hardcore, and softcore - how about nocore?

:lol:

Opti
10-17-2004, 02:38 PM
Mike,

the points Peaches and Sykk made made me think Alex and I may simply be out of touch... I'm not sure you do need to change it after the explanaion... unless you are concerned the perception is too wide spread and too negative maybe.

RawAlex
10-17-2004, 07:33 PM
Opti, I didn't look at the tours, because I don't have a purecash account and the links were not posted here to see. That is why I asked Mike to do so. The tours he posted are a mixed bag. Some of them clearly state the model is over 18 in the promo stream of the site (not in a disclaimer or 2257 notice, but actually in the text the end user might read), but the Sweet Little Blonde one certainly didn't seem to want to mention her age. It's all marketing, I know, but I could mistake her for being under 18.

#2 on google for non nude: http://www.nonudegirls.net/

Links to 17 year old models, models with no age, Jenny Teen model, etc.

#1 on google for nonnude: http://www.nonnude.com

Best link? Models 16 The most beautiful 16-year-old models on the web.

Sorry, NonNude is a KP indicator keyword, and marketing non nude with teen models is playing very close to the out of bounds line in my mind.

Mike, would you really want to buy traffic from people like that?

Alex

Vick
10-17-2004, 10:20 PM
Teasercore

Mike AI
10-17-2004, 10:46 PM
Alex for every site you post, I can post 10 more that are clean.

I am sure I could find a lot of teen, and similiar words that has illegal things on it.

RawAlex
10-17-2004, 10:50 PM
Mike, I wish you luck with it. Your making a marketing decision, some are not as easy as others. I am sure that Ron Cadwell will have a wry smile on his face when he reads this thread. :huh:

Alex

Mike AI
10-17-2004, 11:01 PM
Originally posted by RawAlex@Oct 17 2004, 09:51 PM
Mike, I wish you luck with it. Your making a marketing decision, some are not as easy as others. I am sure that Ron Cadwell will have a wry smile on his face when he reads this thread. :huh:

Alex


Alex, this will not be the last time we don't agree.

cj
10-18-2004, 05:07 AM
firstly, let me say DUH - of course we all know mike & the purecash crew are not involved in KP in any way .... I don't recall anyone saying they did, or accusing them of that. The thought never even crossed my mind ...

the points that are being made by Alex and myself are that the term NON NUDE belongs to KP .... period. you can't take a term back, reclaim it, change its meaning ... i'm not going to go through search engines and sites and point out the borderline nature of the niche - when I raised the point about evil chris's site, Little April, being borderline I was told to get over it ... and yet I had a site with a pic of Lindsay Lohan's panties on it and was jumped on from all sides.

When you pick up a copy of FHM, does it say 'non nude'?
What about Maxim or any of the other 'skin' mags that specialize in tease? If they did it they would be jumped on, imagine what would happen if the media got ahold of the porn industry doing it? Don't we have enough to fight against?

Sykk, yes celebrity does do well in this niche - its called mainstream ... you know, the business that adult is a niche of!? :biglaugh: It always makes me laugh how pornographers think they've found gold when they finally get something that mainstream has always done ... 'non nude' as you call it, summarizes the entire world outside of porn, so why does it have to just have 1 term or be considered a niche when it is a bigger market than porn is?

I'm building some tgp galleries currently that fit into this 'niche', but they are sorted & named as follows:

big screen babes
best big screen bikinis
topless
models
tease
etc

I just finished this one, which is a combination tgp gallery/tour featuring movies of fall/autumn ... its aimed at adult surfers, but has nothing to do with porn ...
http://www.privatecelebrity.com/in_cinemas/fall04/

as far as the adult 'niche' goes, I can't think of anything better than 'semi clothed' ... but Mike, just to stress this point again, even using a KP term, I never thought for a minute you were crossing any lines - just that it was the wrong choice of term. Leave the borderlines to the followers - you are a leader & we rely on you to make the right judgement calls ... if *you* of all people start to cross those lines, we are all doomed.

RawAlex
10-18-2004, 10:29 AM
cj, well said! :-)

Alex