View Full Version : Ladies, should we forgive Schwarzenegger?
confucy
10-02-2003, 04:21 PM
The Los Angeles Times has been talking to women who have had *encounters* with Arnold over the years. Let's face it...he is a hunk of a man and very rich. I know several women who wished he would grab their asses! I first ran into Arnold at Gold's Gym in Venice, California. At that time, he was pumped up. He had oil on his body, and he looked very strong...very muscular...very sexy! He didn't touch any of the females that day because he was posing for a magazine layout. He was strutting around, signing autographs.
However, I have heard stories about how he has pushed himself against women on his movie sets...how he has touched women under their clothes without their permission. He has been a Kobe Bryant type, thinking that he has the right to make unacceptable advances due to his celebrity status. It is known that Maria rules the roost at home. She is very conservative and probably has never been ON TOP in bed in her entire life!
The Los Angeles times came out with their article today and almost immediately Arnold apologized on camera. This was a cool move on his part, and he said he would do everything he could to make WOMEN a priority when he is elected.
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/recal...-home-headlines (http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/recall/la-me-women2oct02,1,2313555.story?coll=la-home-headlines)
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/recal...-home-headlines (http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/recall/la-100203recall_lat,1,2036431.story?coll=la-home-headlines)
Winetalk.com
10-02-2003, 04:28 PM
Gran Cosa!
since i am not running for Governor....
SHOW US YOUR TITS!!!!
Winetalk.com
10-02-2003, 05:39 PM
Originally posted by JR@Oct 2 2003, 04:25 PM
since i am not running for Governor....
SHOW US YOUR TITS!!!!
....and Mitnick's dick too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nickatilynx
10-02-2003, 05:49 PM
....and Mitnick's dick too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ahahahahahahaha that was wrong on so many levels.
confucy
10-02-2003, 08:05 PM
Mitnick is dickless and Arnold has bigger breasts than my girlfriends! :awinky:
Wouldn't you vote for him, Serge, if you lived in Calif? :rokk:
The news should be interesting tonight! Arnold is going to remove the auto license tax. He is for abortion. He wants to bring the movie industry back home. He will tax the Indian gambling. He will have after school programs for the kids. Who knows what he will do about the illegal drivers license, and who cares!
Carrie
10-02-2003, 11:08 PM
:bwave:
I just wandered in here.
sarettah
10-02-2003, 11:13 PM
Hi Carrie !!!!!!
:bwave: :bjump: :cdance: :bdance: :bjump: :gbounce: :redance: :cdance: :bjump: :bdance:
Peaches
10-02-2003, 11:17 PM
Originally posted by Carrie@Oct 2 2003, 11:16 PM
:bwave:
I just wandered in here.
Since you're here, let's call the thread "Carrie's Thread"! :)
sarettah
10-02-2003, 11:32 PM
Un Uh..... I posted here after Carrie so according to the rules... (chapter 7 subsection 11 paragraph a.34b....
I OWN THIS THREAD !!!!!
No tag backs.............................. :nyanya:
Carrie
10-03-2003, 05:03 AM
Peaches we should strike - there are waving bananas, dancing carrots, and no animated peaches?
Although just thinking of the possible interpretation of that and what would result is kinda scary.. :groucho:
Sarettah sneaks in with the rulebook ownership clause! Dammit! :ph34r:
Sharpie
10-03-2003, 10:16 AM
So who here is voting for Arnold?
He is surrounding himself with good people to help give him the right answers, which is the indication of a good leader, but...... they better be damn good - because I don't think he is qualified, nor do I think he understands 'the common man. He has been isolated as a 'star since coming to this country, and doesn't really have the background to understand the problems. The masses are just numbers. He certainly is NO Ronald Reagan! After a lifetime of spending all your energy on yourself and your body - hard to change I would think. I would wonder whose agenda he is really protraying, and who is the guiding light behind the man. Maria comes from a very political family.
confucy
10-03-2003, 01:01 PM
Sharpie, we don't have good options. The only good thing Bustamante has going for himself is that he is Hispanic. Big mouth Huffington pulled out of the race and is endorsing NO on the recall. Gray Davis has proven himself to be a failure, and he says one thing and does another. The other candidates don't have a chance in hell of winning so we can forget about them.
The candidates are all flawed. I don't like sexual harassment, but if Arnold dares to be dumb and arrogant enough to pull that shit AGAIN, he will be recalled and tarred and feathered. Today on the local Bill Handel talk radio show on KFI, not one female listener called the show to say they would not be voting for Arnold after hearing about his sexist acts and comments. Women like him. So do men!
The latimes is a liberal paper. They thought their article would hurt Arnold. However, the recent polls are showing Arnold is up another 2 points. We all knew that Schwarzenegger was a chauvinist. Aren't all men!! He has improved, and now that the press is all over him, he will do more for women than any of the other candidates. He has no choice but to be nice to us.
Would you mind having your ass grabbed by the terminator? He has the best body of any man I have ever seen, regardless of the size of his cock. Sharpie, he has been a leader in helping the youth. He has been a big supporter of bringing business back to California, because the movie industry is known for going outside the state to make films. He has been running multi-million dollars businesses. He does know what it is like to be down and out. Sure, that was a long time ago, but we never forget those early days when we were poor, do we?
Vote for Arnold! Right now, he is more of a Democrat than a Republican in his programs. :rokk:
sarah_webinc
10-03-2003, 10:29 PM
for being a republican? nawww :P
confucy
10-04-2003, 12:47 AM
The ladies were out in force today. While driving by Arnold's Santa Monica office, I ran into protestors blocking the street. They may be filing an action against him...a sexual battery charge! Oh boy! :redance:
another typical male, with typical behavior being typically sexist, with a typical sex drive.
fucking men!
kill them all!
Winetalk.com
10-04-2003, 04:14 AM
Originally posted by confucy@Oct 2 2003, 07:13 PM
Mitnick is dickless and Arnold has bigger breasts than my girlfriends! :awinky:
Wouldn't you vote for him, Serge, if you lived in Calif? :rokk:
The news should be interesting tonight! Arnold is going to remove the auto license tax. He is for abortion. He wants to bring the movie industry back home. He will tax the Indian gambling. He will have after school programs for the kids. Who knows what he will do about the illegal drivers license, and who cares!
I'd probably vote for him....just because I don't like Davis
;-)))
Winetalk.com
10-04-2003, 04:16 AM
Originally posted by confucy@Oct 3 2003, 12:09 PM
Would you mind having your ass grabbed by the terminator?
not at all, he can grab ALL my asses at any time
;_)))
confucy
10-04-2003, 02:25 PM
More problems for Arnold. Three more women have come forward to complain about Arnold's unwanted touching. Two Northern California papers have withdrawn their support of Arnold.
This should be *old hat* to the Kennedy family. When I watched Arnold and Maria on Oprah's show, I was waiting for Oprah to ask Arnold some REAL questions. Nothing! Nada! Oprah said they had been friends for a very long time. Oprah is beginning to piss me off. Do you really believe Arnold brings a tray to Maria in bed each day? He tells her he loves her every day? Maria's ex-housekeeper said Arnold never lifted a finger. Wonder if Arnold was pinching the maid's ass?
Why in the hell can't we find a politician who says what he means, and does what he says -- and at all times keeps his pants zipped and his off-color comments to himself. Is this asking too much? :cryin:
photogregg
10-04-2003, 09:18 PM
hahaha,
Porn pro's talking about sexual harrassment....My opinion is that he was a player...so what! The women complaining are trying to get publicity or $$$ based on his name. All politicians fuck around, vote for the one that gets the job done
PornoDoggy
10-04-2003, 09:23 PM
Originally posted by photogregg@Oct 4 2003, 08:26 PM
hahaha,
Porn pro's talking about sexual harrassment....My opinion is that he was a player...so what! The women complaining are trying to get publicity or $$$ based on his name. All politicians fuck around, vote for the one that gets the job done
I smell bacon ...
Carrie
10-05-2003, 01:27 AM
The women who are coming forward now - bah. This is just the "piling on" effect. You know, "hey, we can possibly get some publicity or some money by lying and saying it happened to us too, so let's do it" thing.
It's like when a bus gets hit by a car. The only real people that are going to be hurt are the folks who were directly around the area where the car impacted. But let the news say that the bus company is getting sued by someone, and suddenly everyone who was on that bus has whiplash, emotional duress and any other assorted maladies you can think of that will allow them to also get a piece of that monetary award.
Originally posted by confucy@Oct 4 2003, 10:33 AM
More problems for Arnold. Three more women have come forward to complain about Arnold's unwanted touching. Two Northern California papers have withdrawn their support of Arnold.
his ratings went up as a result.
Ironic that it was ok to defend Clinton for cheating on his wife with an intern and then lying about it in court and in congress as both the President of the United States and an attorney licensed to practice law... and somehow a horrible tragedy that the worlds most developed human being liked to grab chicks asses?
Is his best chance to get past the sexual harrassment stuff to become a Democrat?
PornoDoggy
10-05-2003, 03:02 AM
Oh, puuuuuuuuuuuu-leaze. This game offers no challenge at all.
It's ironic that inappopropriate sexual contact is such a horrible crime that we can devote tremendous resources of the United States Government to investigating allegations of it, not to mention considerable time of both houses of Congress - when it's done by a Democratic president of the United States, but the allegations of the same sort of conduct can be quicky dismissed when it's made against a Republican running for chief executive of a state with an economy larger than all but a few foreign countries.
Is the reason it was a problem for Clinton that he was a Democrat?
confucy
10-05-2003, 03:25 AM
The point is: men who can't keep their hands off women are sexual harassers. It doesn't matter whether they are Republicans or Democrats. The same applies to women.
I have joked about it, but it pisses me off. In fact, I may cast my vote for Larry Flynt. No, what I really want is to spread our illegal aliens around the country so California isn't getting all these people. It's a hell of a thing that countries have borders, but they do. Why should a beautiful state like California get every man, woman, and child who crosses the border?
The world is really screwed up. Young people are strapping bombs to their bodies and blowing up innocent people. They take a stupid survey and say that Nigerians are the happiest people in the world. No food! No Shelter! Rampant AIDS! Sure, they are as happy as they can be.
This subject is making me sick. :barfon:
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 4 2003, 11:10 PM
Oh, puuuuuuuuuuuu-leaze. This game offers no challenge at all.
It's ironic that inappopropriate sexual contact is such a horrible crime that we can devote tremendous resources of the United States Government to investigating allegations of it, not to mention considerable time of both houses of Congress - when it's done by a Democratic president of the United States, but the allegations of the same sort of conduct can be quicky dismissed when it's made against a Republican running for chief executive of a state with an economy larger than all but a few foreign countries.
Is the reason it was a problem for Clinton that he was a Democrat?
i would not defend either of them or their behavior in this respect. however, i would say there there is no parallel between the two since one of them was President of the US and went further to lie and court and to Congress and one is just being accused and not only that, he immediately admitted it and apologized.
anyhoo... i was just commenting on peoples political bias playing a large role in their priorities and sensitivities. i think we can both agree that happens.
now untwist your panties and go enjoy your Sunday!
:)
Peaches
10-05-2003, 10:03 AM
Originally posted by confucy@Oct 5 2003, 03:33 AM
The point is: men who can't keep their hands off women are sexual harassers.
I personally consider them "Good Dates". B) If a woman can't walk away from someone who is merely "touching" her (which is as far as I've seen the claims go), then she has more problems than Arnold has. :unsure:
confucy
10-05-2003, 11:25 AM
Peaches, I agree with you. The women I have seen around Arnold were touching him! No, I didn't see any groping, but who knows what happened when I turned my back.
Arnold is a hunk. The movie sets get wild at times. However, many of these women were not on movie sets, but in offices. They were afraid they would lose their jobs if they complained.
Now is there time for 15 minutes of fame. The women I know would slap his face or smile and grope back. Arnold was wrong, but if he becomes governor and acts like a fool, he will be in deep trouble. What I have never understood is why the wives of Clinton and Arnold would stay with the bastards when they have children? Who wants a daddy who is out there groping all the women?????
Sausage
10-06-2003, 01:19 AM
Originally posted by confucy@Oct 2 2003, 04:13 PM
The news should be interesting tonight! Arnold is going to remove the auto license tax. He is for abortion. He wants to bring the movie industry back home. He will tax the Indian gambling. He will have after school programs for the kids. Who knows what he will do about the illegal drivers license, and who cares!
You gotta be kidding. Now I hope he doesn't get in, because here in Australia we are really enjoying having a large slice of your movie industry :D
sarah_webinc
10-06-2003, 09:31 AM
am I the only one that gets excited before elections? I am such a politico
confucy
10-06-2003, 10:33 AM
Sarah, I'm excited about this election because it is the strangest big race I have ever experienced. I watched Tom Brokaw interview Arnold last night, and Arnold did a pretty good job answering the questions. Arnold said the women should have said something to him at the time he alledgedly groped, harassed or embarrassed them. He said he would have apologized, and the matter would have been over. Arnold is blaming Gray Davis' dirty campaign for the problems. When asked if he liked *power* he said that sometimes he is a leader, and sometimes he is a follower, and that both are important because you learn from each position.
The polls still show Arnold way ahead, and the yes on recall is a good 15 points in front. What can possibly stop Arnold? :rokk:
Julene
10-06-2003, 01:46 PM
I hope if Arnold wins that he straightens out the school fundings. :)
sarah_webinc
10-06-2003, 03:00 PM
well I guess there is a difference between being groped by a power ful guy who can get you fired but beyond that doesn't have an power and being groped by someone who may suddenly have real power.
I don't know if you have ever been sexually harrased but saying just to complain - especially to someone who is basiclly the boss - isn't always as easy as it appears.
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 5 2003, 01:10 AM
Oh, puuuuuuuuuuuu-leaze. This game offers no challenge at all.
It's ironic that inappopropriate sexual contact is such a horrible crime that we can devote tremendous resources of the United States Government to investigating allegations of it, not to mention considerable time of both houses of Congress - when it's done by a Democratic president of the United States, but the allegations of the same sort of conduct can be quicky dismissed when it's made against a Republican running for chief executive of a state with an economy larger than all but a few foreign countries.
Is the reason it was a problem for Clinton that he was a Democrat?
PD,
I know you know this and just intentionally continue to mischaracterize in order to influence the weaker minds reading your outputs, but I will correct you everytime you do it nonetheless:
Clinton was being sued in a court of law. When he perjured himself, that's when the impeachment stuff started. See, if people are allowed to perjure themselves when they get sued so that they can get out of paying any damages, then our legal system becomes inoperable.
But you know this.
PornoDoggy
10-06-2003, 03:25 PM
No, buffy, I'm not attempting to mischaracterize in any way, shape or form, and you know it - or you should.
Long before Clinton committed perjury - in fact, from before inauguaration - his relations with women was the subject of intense scrutiny, a great deal of it politically motivated.
If we're talking about mischaracterizations, you managed to leave out the fact that the lawsuit in question was funded in part by conservative groups.
So spare me the happy-crappy. The only point I was trying to make is that there are a lot of people who professed disgust at Clinton's conduct when it was only allegations, and some of those same people don't seem to have the same reaction when the same allegations are made against a Republican like Arnold.
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 6 2003, 01:33 PM
No, buffy, I'm not attempting to mischaracterize in any way, shape or form, and you know it - or you should.
Long before Clinton committed perjury - in fact, from before inauguaration - his relations with women was the subject of intense scrutiny, a great deal of it politically motivated.
If we're talking about mischaracterizations, you managed to leave out the fact that the lawsuit in question was funded in part by conservative groups.
So spare me the happy-crappy. The only point I was trying to make is that there are a lot of people who professed disgust at Clinton's conduct when it was only allegations, and some of those same people don't seem to have the same reaction when the same allegations are made against a Republican like Arnold.
If Arnold gets sued, then it rightfully becomes an issue -- but as it stands, all this amounts to is the LA Times trying to hurt his campaign. If the allegations are true, let the women sue.
Didn't Clinton settle and get disbarred?
confucy
10-06-2003, 04:30 PM
Sarah, I just saw the sexual harassment movie with Demi Moore and Michael Douglass again on cable. I know both men and women who have been sexually harassed and have lost their jobs. In one case, a female employee claimed that her boss was harassing her. She got another female to go along with her story. Her supervisor was called to the personnel dept and he was fired. I thought he was innocent...still do, but he was booted out. The second case involves a woman who worked in the school system. She got too personal with her HS male students, and she was fired.
Then we have Clinton and Schwarzenegger. Both were married. Both have children. What the hell were they thinking? I deeply resent the two of them for being so stupid. They are leaders. I like both of them. If they had played those games with me, I would have laughed it away. Those who are just now coming to the forefront to bitch are not credibile because they had an opportunity to do something about it years ago, and they didn't. Now, they are acting indignant and some are threatening lawsuits. Sour Milk! Or is it, Sour Grapes! It still doesn't excuse Arnold for being an aggressive asshole.
There will always be gropers in this world. Our young people should be taught to keep their off-color comments to themselves and keep their hands inside their pockets. Don't be like your daddys and your mommys who play hurtful games.
ulfie
10-06-2003, 04:33 PM
Originally posted by Peaches+Oct 5 2003, 09:11 AM--></span><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Peaches @ Oct 5 2003, 09:11 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteBegin--confucy@Oct 5 2003, 03:33 AM
The point is: men who can't keep their hands off women are sexual harassers.
I personally consider them "Good Dates". B)[/b][/quote]
Filing that quote away for future reference. :P
As far as Arnold goes I doubt he will be a effective governer but it isn't my problem since I live 3000 miles from California. He seems to have the attitude that since he "played" the Terminator he can do the same thing in real life. I think he's in for a rude awakening if he wins. Just my opinion.
Torone
10-06-2003, 07:37 PM
Something no one seems to have noticed...The claims all relate back to a time when
(1) Sexual harassment did not exist
and
(2) Arnold was NOT married.
There is another facet which has not been mentioned...This is a political race which the Dems are losing badly. You know that they can't give a reason NOT to recall Davis or to elect Bustamante; so they resort to their forte'...character assassination.
Last edited by Torone at Oct 6 2003, 05:46 PM
PornoDoggy
10-06-2003, 11:04 PM
Originally posted by Torone@Oct 6 2003, 06:45 PM
Something no one seems to have noticed...The claims all relate back to a time when
(1) Sexual harassment did not exist
and
(2) Arnold was NOT married.
There is another facet which has not been mentioned...This is a political race which the Dems are losing badly. You know that they can't give a reason NOT to recall Davis or to elect Bustamante; so they resort to their forte'...character assassination.
Where in the Sam Hell have you been? :D
Dude ... these allegations date from before Anita Hill talked about Clarence Thomas, and extend though the time Clinton was "aquitted" (?) by the Senate. It doesn't fucking matter if he was married or not.
And finally ... you really think the Republicans and the San Deigo Union would be behaving any differently? Methinks thou doth protest too much ...
confucy
10-06-2003, 11:45 PM
Tyrone, slow down! Let's go back to your sexual harassment statement. Sexual harassment has been on the books for a very long time. Arnold has been harassing women while single and married. He had the reputation as a party boy before he got married, and he continued to party and play after he was married. Some of the recent charges have occurred within the last two years.
I hate to be sexist, but look at his wife Maria's face. The lady has aged. Look at her mother. Maria is turning into her mother which is not a pretty sight. Arnold likes young cuties like the rest of you men. He likes to flirt. Fine! But groping and touching without consent is not flirting. The women should have decked him and grabbed and groped his tiny penis for all to see.
In 24 hours, we will have Arnold as our governor. I think his groping days are over if he wants to remain in office. I tell ya, guys.....you have to lower your testosterone levels and behave or you will all end up in court with women suing you for harassment.
SouthO
10-07-2003, 03:21 AM
GROPENATOR FOR GOVERNOR! :rokk:
Torone
10-07-2003, 05:46 AM
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 6 2003, 09:12 PM
Where in the Sam Hell have you been? :D
Dude ... these allegations date from before Anita Hill talked about Clarence Thomas, and extend though the time Clinton was "aquitted" (?) by the Senate. It doesn't fucking matter if he was married or not.
And finally ... you really think the Republicans and the San Deigo Union would be behaving any differently? Methinks thou doth protest too much ...
First, I've been very sick (Serge can probably guess the details); and haven't been able to do much.
Ok, now to your somewhat naive remarks...
First, you should remember that this is exactly what Ms. Huffington threatened on national TV.
Second, I am much older than you or 'sexual harassment'; and I can remember when some women actually liked being groped.
Third, I tend to automatically discount 'anonymous' statements as lies.
Fourth, the Republicans WOULD do differently. They haven't (for instance) made a big thing out of Bustamante's membership in an organisation which is dedicated to returning most of the Southern U.S. to Mexico. Nor have they mentioned the fact that Davis has set up a massive voter fraud machine by giving illegals driver's licenses. Bustamante's misappropration of the funds from the Indian tribes has been largely ignored, etc.
However, if it makes you feel good to believe the BS that the Democommies are spouting, go ahead. It is a right you and I served to protect.
Torone
10-07-2003, 05:51 AM
Originally posted by confucy@Oct 6 2003, 09:53 PM
Tyrone, slow down! Let's go back to your sexual harassment statement. Sexual harassment has been on the books for a very long time. Arnold has been harassing women while single and married. He had the reputation as a party boy before he got married, and he continued to party and play after he was married. Some of the recent charges have occurred within the last two years.
I hate to be sexist, but look at his wife Maria's face. The lady has aged. Look at her mother. Maria is turning into her mother which is not a pretty sight. Arnold likes young cuties like the rest of you men. He likes to flirt. Fine! But groping and touching without consent is not flirting. The women should have decked him and grabbed and groped his tiny penis for all to see.
In 24 hours, we will have Arnold as our governor. I think his groping days are over if he wants to remain in office. I tell ya, guys.....you have to lower your testosterone levels and behave or you will all end up in court with women suing you for harassment.
I can't respond to your remarks...I am not Tyrone.
If you are too ignorant to read and spell my name right, your remarks are meaningless.
If you did it on purpose to irritate me, same story.
Get it right, and perhaps we can have a discourse... :lol:
sarettah
10-07-2003, 08:22 AM
We are interrupting this thread for a very important announcement:
<font size="7">WELCOME HOME</font>
<font size="7">TORONE !!!!!</font>
:gbounce: :redance: :bdance: :bwave: :bjump: :cdance: :bjump: :bwave: :bdance: :redance: :gbounce:
we now return you to the thread in progress.....thank you
Last edited by sarettah at Oct 7 2003, 07:32 AM
confucy
10-07-2003, 11:58 AM
Torone, no disrespect intended, just tired fingers and a typo error.
The Gray Davis camp has been trying to smear their competition, and I think it has backfired because Arnold's figures are up.
Each and every one of us has to decide what we will tolerate when it comes to unwanted touching. Some women are the gropers, and they, too, get into trouble. To be on the safe side, I prefer acting in a business-like fashion when I am working. Many are lying and using sexual harassment as a way to get money or to get back at an innocent person. It gets very complicated.
I don't know you and didn't know you were having some health issues. Best of luck to you with your recovery. :okthumb:
PornoDoggy
10-07-2003, 12:08 PM
Really sorry to hear you've been sick, bro ... hope things are getting better.
Not going to bother with your rant about the mythical demacommies, nor am I going to belabor the point that the Democrats are doing EXACTLY what the Republicans would be doing were the situation reversed.
Somebody needs to start a pickem or pool on when the next recall campaign gets underway.
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 7 2003, 10:16 AM
Really sorry to hear you've been sick, bro ... hope things are getting better.
Not going to bother with your rant about the mythical demacommies, nor am I going to belabor the point that the Democrats are doing EXACTLY what the Republicans would be doing were the situation reversed.
Somebody needs to start a pickem or pool on when the next recall campaign gets underway.
I hope it starts the second Arnold is elected. I can think of nothing better for California or any other state for that matter than to have no governor and no passage of legislation.
confucy
10-07-2003, 08:55 PM
It still looks like Arnold is leading. In an hour when the polls close, we will know for sure!
confucy
10-07-2003, 11:28 PM
If Arnold gropes one female ass or one female breast, we will recall the bastard! :gbounce:
Until then, congratulations! Looks like our license fees will be reduced immediately. Arnold said so. Looks like we will be bringing back the movie making to California. Arnold said so. :rokk:
Torone
10-08-2003, 06:43 AM
Confucy,
"Torone, no disrespect intended, just tired fingers and a typo error."
Actually, no problem. I was just jerkin' your chain... :agrin:
Pd,
Thanks! It's good to be back (and able to sit up). :agrin:
Saretta,
THANKS! :agrin:
Torone
10-08-2003, 06:55 AM
Originally posted by PornoDoggy@Oct 7 2003, 10:16 AM
Not going to bother with your rant about the mythical demacommies, nor am I going to belabor the point that the Democrats are doing EXACTLY what the Republicans would be doing were the situation reversed.
Somebody needs to start a pickem or pool on when the next recall campaign gets underway.
Actually, the situation IS reversed...remember, you're not talking about the rest of the USA. You're talking about the People's Republic of California. There, it's ok for the governor to physically abuse his staff (i.e. shove, hit, etc) as long as he's part of the Liberal establishment.
As for the 'mythical' Democommies, you must read the Communist goals as published in 1963 and visit the CPUSA website... rather eye-opening.
Oh, and Davis has already promised to start another recall petition immediately if Arnold is elected.
confucy
10-08-2003, 10:38 AM
Yes, California is a bit weird. That's why some of us love it! We use to have the Republic of Santa Monica when Tom Hayden and Jane Fonda were here. Up around San Francisco we have Jerry Brown and his liberal group. Now we have Arnold. I must say, he is one sexy GOVERNOR. :wnw:
Let's see how he handles himself.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.