JR
02-28-2003, 10:27 AM
lets skip France and just boycott anyone with an opinion, position or stance on anything.
we can go further and boycott anyone who expresses their opinions and position better than George Bush does from a white Ford truck on his ranch, in Crawford Texas.
we should certainly boycott people who get together and agree on a course of action that the USA does not agree with.
then we should continue forward and boycott the UN because even though it was established as a democratic means of international conflict resolution involving the participation and voice of all its members... we dont need them anymore because their opinions, although a consensus, are more popular now than those of England, Spain and the USA... which as we all know are right, so that in itself negates the democratic process.
When everyone agrees with the US, we can then agree that the democratic process is working again as the US intended it to in the first place... and lift the boycott.
Last edited by JR at Feb 28 2003, 07:38 AM
we can go further and boycott anyone who expresses their opinions and position better than George Bush does from a white Ford truck on his ranch, in Crawford Texas.
we should certainly boycott people who get together and agree on a course of action that the USA does not agree with.
then we should continue forward and boycott the UN because even though it was established as a democratic means of international conflict resolution involving the participation and voice of all its members... we dont need them anymore because their opinions, although a consensus, are more popular now than those of England, Spain and the USA... which as we all know are right, so that in itself negates the democratic process.
When everyone agrees with the US, we can then agree that the democratic process is working again as the US intended it to in the first place... and lift the boycott.
Last edited by JR at Feb 28 2003, 07:38 AM