BAN THE PEDOPHILE

[Carrie]

SERGE - GONZO - MIKE...
LadyM can give you the Wayback URLs that show where SE had images of children performing sexual acts on his site. You can easily look through GFY and see admission after admission of this PEDOPHILE regarding the content he had on his site.

You can easily look at his domain names and identify quickly the ones that should raise loud sirens in your head... ie k12sexeducation.com...

We are adult webmasters who are consistently threatened by the specter of child pornography. Many high-level enforcement agencies read this board.
By allowing SE to continue to be a member of Oprano, you are putting ALL of us at risk by allowing a known and admitted PEDOPHILE to be here.

There *are* more important things than pageviews.

BAN THE PEDOPHILE.

[sarettah]

Damn, I love when you get all hot under the collar :inlove:

[Cassie]

sex ed and acacia are 2 reasons i refrain from posting on gfy as much as i was when i first joined. both of these bring unwanted eyes from the government.

carrie is right, the government is not something to play with. there are other ways to bring page views.

[gonzo]

Ladies I can understand and agree that I find what this idiot is doing on his domains disgusting,illegal and the bane of the industry...however...

Unlike Bubba Luke Ford my degree in Journalism doesnt come from Columbia U. but this freedom of speech thing that I truely believe in keeps me from hitting the ban button.

I hate to ban anyone. This fucknut is the embodiment of things that wrong with the adult industry as a whole. However -- hes not done anything on here that I would begin to consider a banable offense.

Yes hes a pure idiot and doesnt realize it. Nonetheless that doesnt give me the right to ban him off of the resource. Until he does something like post some kiddie porn or make personal threats to folks...as much as I would like to I can see my way to ban him.

Of course Serge and Mike may disagree and you know what happens then.

BTW....J's is over here from another resource that banned him for pissing or at least thats he conclusion Ive came to. Some of yall including Serge find him to be an idiot as well. I did invite him to check out the community over and see what happened. Things arent always as they might seem at first glance. Yes in his case it is about pageviews and again...hes not done anything to be banned either.

Consider this...in trolling thru the banned list I only saw 2 names on there...
Confucy and Dravyk. Both are back on Oprano. For better or worse.

Your welcome to make your case with Mike and Serge though.

[Nickatilynx]

gonzo,

You know me , I believe that most undesirables can be "pissed" away.

but..... ;-)))

Until he does something like post some kiddie porn or make personal threats to folks...as much as I would like to I can see my way to ban him.


He has a known history of doing it.

J'Springer I would agree has done nothing to be banned.

But sexed is a known sicko.

[Carrie]

Gonzo, being an annoying egomaniac is no reason to ban someone from an adult webmaster board. Being someone who admits to putting pictures of children in sexual acts on his site *is*.

The more he is allowed to speak, the more he feels that he is validated, or that his pedophilic activity has been forgotten or "looked over".
And the longer he is allowed to stay, the more you're telling other pedophiles that there's a safe place for them on the Net - Oprano.

If Charles Manson walked into your house, would you kick his ass to the curb or would you say "well, I've really got no reason to make him leave, he hasn't done anything yet. If he should jump up and start killing my family, *then* I'll throw him out!" ?
By then it's too late.

Kwim?

[gonzo]

Originally posted by Nickatilynx@Nov 10 2003, 11:59 PM
gonzo,

You know me , I believe that most undesirables can be "pissed" away.

but..... ;-)))

Until he does something like post some kiddie porn or make personal threats to folks...as much as I would like to I can see my way to ban him.


He has a known history of doing it.

J'Springer I would agree has done nothing to be banned.

But sexed is a known sicko.
You realize things are all out of whack when I have to stand up for whats right even if it means [maybe temporarily] defending a sicko. I agree with everything thats been said. But the fact remains that he hasnt done anything on Oprano to be banned.

Its a call that would have to be made from higher in the family than me.
So get him to post a sicko pic or even a link to one and Id be more than happy to have him "sleeping with the fishes."

[Winetalk.com]

Gonzo, I am with you. Mike is even MORE with you than me, because he beleives I use ban button way to often
;-)))

Oprano is NOT the judge, the jury and the executionair.

Oprano beleives in the right to have an attorney....even mass murderers have defenders. And as our preambule of Constitution goes-
Give us your meak, give us your tired...unless you are brand0n, grogan, etc
;-))

[Winetalk.com]

and I swear,
I haven't read
"You realize things are all out of whack when I have to stand up for whats right even if it means [maybe temporarily] defending a sicko. I agree with everything thats been said. But the fact remains that he hasnt done anything on Oprano to be banned.
"
before I posted the similar notion....

Gonzo, we DO think alike....

[Trev]

I'm with Carrie on this one!

Drop this shit the way he deserves!

:steemed:

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by Trev@Nov 11 2003, 05:45 AM
I'm with Carrie on this one!

Drop this shit the way he deserves!

:steemed:
on what charges?

[Trev]

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 11 2003, 12:47 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 11 2003, 12:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Trev@Nov 11 2003, 05:45 AM
I'm with Carrie on this one!

Drop this shit the way he deserves!

:steemed:
on what charges?[/b][/quote]
3000 Volts DC would be nice

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by Trev+Nov 11 2003, 05:49 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Trev @ Nov 11 2003, 05:49 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by -Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 12:47 PM
<!--QuoteBegin--Trev@Nov 11 2003, 05:45 AM
I'm with Carrie on this one!

Drop this shit the way he deserves!

:steemed:
on what charges?
3000 Volts DC would be nice[/b][/quote]
he doesn't produce that much
;-))

[Trev]

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano+Nov 11 2003, 12:51 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Serge_Oprano @ Nov 11 2003, 12:51 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by -Trev@Nov 11 2003, 05:49 AM
Originally posted by -Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 12:47 PM
<!--QuoteBegin--Trev@Nov 11 2003, 05:45 AM
I'm with Carrie on this one!

Drop this shit the way he deserves!

:steemed:
on what charges?
3000 Volts DC would be nice
he doesn't produce that much
;-))[/b][/quote]
Then thats where we should help him :D

[TeenGodFather]

I thought I'd input my worthless 2 cents.
I don't know about his pedo-behaviour, never been to his sites. What I do know however is that he's a fucking retard and makes me want to hit him in the face with a blunt object, multiple times. He *MUST* be just fucking around, since nobody's really that fucking stupid.

"master blogger" and his fucking paranoia about the adult industry wanting trying to keep him quiet. He's just plain fucking stupid. :headwall:

[spazlabz]

2cd poll, the majority of which desire him to be banned. Ignoring him is almost impossible. what to do, what to do.............
spaz

[Frank]

I think he's a total idiot and an asshole but I believe in free speech. Is there an IGNORE feature on Oprano? That way people who dislike the claptrap he talks will never see it - and anyone who wants to read it can - I think self selection of censorship would be better.

- Frank.

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by Frank@Nov 11 2003, 07:52 AM
I think he's a total idiot and an asshole but I believe in free speech. Is there an IGNORE feature on Oprano? That way people who dislike the claptrap he talks will never see it - and anyone who wants to read it can - I think self selection of censorship would be better.

- Frank.
bingo!

NOBODY spends more time than me on the board and if I can avoid 90% of his posts,
ANYBODY can do it
;-)))

[sarettah]

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 03:09 AM
Oprano beleives in the right to have an attorney....even mass murderers have defenders. And as our preambule of Constitution goes-
Give us your meak, give us your tired...unless you are brand0n, grogan, etc

Ok...

Well, then let's have us a fair trial for the guy......















and then hang his ass !!

[Winetalk.com]

for what????
what have he done?????

[Winetalk.com]

I mean no disrespect to Sabby, but...are we are a bunch of women who bans people for saying HI?????

[sarettah]

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 08:08 AM
for what????
what have he done?????
He's oogly and his mama dresses him funny......




:yowsa:

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by sarettah+Nov 11 2003, 08:34 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sarettah @ Nov 11 2003, 08:34 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 08:08 AM
for what????
what have he done?????
He's oogly and his mama dresses him funny......




:yowsa:[/b][/quote]
so? my asshole is a size of a dollar coin..should I ban myself too?
;-))))

[LadyMischief]

Personally I find toying with him quite amusing. If he got banned I wouldn't cry either, but it's refreshing to watch him bury himself in his own stupidity. GFY is much more dangerous territory because there are people there who don't realize who or what he is, and he could catch their ear before they know he's leading them down a bad path. But I think here we're all intelligent enough and knowledgable enough that he's not fooling anyone. He's simply showing his true insanity (as he did last night), and if you play him right, he will simply self-destruct. Unfortunately if he is banned here, he's going to use it as yet another ploy for attention. I say we pound the shit out of him (verbally) and eventually he will go away on his own (if the police don't get there first, and I can assure you they ARE involved despite what the idiot thinks).

Karma is a bitch, I TRULY believe that, and this guy has woven such a web of lies and destruction around himself, there's absolutely no way he will not have that come back to bite him in the ass.. Myself, I can't wait to be there to see it when it does.

[FATPad]

The only problem is, he doesn't care if he gets caught in his own lies or stupidity. He's insane. All he wants is people to pay attention to him. It validates his own view of himself when people respond.

The more people respond to him, the more he will post. No amount of belittling, capturing in lies, or outright hatred even will make him go away. Making fun of him will just prove to him that people are scared of him and want to silence him, which will make him post more and more and more.

He's not like Grogan who was looking for acceptance and admiration.

[LadyMischief]

Originally posted by FATPad@Nov 11 2003, 06:03 AM
The only problem is, he doesn't care if he gets caught in his own lies or stupidity. He's insane. All he wants is people to pay attention to him. It validates his own view of himself when people respond.

The more people respond to him, the more he will post. No amount of belittling, capturing in lies, or outright hatred even will make him go away. Making fun of him will just prove to him that people are scared of him and want to silence him, which will make him post more and more and more.

He's not like Grogan who was looking for acceptance and admiration.
I think we figured out a good way to handle him though :)

[sarettah]

Originally posted by Serge_Oprano@Nov 11 2003, 08:41 AM
so? my asshole is a size of a dollar coin..should I ban myself too?
;-))))
Difference between having a big asshole and being a big asshole.......



:yowsa:

[Cassie]

in all fairness, gonzo is right. this is going to suck for me to admit but sex ed does have a right to speak (oh my god shoot me now) and if everyone, who we didnt like what they had to say, was banned, then freedom of speech as we know it would begin to dissolve.

we may not like what this creep stands for (i dont think he even knows what he stands for) and we may certainly may not like what he has to say, but by all accounts he has the right (it may be questionable though cause he is in canada and i know nothing about the laws there.....i can only apply the us first amendment to this).

it sickens me that he has to prey and troll around this community but until he goes the deep end legally (or if someone can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is in fact hurting kids), then there is nothing that can be done about him.

sabby had the right idea and nipped the problem before it started; i agree with her decision but i can also put the shoe on the other foot and see where the mods are coming from.

with that being said, i am going to get sick now....... :barfon:



Last edited by Cassie at Nov 11 2003, 10:35 AM

[Carrie]

Originally posted by Frank@Nov 11 2003, 07:52 AM
I think he's a total idiot and an asshole but I believe in free speech. Is there an IGNORE feature on Oprano? That way people who dislike the claptrap he talks will never see it - and anyone who wants to read it can - I think self selection of censorship would be better.

- Frank.
But we don't have an ignore capability, so our only recourse is to ask for him to be removed.
Every thread is a conversation, so if he posts in a thread that you've posted in, you are then engaged in a conversation with him even if you don't respond to him specifically.

[Sharpie]

WE DO HAVE 'THE IGNORE CAPABILITY.

Don't we have any control over our own post button.... or we like Springer and just have to reply?

For god's sake - WE CAN IGNORE. Most of what he posts is nonsense anyway. All we have to do is have a little restraint & his 0 reply posts will go straight to the bottom.

Can we handle that?

[Sharpie]

As for him posting in other threads..... again ignore him. His whole goal is to get attention. We don't give him any - he will maybe - just go away.

[cherrylula]

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 10 2003, 09:05 PM
If Charles Manson walked into your house, would you kick his ass to the curb or would you say "well, I've really got no reason to make him leave, he hasn't done anything yet. If he should jump up and start killing my family, *then* I'll throw him out!" ?
By then it's too late.

Kwim?
I would kill to have a beer with Charles Manson! He's ten times more interesting than sexed.

hehe ;)

and hey, nothing personal to those who want him banned, but I've witnessed what seems to be lots of attention to the guy and the same ones who want him banned seem to be the ones giving it to him...

I think he's the biggest retard to ever surface and the master blogger thing is just over the top. Give him a chance to do himself in, it will be more interesting to watch than if he was just banned.



Last edited by cherrylula at Nov 11 2003, 06:54 AM

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by cherrylula+Nov 11 2003, 09:51 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (cherrylula @ Nov 11 2003, 09:51 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Carrie@Nov 10 2003, 09:05 PM
If Charles Manson walked into your house, would you kick his ass to the curb or would you say "well, I've really got no reason to make him leave, he hasn't done anything yet. If he should jump up and start killing my family, *then* I'll throw him out!" ?
By then it's too late.

Kwim?
I would kill to have a beer with Charles Manson! He's ten times more interesting than sexed.

hehe ;)

and hey, nothing personal to those who want him banned, but I've witnessed what seems to be lots of attention to the guy and the same ones who want him banned seem to be the ones giving it to him...

I think he's the biggest retard to ever surface and the master blogger thing is just over the top. Give him a chance to do himself in, it will be more interesting to watch than if he was just banned.[/b][/quote]
:okthumb:

[cherrylula]

And think about it.... you can ban him from every possible board on the internet. What will this do?

It will give the master blogger much more time to spend on the bad shit he is supposedly doing. So by allowing him to run loose on the boards he is actually being distracted from the cp crap he supposedly does (I don't look at his site).

If he's that involved in the underage kid thing, then eventually the higher forces should get his ass, right?

I'm still waiting for his opinions on gay sex myself.



Last edited by cherrylula at Nov 11 2003, 07:18 AM

[Julene]

I just ignore sex ed's posts :)

[Gemini]

:o

Just had to see it for myself. He *is* here eh? :grrr:

Oh well... something to take in to consideration is what state Serge dear lives in since he is the 'base' of operations. What does your state law specify when dealing with a suspected criminal? It might fall under the Good Samaritan laws or could be something else. Most states have something along those lines.

[Winetalk.com]

Originally posted by Gemini@Nov 11 2003, 10:48 PM
:o

Just had to see it for myself. He *is* here eh? :grrr:

Oh well... something to take in to consideration is what state Serge dear lives in since he is the 'base' of operations. What does your state law specify when dealing with a suspected criminal? It might fall under the Good Samaritan laws or could be something else. Most states have something along those lines.
I'll ask the District Attorney in the morning...

[sexeducatoon.com]

I will never settle with the Circadia !!!!

BOW TO THE POWER OF THE MASTER BAITER :rokk:

Anal Orgasm is a Lie ! (http://www.awrats.com/sexeducatoon/index.htm)

[Gemini]

Just curious Serge. Our legal guy wasn't positive in our state so he's looking things up about that sort of thing. That clown isn't worth having any trouble over. :blink:

And I weren't pruned by George! ;-)

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 10 2003, 08:11 PM
SERGE - GONZO - MIKE...
LadyM can give you the Wayback URLs that show where SE had images of children performing sexual acts on his site. You can easily look through GFY and see admission after admission of this PEDOPHILE regarding the content he had on his site.

You can easily look at his domain names and identify quickly the ones that should raise loud sirens in your head... ie k12sexeducation.com...

We are adult webmasters who are consistently threatened by the specter of child pornography. Many high-level enforcement agencies read this board.
By allowing SE to continue to be a member of Oprano, you are putting ALL of us at risk by allowing a known and admitted PEDOPHILE to be here.

There *are* more important things than pageviews.

BAN THE PEDOPHILE.
Carrie you are a LIAR and you know it.
You've been pinned often and repeatedly by me.

YES - I have had pictures of children on my website and videos too.
The video of male infant circumcision when watched by prospective Mothers changes 80% of the minds who watch it (I've never watched the whole thing - it's disgusting) and they do not do it.

YES - I have had infants breast feeding.

YES - I had a Mother & Daughter article which promoted buying the back issue of a Canadian Version of time magazine, that had a Mother and Daughter dying of AIDS.

NO - none of that is illegal in Canada - but appears is now according to 2257 in the United States (new knowledge).

<H3>There has NEVER been an image - video or not - of minors (<18) enaged in sex on SexEducation.com.</H3>

Your continuous LIBELOUS slander will be dealt with one day!

Post this proof.
POST a heavily censored graphic.
Describe the graphic.

Otherwise - continue to make yourself look bad.

Do you not think that after being on this board and others FOR MANY MONTHS that someone might have done something?
Or are you saying that this board and the other board so well quoted here HAS NO-ONE WITH THE GUTS to call the police.

Do something or shut the fuck up you "board whore"
Dad@



Last edited by sexeducation at Nov 12 2003, 04:42 PM

[sexeducation]

bisexualsexeducation.com
catholicsexeducation.com
familysexeducation.com
gaysexeducation.com
globalsexeducation.com
hersexeducation.com
hissexeducation.com
lesbiansexeducation.com
sexeducationacademy.com
sexeducationbanners.com
sexeducationbooks.com
sexeducationcds.com
sexeducationchat.com
sexeducationcorp.com
sexeducationcorrespondence.com
sexeducationcourses.com
sexeducationdvds.com
sexeducationforums.com
sexeducationinc.com
sexeducationinternational.com
sexeducationlinks.com
sexeducationlivecam.com
sexeducationllc.com
sexeducationltd.com
sexeducationresearch.com
sexeducationstore.com
sexeducationstores.com
sexeducationuniversity.com
sexeducationwebring.com
universalsexeducation.com
worldwidesexeducation.com

All for sale with
SexEducation.COM, SexEducation.NET, SexEducation.ORG and SexEducation.TV

CAVEAT: FamilySexEducation.com is still available for free to an "applicant" before Jan 01, 2004

John Beacock
Webmaster@SexEducation.com
ICQ 32315652
1-403-619-2739

ps: and I think a handfull more too ...
list not complete or totally verified...


= = = = = = = = = = =

The above just posted on that other board.
I guess I should add K12SexEducation.com too ...
forgot about that one ...

[sexeducation]

"SERGE - GONZO - MIKE..."

Aaaah ... now I see the connection.
Learn something everyday.

Bow to the power of a Master Blogger.

This world is fucked up with sex. The adult industry is "partially" responsible.

You fuckers can help straighten it out.
Doing so - is good for your industry - and good for the world.

Have at it ...

[Carrie]

SexEducation, don't even toy with the idea of trying to piss me off. You can't do it.
Call me a liar - it means nothing. Being called a liar *by* a liar is actually quite humorous.

You've pinned me several times? Really? I barely speak to you. Please show me where you've pinned me several times.

Oh, and by the way, have you seen what a laughing stock you've become? You must be so proud.
http://www.sexeducatoon.com

Edited to make that a clickable link for the brain-impaired SE.



Last edited by Carrie at Nov 12 2003, 09:19 PM

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 12 2003, 06:17 PM
SexEducation, don't even toy with the idea of trying to piss me off. You can't do it.
Call me a liar - it means nothing. Being called a liar *by* a liar is actually quite humorous.

You've pinned me several times? Really? I barely speak to you. Please show me where you've pinned me several times.

Oh, and by the way, have you seen what a laughing stock you've become? You must be so proud.
http://www.sexeducation.com

Edited to make that a clickable link for the brain-impaired SE.
Yes - I will quote you.
Please follow the link quoted to view the global standard on what every person (male or female) should know before having partner sex.

Tks ...



Last edited by sexeducation at Nov 12 2003, 06:44 PM

[Carrie]

No proof to post?
Gee. So sad.

I guess the "education" in your name means that you NEED one. So here's a nugget for you.
There is no such thing as libelous slander.
There is libel, and there is slander.

Before you attempt to threaten or frighten me with big words, you might want to know what they mean.
Might I suggest http://www.dictionary.com to help you out?

[Carrie]

Hrmm.
I think our friend might have finally realized that the link I posted isn't his, and he's busy sputtering at his monitor threatening to sue his CPU for libelous slander.

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 12 2003, 06:57 PM
Hrmm.
I think our friend might have finally realized that the link I posted isn't his, and he's busy sputtering at his monitor threatening to sue his CPU for libelous slander.
You posted a link - "that was not mine" but you intended it to be so like so many other LIARS on this board - for what reason?

[Peaches]

Originally posted by sexeducation+Nov 12 2003, 11:47 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sexeducation @ Nov 12 2003, 11:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Carrie@Nov 12 2003, 06:57 PM
Hrmm.
I think our friend might have finally realized that the link I posted isn't his, and he's busy sputtering at his monitor threatening to sue his CPU for libelous slander.
You posted a link - "that was not mine" but you intended it to be so like so many other LIARS on this board - for what reason?[/b][/quote]
Huh? You're making even less sense than usual....and that's pretty bad. :(

[gonzo]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 12 2003, 07:57 PM
"SERGE - GONZO - MIKE..."

Aaaah ... now I see the connection.
Learn something everyday.

Bow to the power of a Master Blogger.

This world is fucked up with sex. The adult industry is "partially" responsible.

You fuckers can help straighten it out.
Doing so - is good for your industry - and good for the world.

Have at it ...
The connection is that any of the 3 of us would actually enjoy watching you in a prison video. Serge might even get out ze brromstick and massage that prostate for you.

Bow to the power of a Saucerhead.

[sarettah]

Originally posted by sexeducation+Nov 12 2003, 10:47 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sexeducation @ Nov 12 2003, 10:47 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--Carrie@Nov 12 2003, 06:57 PM
Hrmm.
I think our friend might have finally realized that the link I posted isn't his, and he's busy sputtering at his monitor threatening to sue his CPU for libelous slander.
You posted a link - "that was not mine" but you intended it to be so like so many other LIARS on this board - for what reason?[/b][/quote]
Did you click the link ?

It was

www.sexeducatoon.com (http://www.sexeducatoon.com)

and it was done especially for you ..... :inlove:

[sarettah]

Originally posted by gonzo@Nov 12 2003, 10:54 PM
The connection is that any of the 3 of us would actually enjoy watching you in a prison video. Serge might even get out ze brromstick and massage that prostate for you.

Bow to the power of a Saucerhead.
from page 5.........

HOW TO GET ASS FUCKED:
Prostrate Gland Stimulations
There are many types of action that produce prostrate gland stimulations.

Meeting a woman with a big strap on
Meeting a Russian with a broomstick
Screwing around on webmaster boards
Posting illegal content on websites
Participating in pedophile type activities
Promoting adult sites to minors
Mutual Fisting
Male Receiving Anal Sex ( Greek )
Female Receiving Anal Sex ( Backwards Greek )
Just acting like a total moron, and others.

If the penetration position or activity does not stimulate the prostrate gland - an ass fucking has not occurred regardless of gender.

Continue

************************************

Please note causative action number 2......

:yowsa:

[girlgeek]

Sarettah, don't do that!

That is some of the funniest shit I have ever seen! :wnw:

[Kevin2]

Originally posted by sarettah+Nov 12 2003, 08:11 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sarettah @ Nov 12 2003, 08:11 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--gonzo@Nov 12 2003, 10:54 PM
The connection is that any of the 3 of us would actually enjoy watching you in a prison video. Serge might even get out ze brromstick and massage that prostate for you.

Bow to the power of a Saucerhead.
from page 5.........

HOW TO GET ASS FUCKED:
Prostrate Gland Stimulations
There are many types of action that produce prostrate gland stimulations.

Meeting a woman with a big strap on
Meeting a Russian with a broomstick
Screwing around on webmaster boards
Posting illegal content on websites
Participating in pedophile type activities
Promoting adult sites to minors
Mutual Fisting
Male Receiving Anal Sex ( Greek )
Female Receiving Anal Sex ( Backwards Greek )
Just acting like a total moron, and others.

If the penetration position or activity does not stimulate the prostrate gland - an ass fucking has not occurred regardless of gender.

Continue

************************************

Please note causative action number 2......

:yowsa:[/b][/quote]
OMG this is sooo funny :biglaugh:

[Cassie]

after today, i needed to see that. that was just too funny for words. :biglaugh:

[sexeducation]

Cassie ...
lol ...
you really don't know how bad this looks upon yourself ...


; )

[sarettah]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 12:06 AM
Cassie ...
lol ...
you really don't know how bad this looks upon yourself ...


; )
huh !!

Cassie laughs at something and that makes her look bad ??

:unsure:

[Carrie]

John Beacock claims that his site is not a "porn site", but rather an educational site. Let's take a look.

Currently on his site there are many graphics that are showing up as red X's which have the text
Increase graphic sizes by turning on advertising banners. Get maximum size graphics with a FREE AVS Membership!
So his site is "educational", yet he is encouraging visitors to sign up for an Adult Verification Service where they will have access to thousands of porn sites.

He currently quotes many emails allegedly from children (and he states their ages). Here is one answer he gave to an alleged child of 11 years old:
Well, guess what ? Even infants masturbate. Huh ! Ya - that is right. Most boys and girls masturbate (play with themselves). They do not know the word masturbation but they know it feels good.

In fact us boys can get an erection pretty much the day we are born. So don't worry if you played with yourself before you say you started puberty. I am not encouraging this - just saying it will not harm you in anyway.

Girls do it too. Yes in the bath tub or have you ever seen a girl rocking on a rocking horse ? Is she going somewhere or rubbing herself on it ? You decide.

I don't know about you guys, but I do not plan to tell my sons when they are 11 that little girls on rocking horses are rubbing themselves for sexual stimulation. THIS is the type of responsible education that he is giving to children?

His site currently references background images and videos from unlicensed sources - ie: the "infamous Ally McBeal kiss" (video) and a fully scanned cover of Time magazine.

His site that is not "porn" did at one time feature videos from IDeepThroat.com. These videos were publically accessible and he claimed that he was using them for educational purposes.
This (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1997861) is a quote of him stating that his site is not porn:
Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"

I do not know how to link directly to a specific post, so I instead have hit the "Quote" button on those posts and will be linking to those 'quote' pages.

Here (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980418) he admits to having a picture of a nude minor on his site, and claims that he does not need 2257 info for the picture because since she is underage, her parents cannot sign for her photo to be released.

Here again (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980360) he admits to having a picture of a nude minor, and states that it was one of 16 that he downloaded "from several sources". He states that the child is "several years old".

In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980115), he reposts an article he had on his website entitled "Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay". At the time of publishing, this article was enhanced, as the title states, by images of child pornography. They have since been removed. In the article he says:
At what age does the female body become acceptable to display?
Well at any age - duh : )
The real legal question is - at what age can a person sell their likeness for profit?
He then goes on to question whether a child "selling" photographs of themselves for candy or toys should be considered "legal".
He finishes this "essay" off by stating:
The answer is - YES : ) There is a legal basis for minors to sue for compensation and punitive damages, if their identity is used for commercial profit.
Note that he only makes a caveat for commercial profit, but not for the perverted personal collection that was never intended to be distributed commercially.

In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1976195[/url) he is directly asked some very interesting questions, and gives his answers. He admits to NOT having the 2257 information for all models appearing in explicit images in his site, and then says that it is not illegal to post pictures of nude children in his home country of Canada.

In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1976110) he admits to having pictures of minors on his site that were nude, and that children and teens CAN access his member's section "with adult supervision".
1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?


#1: NO
#2: YES
#3: Still do.
#4: No

-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by SexKey - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.

-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by FreeNetPass - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.

-He has submitted his "non porn site" to ADULT PORN DIRECTORIES and had it listed, such as http://www.freesitexxx.com/other/ .

His claims that he is not interested in child pornography, in spite of his own quotes above.
The Wayback Machine at Archive.Org tells a different story.
You can access the full list of its snapshots of his website here (http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.sexeducation.com).

Just clicking on one at random (Oct. 18, 2000), here are the meta tags that I find:
META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="sex, oral sex, anal sex, safe sex, safer sex, teen sex, lolita sex, sex pictures,sex graphics, sex pix, sex videos, sex mpg, sex chat, sexual intercourse, yahoo, hotmail, icq, odigo, dick, porno, suck, fuck, penis, cock, vagina, tits, ass, cunt, pussy, cum"

Note the child pornography terms there.
On this same page, in the meta description, he states that his site is open to everyone - he even gives an age of 13, and goes on to describe the 'increasingly more sexually explicit material' that it has.
META NAME="description" content="FREE MEMBERSHIP - ALL AGES WELCOME (13+)
SexEducation.com is an E-Zine of sexual intercourse (discussion). There are three
viewing areas; VISITORS, TEENS & ADULTS. Each area presents increasingly more
sexually explicit material. Hundreds of pages, 5+ years in the making.
All areas are free to access. Sex Chat, full color graphics (pix/pics). COME VISIT OUR ONLINE STORE"

And as he's inviting in the 13yr olds, his site's title lets them know that they can find such things as teen sex, adult sex, and sex videos:
# SexEducation.com : ALL AGES (13+), E-Zine of Sexual Intercourse, Sexual Relationships, Sexual Techniques, Sex Chat, Sex Questions, Sex Answers, Sex Health, Oral Sex, Teen Sex, Adult Sex, Sex Techniques, Sex Pix, Sex Videos

Yet his site is not a porn site.
And his site does not cater to children - yet he gladly posts emails from children throughout his site.

Also, take a look at his email address. DAD @ sexeducation...

He is inviting 13yr olds to visit his site and view increasingly sexually explicit graphics and videos of teen sex. He posts video clips of a woman giving blowjobs from "IDeepThroat.com". He posts pictures of naked, underage children. He tries to encourage these 13yr old visitors to get even larger versions of the sexually explicit pictures on his site by signing up for an AVS service (where they'll also be exposed to thousands of adult porn sites).
And on top of that, when these children email him, he wants them to call him DAD.

Because of the fallout of his own admissions on GFY and other boards, he has removed most (if not all) of the images from his site. Using the WayBack machine, however, I was able to find an image of a man and a woman having sex, where the woman was rubbing her clitoris. There was no statement made about the couple's age, and yes, the picture was completely and freely accessible.

In spite of him removing these images, people do have screen captures of his site when he had them up. Lady Mischief is one of these people. She will not post the screen captures on any boards of course as they show child pornography. However if you contact her she has reams and reams of information on this man and would most likely send you the screen captures.

Now.
I have made no statements here which are not backed up immediately with posted proof from John Beacock himself, or with cached versions of his site from the completely objective site Archive.Org.

Make your own decisions.

SexEd, don't ever call me a fucking liar. I come with PROOF.

[Trev]

Carrie thats some excellent digging around you did there :okthumb:



Way to go :D

[spazlabz]

Originally posted by Carrie@Nov 12 2003, 09:54 PM
John Beacock claims that his site is not a "porn site", but rather an educational site. Let's take a look.

Currently on his site there are many graphics that are showing up as red X's which have the text
Increase graphic sizes by turning on advertising banners. Get maximum size graphics with a FREE AVS Membership!
So his site is "educational", yet he is encouraging visitors to sign up for an Adult Verification Service where they will have access to thousands of porn sites.

He currently quotes many emails allegedly from children (and he states their ages). Here is one answer he gave to an alleged child of 11 years old:
Well, guess what ? Even infants masturbate. Huh ! Ya - that is right. Most boys and girls masturbate (play with themselves). They do not know the word masturbation but they know it feels good.

In fact us boys can get an erection pretty much the day we are born. So don't worry if you played with yourself before you say you started puberty. I am not encouraging this - just saying it will not harm you in anyway.

Girls do it too. Yes in the bath tub or have you ever seen a girl rocking on a rocking horse ? Is she going somewhere or rubbing herself on it ? You decide.

I don't know about you guys, but I do not plan to tell my sons when they are 11 that little girls on rocking horses are rubbing themselves for sexual stimulation. THIS is the type of responsible education that he is giving to children?

His site currently references background images and videos from unlicensed sources - ie: the "infamous Ally McBeal kiss" (video) and a fully scanned cover of Time magazine.

His site that is not "porn" did at one time feature videos from IDeepThroat.com. These videos were publically accessible and he claimed that he was using them for educational purposes.
This (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1997861) is a quote of him stating that his site is not porn:
Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"

I do not know how to link directly to a specific post, so I instead have hit the "Quote" button on those posts and will be linking to those 'quote' pages.

Here (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980418) he admits to having a picture of a nude minor on his site, and claims that he does not need 2257 info for the picture because since she is underage, her parents cannot sign for her photo to be released.

Here again (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980360) he admits to having a picture of a nude minor, and states that it was one of 16 that he downloaded "from several sources". He states that the child is "several years old".

In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980115), he reposts an article he had on his website entitled "Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay". At the time of publishing, this article was enhanced, as the title states, by images of child pornography. They have since been removed. In the article he says:
At what age does the female body become acceptable to display?
Well at any age - duh : )
The real legal question is - at what age can a person sell their likeness for profit?
He then goes on to question whether a child "selling" photographs of themselves for candy or toys should be considered "legal".
He finishes this "essay" off by stating:
The answer is - YES : ) There is a legal basis for minors to sue for compensation and punitive damages, if their identity is used for commercial profit.
Note that he only makes a caveat for commercial profit, but not for the perverted personal collection that was never intended to be distributed commercially.

In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1976195[/url) he is directly asked some very interesting questions, and gives his answers. He admits to NOT having the 2257 information for all models appearing in explicit images in his site, and then says that it is not illegal to post pictures of nude children in his home country of Canada.

In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1976110) he admits to having pictures of minors on his site that were nude, and that children and teens CAN access his member's section "with adult supervision".
1. Did you have kiddie porn on your site?
2. Did you have any pictures of minors on your site that were nude?
3. Did you have something on your site saying that children or teens can access your members section with adult supervision?
4. Have you ever been in trouble with the law about sex with minors or anything of that nature?


#1: NO
#2: YES
#3: Still do.
#4: No

-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by SexKey - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.

-His "non porn site" has been banned for illegal content by FreeNetPass - a well known ADULT verification service that allows access to explicit pornographic websites.

-He has submitted his "non porn site" to ADULT PORN DIRECTORIES and had it listed, such as http://www.freesitexxx.com/other/ .

His claims that he is not interested in child pornography, in spite of his own quotes above.
The Wayback Machine at Archive.Org tells a different story.
You can access the full list of its snapshots of his website here (http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.sexeducation.com).

Just clicking on one at random (Oct. 18, 2000), here are the meta tags that I find:
META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="sex, oral sex, anal sex, safe sex, safer sex, teen sex, lolita sex, sex pictures,sex graphics, sex pix, sex videos, sex mpg, sex chat, sexual intercourse, yahoo, hotmail, icq, odigo, dick, porno, suck, fuck, penis, cock, vagina, tits, ass, cunt, pussy, cum"

Note the child pornography terms there.
On this same page, in the meta description, he states that his site is open to everyone - he even gives an age of 13, and goes on to describe the 'increasingly more sexually explicit material' that it has.
META NAME="description" content="FREE MEMBERSHIP - ALL AGES WELCOME (13+)
SexEducation.com is an E-Zine of sexual intercourse (discussion). There are three
viewing areas; VISITORS, TEENS & ADULTS. Each area presents increasingly more
sexually explicit material. Hundreds of pages, 5+ years in the making.
All areas are free to access. Sex Chat, full color graphics (pix/pics). COME VISIT OUR ONLINE STORE"

And as he's inviting in the 13yr olds, his site's title lets them know that they can find such things as teen sex, adult sex, and sex videos:
# SexEducation.com : ALL AGES (13+), E-Zine of Sexual Intercourse, Sexual Relationships, Sexual Techniques, Sex Chat, Sex Questions, Sex Answers, Sex Health, Oral Sex, Teen Sex, Adult Sex, Sex Techniques, Sex Pix, Sex Videos

Yet his site is not a porn site.
And his site does not cater to children - yet he gladly posts emails from children throughout his site.

Also, take a look at his email address. DAD @ sexeducation...

He is inviting 13yr olds to visit his site and view increasingly sexually explicit graphics and videos of teen sex. He posts video clips of a woman giving blowjobs from "IDeepThroat.com". He posts pictures of naked, underage children. He tries to encourage these 13yr old visitors to get even larger versions of the sexually explicit pictures on his site by signing up for an AVS service (where they'll also be exposed to thousands of adult porn sites).
And on top of that, when these children email him, he wants them to call him DAD.

Because of the fallout of his own admissions on GFY and other boards, he has removed most (if not all) of the images from his site. Using the WayBack machine, however, I was able to find an image of a man and a woman having sex, where the woman was rubbing her clitoris. There was no statement made about the couple's age, and yes, the picture was completely and freely accessible.

In spite of him removing these images, people do have screen captures of his site when he had them up. Lady Mischief is one of these people. She will not post the screen captures on any boards of course as they show child pornography. However if you contact her she has reams and reams of information on this man and would most likely send you the screen captures.

Now.
I have made no statements here which are not backed up immediately with posted proof from John Beacock himself, or with cached versions of his site from the completely objective site Archive.Org.

Make your own decisions.

SexEd, don't ever call me a fucking liar. I come with PROOF.
I am going to assume all this is true as I have no cause to question Carrie's credibility. So the only question that remains is why is this parasite still allowed to walk free? Why isn't he already being prosecuted or better yet, behind bars making a whole new batch of special friends who HE can call DAD?
To hell with banning him, someone needs to produce all that dirt for the Canadian officials who can do something real and meaningful with this info.
Buh-Bye SexEd

hey, maybe in prison you can explore the whole anal orgasm thing! Be sure to pen an article bout it k?

spaz

[sarettah]

:zoinks:

Good job Carrie !!!

and if that site took him 5 years to make ??? damn....you would think in that time he would have learned how to code at least.......




:yowsa:

[Peaches]

GREAT job, Carrie! Proof that SexEd is a sicko all in nice concise form. :rokk:

[Cassie]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 01:06 AM
Cassie ...
lol ...
you really don't know how bad this looks upon yourself ...


; )
i dont speak moron so i have no clue what you mean and i dont care for you to attempt to explain it.

que sara.

[sarettah]

Originally posted by Cassie@Nov 13 2003, 10:11 PM
que sara.
como ?

ooops...I've gotten so used to answering to sara around here... I just thought you was into S&M...yakno...Spaniards and Mexicans....


:yowsa:

[quiet]

i should ask Holly from GFY to start posting here. she's the resident sexed hater, and has lots of interesting information...

[sexeducation]

John Beacock claims that his site is not a "porn site", but rather an educational site. Let's take a look.

I don't claim my website is an educational site.
It is a magazine of global sexual intercourse.
More specifically a magazine which invokes discussion about controversial sexual topics. You claim it to be "educational" whereas my Access Policy clearly states it is for "entertainment".



Currently on his site there are many graphics that are showing up as red X's which have the text
Increase graphic sizes by turning on advertising banners. Get maximum size graphics with a FREE AVS Membership!
So his site is "educational", yet he is encouraging visitors to sign up for an Adult Verification Service where they will have access to thousands of porn sites.

SexEducation.com has been 100% anonymous since inception and will remain that way. In some countries of the world women are stoned to death just for showing their ankles.
Anonymity is a priority for SexEducation.com.
Hence, I will NEVER agree to 2% of gross sales with Acacia because it really means "we don't believe you show me your books."

He currently quotes many emails allegedly from children (and he states their ages). Here is one answer he gave to an alleged child of 11 years old:
Well, guess what ? Even infants masturbate. Huh ! Ya - that is right. Most boys and girls masturbate (play with themselves). They do not know the word masturbation but they know it feels good.

In fact us boys can get an erection pretty much the day we are born. So don't worry if you played with yourself before you say you started puberty. I am not encouraging this - just saying it will not harm you in anyway.

Girls do it too. Yes in the bath tub or have you ever seen a girl rocking on a rocking horse ? Is she going somewhere or rubbing herself on it ? You decide.

Yes - it is a scientific fact that infants have erections and play with themselves. They don't know what they are doing - but they do - do it.
I guess you have never changed a male infants diaper with an erection.
Grow up ... grow up... Every Parent has seen their infant child with an erection. Grow up ... like yawn ...
You disgust me ...


I don't know about you guys, but I do not plan to tell my sons when they are 11 that little girls on rocking horses are rubbing themselves for sexual stimulation. THIS is the type of responsible education that he is giving to children?

My website is not for children. It is a resource of material that Parents choose which article they wish to adapt to their own needs. But when you get a tough question - from your teen - I betcha you can find a "tough" type answer on SexEducation.com [Caveat - the site is broken right now.]

His site currently references background images and videos from unlicensed sources - ie: the "infamous Ally McBeal kiss" (video) and a fully scanned cover of Time magazine.

Many of those will be coming back under "fair use" of a magazine that performs sexual research. I am waiting for this Acacia thing to blow over.

His site that is not "porn" did at one time feature videos from IDeepThroat.com. These videos were publically accessible and he claimed that he was using them for educational purposes.

Heather at IDeepThroat.com ( A mother) gave me permission to use her content. She is still on my contact list. Yes - Adult women want to know how to do that. In fact, increasingly so as the adult industry continued to post that type of material on their directly accessed domain names ( which I am against). The adult industry helped to make many women feel inadequate because all they say was the extreme shit when the went looking for the physical knowledge of how to perform sex. In fact, on Xbiz I am engaged in a discussion about this right now.




This (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1997861) is a quote of him stating that his site is not porn:
Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"
The discussion of porn sites and the discussion of the graphics inherently means you have to post some of that.





I do not know how to link directly to a specific post, so I instead have hit the "Quote" button on those posts and will be linking to those 'quote' pages.

Here (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980418) he admits to having a picture of a nude minor on his site, and claims that he does not need 2257 info for the picture because since she is underage, her parents cannot sign for her photo to be released.

The article "Child Pornography - A Photo Essay by Dad@" discusses how minors can sue ANY WEBSITE which profited from the exposure of her likeness for profit. Then ended in a challenge to George W. Bush to do something about WhiteHouse.com. I won. That article is still talked about until this day and now that fucking porn site "WhiteHouse.com" is WHITEHOUSESEX.COM ...roflmao ... they got toasted by a Master Blogger.
Dad@




Here again (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980360) he admits to having a picture of a nude minor, and states that it was one of 16 that he downloaded "from several sources". He states that the child is "several years old".

I don't have any graphics now.
Posting a picture of a minor is not illegal in Canada.
If it was - then you could not post the diagrams of how to change a diaper, breast feeding, male infant circumcision etc ...
grow the fuck up ...
what hypocrisy you show ...
and you're a "playa" ...roflmao





In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1980115), he reposts an article he had on his website entitled "Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay". At the time of publishing, this article was enhanced, as the title states, by images of child pornography. They have since been removed. In the article he says:
[i]At what age does the female body become acceptable to display?
Well at any age - duh : )
The real legal question is - at what age can a person sell their likeness for profit?
He then goes on to question whether a child "selling" photographs of themselves for candy or toys should be considered "legal".
He finishes this "essay" off by stating:
The answer is - YES : ) There is a legal basis for minors to sue for compensation and punitive damages, if their identity is used for commercial profit.

EXPLAINED ABOVE ....


Note that he only makes a caveat for commercial profit, but not for the perverted personal collection that was never intended to be distributed commercially.

grow up ...
or go after all diaper commercials ...
and 11 year old models in the Sears Catelogue



In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1976195[/url) he is directly asked some very interesting questions, and gives his answers. He admits to NOT having the 2257 information for all models appearing in explicit images in his site, and then says that it is not illegal to post pictures of nude children in his home country of Canada.

YA ... When I bought the Corel Draw 100,000 clip art collection and used it's graphics - they did not have to be 2257 compliant ...


In this quote (http://www.gofuckyourself.com/newreply.php?s=&action=newreply&postid=1976110) he admits to having pictures of minors on his site that were nude, and that children and teens CAN access his member's section "with adult supervision".

The site is/was fully customizable to a Parent's wishes.
Graphics on or off.
Advertising on or off.
almost everything can be blocked or modified.
The site is for Parents not for children like yourself.


TEXT DELETED ...
BORING



SexEd, don't ever call me a fucking liar. I come with PROOF.


You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
Plain and simple ...

[gonzo]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 10:48 PM
[
Get a clue pedo d@d --
If we arent banning you we sure as hell arent banning Carrie.
Come one to Vegas and Ill show you some Southern hospitality from a Master Logger to the MasterBlogger.

[sexeducatoon.com]

Anal Orgasm is a LIE !!!!!! (http://www.sexeducatoon.com)

Bow to the Power of a Master Baiter !!!!!

And sexed.... From what I have read, you had absolutely nothing, nada, zilch to do with whithouse.com coming down and having to go back up as whitehousesex.com....

That fight was being fought from day one of the site opening...

and your "information" pages (sexeducation.org) where you preach the rhythm method as a viable form of birth control....

You should be shot for that alone......

Now BOW TO THE POWER !!!!! :rokk:



Last edited by sexeducatoon.com at Nov 13 2003, 07:57 PM

[Carrie]

I have posted enough proof - your OWN words are your judge and jury, my dear.
The arguments you gave above are laughable. Hell, half of them don't even deal with what you quoted but instead try to run off on a tangent to avoid the subject.

I have never tried to be a "playa" - yet evidently you think I am one since you keep referencing me as such, showing how little you truly know about this business.

If you want me banned, go for it dearheart, I'm standing right here.

Oh yeah - where is that nonexistent proof you were digging up of where you pinned me multiple times?

YOU think that little girls ride rocking horses for sexual gratification.
YOU force the children who write to you to call you "Dad".
YOU use terms like "lolita" and "teen sex" to attract visitors to your web site.
YOU post pictures of graphical sexual activities and videos on a site that you invite 13yr old children to.

IN MY OPINION, YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE. YOU ARE A DANGEROUS MAN THAT SHOULD BE RESTRICTED FROM COMING WITHIN 50 FEET OF ANY MINOR CHILD AND SHOULD HAVE ALL ABILITY TO ACCESS THE INTERNET REMOVED.

You want to sue me for my opinion? Go right ahead. I'm right here.

And the ONLY time I will EVER make a physical motion anywhere near "bowing" to you will be the day you come within 50 feet of my children and I'm bending over to check your pulse.

[sexeducatoon.com]

from :

http://www.sexeducation.org/sex/education/...set_frames.html (http://www.sexeducation.org/sex/education/apps/system/login/set_frames.html)

HOW TO SEX:
Combined Fertility Cycle
Sperm live for up to five days - male fertility cycle.
An egg lives for up to two days - female fertility cycle.
Through observations and the recording of female menstrual signs - an accurate diary can be used to predict the Combined Fertility Cycle.
The Combined Fertility Cycle is different for each partner sex couple.
During the Combined Fertility Cycle partner sex couples can choose or avoid pregnancy.
No person should be having partner sex - of any kind, unless they know how to calculate the Combined Fertility Cycle (CFC) as they are not intellectually ready.

************************************************** *******

My Reply:

from:
http://www.sexeducatoon.com/page8.htm

HOW TO GET ASS FUCKED:

Promoting the Idea of the "Combined Fertility Cycle" otherwise known as the Rhythm Method

This really has nothing to do with the topic at hand other than those that promote it deserve a good old fashioned ass fucking and those who practice it will probably feel like they have been ass fucked after they end up contributing to the uncontrolled population growth of our planet. Of all available birth control methods, this is probably the most fallible

Sperm live for up to five days except when they manage to survive longer than that- male fertility cycle.

An egg lives for up to two days except when they decide that life is good and go for five or six days- female fertility cycle.

Through observations and the recording of female menstrual signs - an accurate diary can be used to predict the Combined Fertility Cycle. It is important to note that this prediction is accurate to + or - 30 days in either direction.

The Combined Fertility Cycle is different for each partner sex couple with the only sure thing being is that it can change on a dime.

During the Combined Fertility Cycle partner sex couples can choose or avoid pregnancy by not fucking or using some other form of birth control.

No person should be having partner sex - of any kind, unless they realize that calculating the Combined Fertility Cycle (CFC) is a total waste of time and they are not intellectually ready. Any person that relies on this methodology to avoid a pregnancy deserves a good old fashioned ass fucking, and any person who promotes this methodology as a viable birth control methodology is probably receiving an ass fucking at this very moment.

[sexeducation]

You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...

POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...
about these two statements ...

[Carrie]

1. I have already posted proof - where your "essay" on child pornography INCLUDED pictures of children engaged in child pornography - as stated so yourself. I also said LadyM had screenshots - learn to read.

2. Yes, you have admitted you are a pedophile. You use pedophilic words such as "lolita" and "teen sex" on your site and invite 13yr olds to visit your site, I posted proof of you engaging in a conversation with an 11yr old boy trying to convince him of your sick thoughts that little girls ride rocking horses for sexual gratification. I posted proof of you showing graphic sex to children and explicit pictures to children in your replies to them. I posted proof of you admitting to having a nude photo (one of 16) of an underage girl on your site.
Do you not know what the definition of pedophile is?

3. If you want me banned, go for it.

I have posted proof, you have posted none. It is evident who the liar here is. I am finished speaking to you. And I repeat - do NOT come within 50 feet of my children. I will consider such an act a direct threat upon the lives of my children and I will take action accordingly. Is that clear enough for you?

Now if you have anything further to say to me, do it through your attorney. I'll be HAPPY to give him the address of MY attorney. Unlike you, I CAN afford one.

[Peaches]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 14 2003, 12:01 AM
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...

Carrie HAS posted proof.

You keep bringing Acacia up, yet you've never been contacted by them and you're in Canada. Of course you're going to remain anonymous to them - they don't care.

And what "financial health" can you POSSIBLY be talking about? Has your site turned a profit? Do you not realize that NO ONE HERE will EVER do any business with you and we felt that way LONG before Carrie posted her proof? In fact, all of us who read your crap on GFY realized we wouldn't do any business with you LONG before you ever became a "member" of this site! :P

If you weren't so dangerous to children, I'd consider you nothing but a joke. I'm just glad there are people in Canada who have given your information to the police there. :)

[sexeducation]

"1. I have already posted proof - where your "essay" on child pornography INCLUDED pictures of children engaged in child pornography - as stated so yourself. I also said LadyM had screenshots - learn to read."

Wrong ...
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN GRAPHICS OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY ON SEXEDUCATION.COM

In that essay though - there is a very controversial graphic ...
However, the graphic is 2257 compliant.
And with Serge's permission I would post it (non-nude).

I thoughT she was "Tawnee Stone" originally ...
but I have since learned different ...by posting the graphic on GFY ...

it is 2257 compliant though ...

Doesn't matter anyways ...
the article
"Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay by Dad@"
IS THREE FUCKING YEARS OLD ...UNALTERED !!!

The only one who complains is BE-A-TCHES like you.
grow the fuck up ...

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:01 PM

You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...

POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...
about these two statements ...

Answer these questions Carrie or be pinned by Dad@SexEducation.com

[girlgeek]

I have tried to avoid this one. Lord knows I already have my hands full with psychos, but....

Sexeducation,

One thing I have noticed about Carrie is that she researches her material well before posting it. If she has made a mistake, she seems to own up to it very quickly. I went and read some of your posts on GFY after reading her letter, and as a mother, I was left with a sick feeling in my stomach. I wouldn't want you anywhere near my kid, either.

If your site is for educating people about sex, including minors, then why are you hanging out on adult webmaster forums? Wouldn't any site dealing with sexual acts and catering to children, be tainted by the "stigma of pornography?" People tend to get in an uproar when you combine anything having to do with children, with pornography.

Just a thought from a curious bystander.

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by girlgeek@Nov 13 2003, 08:35 PM
I have tried to avoid this one. Lord knows I already have my hands full with psychos, but....

Sexeducation,

One thing I have noticed about Carrie is that she researches her material well before posting it. If she has made a mistake, she seems to own up to it very quickly. I went and read some of your posts on GFY after reading her letter, and as a mother, I was left with a sick feeling in my stomach. I wouldn't want you anywhere near my kid, either.

If your site is for educating people about sex, including minors, then why are you hanging out on adult webmaster forums? Wouldn't any site dealing with sexual acts and catering to children, be tainted by the "stigma of pornography?" People tend to get in an uproar when you combine anything having to do with children, with pornography.

Just a thought from a curious bystander.
The job of the Webmaster of SexEducation.com is to invoke intercourse(social discussion - look it up).

I do my job to the best of my ability.

I have made mistakes and crossed the line more then once.
We all have.

I DO NOT cater to children - but yet I address on the behalf of Parents questions that come from those less then the age of minority (no longer).

I hang out on adult forums because there are some perversions I wish to terminate.

75% percent of those searching for sex are in "your" industry the rest are in mine.

I want the adult industry to help terminate some of the sickest shit I have ever learned about.

[sexeducation]

I want the adult industry to terminate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

I am not going away until this happens.
Dad@

[Hell Puppy]

I'll wait for the power point version of this thread....

I like short sentences, bullet points and diagrams....

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by Hell Puppy@Nov 13 2003, 08:52 PM
I'll wait for the power point version of this thread....

I like short sentences, bullet points and diagrams....
np...

"Any cowardly Father that permits the circumcision of their daughter should be castrated." Dad@SexEducation.com

[Peaches]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 14 2003, 12:52 AM
I want the adult industry to terminate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

I am not going away until this happens.
Dad@
Please show us one, just ONE, example of a webmaster who posts on any of the adult webmaster boards you frequent who sells/gives away pictures of female genital mutilation or promotes it.

I have made mistakes and crossed the line more then once.
We all have.
We haven't all crossed the line as far as being a pedophile. In all my years on these boards and in the industry, you're the first I'm aware of. :zoinks:

[Hubby]

Originally posted by sexeducation+Nov 13 2003, 08:30 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sexeducation @ Nov 13 2003, 08:30 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:01 PM

You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...

POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...
about these two statements ...

Answer these questions Carrie or be pinned by Dad@SexEducation.com[/b][/quote]
Open your eyes ,read, and comprehend.
She has posted proof and you are ignoring it. You have never, nor will you ever come even close to "pinning" her.
You are the one that needs to grow up and get some help with your problems.

[sexeducation]

Originally posted by Hubby+Nov 13 2003, 08:58 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Hubby @ Nov 13 2003, 08:58 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Originally posted by -sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:30 PM
<!--QuoteBegin--sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:01 PM

You said I had graphics of children engaged in sexual acts ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

You said I admitted I was a pedophile ...
POST THE FUCKING PROOF YOU FUCKING LIAR ...

YOU SHOULD BE BANNED AS YOU HAVE BROKE SERGE'S NUMBER ONE RULE.
You attacked the financial health of a member of this board.
Plain and simple ...

POST YOUR FUCKING PROOF ...
about these two statements ...

Answer these questions Carrie or be pinned by Dad@SexEducation.com
Open your eyes ,read, and comprehend.
She has posted proof and you are ignoring it. You have never, nor will you ever come even close to "pinning" her.
You are the one that needs to grow up and get some help with your problems.[/b][/quote]
Hey - asshole ...
there are only two questions ...
post the fucking links to the proof ...

do you really think these diversions are cutting it with the average viewer ... of this board ???

She said, I admitted to being a pedophile - POST THE FUCKING PROOF.
She said, I had images of children engaged in sexual activity on SexEducation.com - POST THE FUCKING PROOF.

The opposite is already evident that neither of these statements is true.
Afterall, I'm still here ,,,
after a year of blogging on "adult" (roflmao) webmaster boards ...

Are you saying with all the PROOF that Lady, Peaches, sarettah, Cassie and others have ... THE PROOF ... THE PROOF ...
THE PROOF ... THAT THE ALL .. ALL.. CLAIM TO HAVE ???

You stupid Mother Fuckers ... the gawds of the Adult Industry have not been able to charge me ... think about that ...
YOU - fucking stupid mofo's have all THE PROOF, THE PROOF...
the "screen captures" etc etc etdc ...

I enjoy this thread when I think about how many "playa's" this Master Blogger is fucking in the ass simultaneously ...

You have nothing - because it is not true.

enjoy ...

I've done nothing wrong ...
except piss many off ...

like I really give a fuck ...
about your reputations ...

[girlgeek]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 08:47 PM
The job of the Webmaster of SexEducation.com is to invoke intercourse(social discussion - look it up).

I do my job to the best of my ability.

I have made mistakes and crossed the line more then once.
We all have.

I DO NOT cater to children - but yet I address on the behalf of Parents questions that come from those less then the age of minority (no longer).

I hang out on adult forums because there are some perversions I wish to terminate.

75% percent of those searching for sex are in "your" industry the rest are in mine.

I want the adult industry to help terminate some of the sickest shit I have ever learned about.
I am aware of what social discussion is, smartass. I was merely trying to participate in an intellectual conversation with you by asking questions to clarify some facts. This is what people of above average intelligence do, when they want to expand their knowledge.

In some of your posts, you said that you have made your site available to minors, therefore catering to children. Maybe you should look that up.

You seem to have a problem with assumptions, but then you assume I am in the adult industry. Hasn't anyone told you that I am one of the resident computer geeks? However, you're probably close on the fact that 75% of my industry is searching for sex on the internet. It's one of the pitfalls of having limited social skills.

A wise devil once told me this, and I think it might help you in your quest to terminate some perversions in the adult industry:

You'd be lucky to get 10 people to agree on anything in this industry, much less a level of acceptable behavior.

[sarettah]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 11:52 PM
I want the adult industry to terminate Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).

I am not going away until this happens.
Dad@
The adult industry on the net does not practice or condone Female Genital mutilation......

and it is well out of our range to do a damn thing about it....

Most FGM occurs through religous/tribal or governmental ritual and custom...

Go to those countries and try to do something about it... because around here dude, you are preaching to the choir and it is a choir that does not want to hear anymore from you.....

You want to make changes, go out in the world and make changes...

You want to make money, this is the place to be....

Now quit your whining and either turn your domains into a true educational environment and go preach about them on the mainstream boards or turn them into porn sites and then shut the fuck up and learn something about the fucking business !!!

[sarettah]

Originally posted by girlgeek@Nov 14 2003, 12:15 AM
You seem to have a problem with assumptions, but then you assume I am in the adult industry. Hasn't anyone told you that I am one of the resident computer geeks?
I hereby dub thee... Lady Darci..... Honorary Pornographer ........


:gbounce:

[sexeducation]

sarettah, and girlseek ...
I have to go to bed.
I have a long day tomorrow ...
not ignoring you ... cya ...
I think late Friday or very early Saturday ...
POOF ...

[sarettah]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 14 2003, 12:14 AM
Are you saying with all the PROOF that Lady, Peaches, sarettah, Cassie and others have ...
I have never claimed to have proof of anything about you...

<h1>YOU FUCKING LIAR</h1>

<h1>C'MON YOU FUCKING LIAR POST THE FUCKING PRROF THAT I EVER SAID I HAD PROOF ABOUT ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU</h1>


<h1>C'MON YOU FUCKING LIAR POST THE FUCKING PRROF THAT I EVER SAID I HAD PROOF ABOUT ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU</h1>


<h1>C'MON YOU FUCKING LIAR POST THE FUCKING PRROF THAT I EVER SAID I HAD PROOF ABOUT ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU</h1>


hows it feel to be pinned assfuck.........................

[girlgeek]

Originally posted by sarettah+Nov 13 2003, 09:19 PM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (sarettah @ Nov 13 2003, 09:19 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--girlgeek@Nov 14 2003, 12:15 AM
You seem to have a problem with assumptions, but then you assume I am in the adult industry. Hasn't anyone told you that I am one of the resident computer geeks?
I hereby dub thee... Lady Darci..... Honorary Pornographer ........


:gbounce:[/b][/quote]
Wow, I don't know what to say!!!

I want to thank...

:yowsa:

[gonzo]

Originally posted by sexeducation@Nov 13 2003, 11:28 PM
"1. I have already posted proof - where your "essay" on child pornography INCLUDED pictures of children engaged in child pornography - as stated so yourself. I also said LadyM had screenshots - learn to read."

Wrong ...
THERE HAS NEVER BEEN GRAPHICS OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY ON SEXEDUCATION.COM

In that essay though - there is a very controversial graphic ...
However, the graphic is 2257 compliant.
And with Serge's permission I would post it (non-nude).

I thoughT she was "Tawnee Stone" originally ...
but I have since learned different ...by posting the graphic on GFY ...

it is 2257 compliant though ...

Doesn't matter anyways ...
the article
"Child Pornography - A Pictoral Essay by Dad@"
IS THREE FUCKING YEARS OLD ...UNALTERED !!!

The only one who complains is BE-A-TCHES like you.
grow the fuck up ...
Post that pedo shit here and your gone.

[Sausage]

Can't someone just call the fbi and get this sicko put away.

Then we can get back to complaining about too much free porn, and how evil visa is.

[Trev]

Originally posted by Sausage@Nov 14 2003, 11:44 AM
Then we can get back to complaining about too much free porn, and how evil visa is.
Ahh to go back to 'normal' days :D

[spazlabz]

sexed. can you answer these simple questions
1) why are you here on Oprano?
2) what do you hope to achieve by posting on this board
3) do you realise that not one person here wishes to discuss anything with you at all
4) do you realize that this is a place where people have resources and are not pretenders?
5) what would it take for you to just leave the board?

answer those, I shoud very much like to learn your views on them

spaz

[Sausage]

Actually its kinda odd......

I have good mates who know exactly who is who, where, and for what company/sites for all online personalities, and they have never been wrong.

But Sexeducation ... I cant find out a damn thing. Noone knows him ... which makes me think that he has very little contact (if any) .... or importance in this industry.

However, I was talking to my lawyer and mentioned Sexed. I was advised to not talk to him directly or even exchange arguments on any public online forum .... because if he was suspected or convicted of CP (I forget which) ... it could become messy for me. Said it was very unlikely, but ....